Hodgson....

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
Mar
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5344
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Hodgson....

Post by Mar » Wed May 02, 2012 9:24 am

Be interesting to see how this goes. In the past we've had managers that have been built up then chastised when getting stuck in.
Capello, McClaren, Sven all got praised when starting. Theres no real expectancy here. Hopefully the media will back him when the tournament gets going as opposed to finding out a way to tear him down off a lofty perch.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Hodgson....

Post by CrazyHorse » Wed May 02, 2012 9:34 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:Aye, cos we immediately identified with Capello didn't we? :?
I'm stating why Hodgson is not popular with the media.

Capello wasn't popular either, but they stuck with him early doors because of his record and the fact he was somewhat of an unknown quantity to our media....

Didn't take long for the knives to come out did it?
It's frightening, isn't it? He's not even properly in the job full time for another week or so and they've started. Wouldn't surprise me at all if this Sunday's Sun had a front page exclusive exposé on him.
Businesswoman of the year.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Hodgson....

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed May 02, 2012 9:38 am

Hoss - can we ban anyone that calls him 'Woy'? The bloke has a speech impediment - so what?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36135
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Hodgson....

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed May 02, 2012 9:39 am

CrazyHorse wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:Aye, cos we immediately identified with Capello didn't we? :?
I'm stating why Hodgson is not popular with the media.

Capello wasn't popular either, but they stuck with him early doors because of his record and the fact he was somewhat of an unknown quantity to our media....

Didn't take long for the knives to come out did it?
It's frightening, isn't it? He's not even properly in the job full time for another week or so and they've started. Wouldn't surprise me at all if this Sunday's Sun had a front page exclusive exposé on him.
Aye probably "Woy has wonce wead a book - we hate him cos he's clewerer than wus".

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Hodgson....

Post by thebish » Wed May 02, 2012 9:39 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:Hoss - can we ban anyone that calls him 'Woy'? The bloke has a speech impediment - so what?

I agwee Bwuce... :wink:

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Hodgson....

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed May 02, 2012 10:28 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:Hoss - can we ban anyone that calls him 'Woy'? The bloke has a speech impediment - so what?
Gets my vote. Unnecessary.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36135
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Hodgson....

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed May 02, 2012 10:35 am

Lord Kangana wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Hoss - can we ban anyone that calls him 'Woy'? The bloke has a speech impediment - so what?
Gets my vote. Unnecessary.
I think referring to him as Woy on a message board is fine. Its a term of endearment almost.

Like people calling Jonathon Ross "wossy". He doesn't seem to mind it.

I think that is quite different from the Suns front page today, IMHO at least.....

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Hodgson....

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Wed May 02, 2012 10:59 am

I think it's unnecessary in the sense that he's being primed as a figure of fun from day one, which is a shame.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Hodgson....

Post by thebish » Wed May 02, 2012 11:50 am

I suspect that Hodgson would not react favourably to his perfectly ordinary way of speaking being described as a "speech impediment"...

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Hodgson....

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed May 02, 2012 12:31 pm

Whereas I'm sure he's perfectly ecstatic about being called Woy.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Hodgson....

Post by thebish » Wed May 02, 2012 12:34 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Whereas I'm sure he's perfectly ecstatic about being called Woy.
I doubt he's happy about either... it's not a speech impediment, though... (is it?)

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Hodgson....

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed May 02, 2012 12:39 pm

I don't know, but whichever c*nt wrote the Sun headline wants some Hoboh-style justice meted out on him. Or her, obviously.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36135
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Hodgson....

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed May 02, 2012 1:00 pm

He's been referred to as Woy for years on this forum, other forums, the media, radio phone ins, etc and nobody has once raised an objection to it.

I don't agree with The Sun headline either.

But lets not get carried away. I'd be susprised if Roy was upset when he sees himself referred to as Woy. He's probably glad its not worse!

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14006
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Hodgson....

Post by officer_dibble » Wed May 02, 2012 1:01 pm

anyone but redknapp!!!

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Hodgson....

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Wed May 02, 2012 1:01 pm

He'll soon be called other names beginning with W im sure.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Hodgson....

Post by thebish » Wed May 02, 2012 1:29 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:He's been referred to as Woy for years on this forum, other forums, the media, radio phone ins, etc and nobody has once raised an objection to it.

and - on this Forum..

Harry Redknapp has been referred to as Arry - cos he can't say his H's

or as Droopy - cos of his facial impediment
or as Twitchy - cos of his facial impediment

and Alex Ferguson as Red Nose - cos of his nasal impediment
and David Moyes as Spazzy Eyes - cos of his eyeball impediment

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12942
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Hodgson....

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Wed May 02, 2012 3:48 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:He's been referred to as Woy for years on this forum, other forums, the media, radio phone ins, etc and nobody has once raised an objection to it.

and - on this Forum..

Harry Redknapp has been referred to as Arry - cos he can't say his H's

or as Droopy - cos of his facial impediment
or as Twitchy - cos of his facial impediment

and Alex Ferguson as Red Nose - cos of his nasal impediment
and David Moyes as Spazzy Eyes - cos of his eyeball impediment
Which doesn't make any of it right (though I consider 'Arry acceptable because it is dialect not impediment). I'm a bit surprised at BWFCI's insensitivity tbh.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36135
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Hodgson....

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed May 02, 2012 3:56 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:He's been referred to as Woy for years on this forum, other forums, the media, radio phone ins, etc and nobody has once raised an objection to it.

and - on this Forum..

Harry Redknapp has been referred to as Arry - cos he can't say his H's

or as Droopy - cos of his facial impediment
or as Twitchy - cos of his facial impediment

and Alex Ferguson as Red Nose - cos of his nasal impediment
and David Moyes as Spazzy Eyes - cos of his eyeball impediment
Which doesn't make any of it right (though I consider 'Arry acceptable because it is dialect not impediment). I'm a bit surprised at BWFCI's insensitivity tbh.
Because I think its a non issue.

The Sun Headline was taking it far too far.

But as I say its kind of an affectionate name for him that has been used by fans of the clubs he has managed. A bit like "big Sam". It could be seen as mocking a mans weight issues but I think anyone with any sense wouldn't object to it....

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Hodgson....

Post by thebish » Wed May 02, 2012 4:28 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:He's been referred to as Woy for years on this forum, other forums, the media, radio phone ins, etc and nobody has once raised an objection to it.

and - on this Forum..

Harry Redknapp has been referred to as Arry - cos he can't say his H's

or as Droopy - cos of his facial impediment
or as Twitchy - cos of his facial impediment

and Alex Ferguson as Red Nose - cos of his nasal impediment
and David Moyes as Spazzy Eyes - cos of his eyeball impediment
Which doesn't make any of it right (though I consider 'Arry acceptable because it is dialect not impediment). I'm a bit surprised at BWFCI's insensitivity tbh.
But neither has Roy Hodgson got a speech impediment!! he just says his R's in a particular way (and as has been pointed out through the day by speech therapists - he actually says his R's in 2 or 3 different ways - perhaps reflecting the fact that he speaks several languages and has travelled extensively across europe.)

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12942
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Hodgson....

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Wed May 02, 2012 4:57 pm

thebish wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:He's been referred to as Woy for years on this forum, other forums, the media, radio phone ins, etc and nobody has once raised an objection to it.

and - on this Forum..

Harry Redknapp has been referred to as Arry - cos he can't say his H's

or as Droopy - cos of his facial impediment
or as Twitchy - cos of his facial impediment

and Alex Ferguson as Red Nose - cos of his nasal impediment
and David Moyes as Spazzy Eyes - cos of his eyeball impediment
Which doesn't make any of it right (though I consider 'Arry acceptable because it is dialect not impediment). I'm a bit surprised at BWFCI's insensitivity tbh.
But neither has Roy Hodgson got a speech impediment!! he just says his R's in a particular way (and as has been pointed out through the day by speech therapists - he actually says his R's in 2 or 3 different ways - perhaps reflecting the fact that he speaks several languages and has travelled extensively across europe.)
I assumed he had a speech impediment because this all began with:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Hoss - can we ban anyone that calls him 'Woy'? The bloke has a speech impediment - so what?
Bruce is generally a trustworthy source.
Yet you could be right. Personally I was under the impression that Owen Coyle has a speech impediment because I can only understand one word in three when he is interviewed. However, I accept the fact that I have a tin ear. I still don't generally think it is good to mock a speech 'peculiarity' and then assume that it is all taken in good humour.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests