Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Yep. So in that situation, I think all we can do is keep games as tight as possible and hope we score off a set piece. Like we did against Southend, Scunny and Oldham. We just have to hope we come out the right side of the scrambles and set pieces.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:53 amYes, but we don't have a target upfront either at the moment. As you have observed on many occasions.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Great plan. Just not bother. I hope Parky is thinking along different lines.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Given we've established we don't have the players to pass our way into the box effectively. And we've tried every combination of non Madine strikers we have. What are you suggesting? We've pretty much tried everything. It hasn't worked.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:25 pmGreat plan. Just not bother. I hope Parky is thinking along different lines.
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
#widthhighupthepitch
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
This also....he could also be more positive from the start - could try playing 2 strikers from the start and giving the opposition something to worry about as opposed to him worrying about the opposition all of the time.
And stop firing long balls to a 5ft 9" striker, surrounded by 2 x 6ft plus defenders
If I was PP I'd also be having a word or three with Madine, and I'd tell him what's at stake and to stop being such a soft cnut and play through the pain barrier for the next 3 games
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 2765
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Erm - what?? We've played with two strikers the vast majority of the last 3 months.Peter Thompson wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:18 pm
This also....he could also be more positive from the start - could try playing 2 strikers from the start and giving the opposition something to worry about as opposed to him worrying about the opposition all of the time.
And stop firing long balls to a 5ft 9" striker, surrounded by 2 x 6ft plus defenders
If I was PP I'd also be having a word or three with Madine, and I'd tell him what's at stake and to stop being such a soft cnut and play through the pain barrier for the next 3 games
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
This thread is the Oldham thread is it not....
We started with ALF up front on his own yesterday - hence my comment
We started with ALF up front on his own yesterday - hence my comment
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Our two plans seem to be 1) whack it up top 2) pass it to Morais. If there is no threat down the left then it's all too easy to double up on Morais and drop someone on Alf/Long that's better in the air than either of them.
As BWFCi says, that leaves us scrabbling for a set piece. We need something on our left, even if that is only a notional threat, it get's them guessing a little more and might open the right up a little more.
As BWFCi says, that leaves us scrabbling for a set piece. We need something on our left, even if that is only a notional threat, it get's them guessing a little more and might open the right up a little more.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28701
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Completely agree with all of this. Andy Taylor isn't exactly Garrincha but at least he can link up with others to construct a move, whereas poor old Moxey is a dead shell walking.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:03 pmOur two plans seem to be 1) whack it up top 2) pass it to Morais. If there is no threat down the left then it's all too easy to double up on Morais and drop someone on Alf/Long that's better in the air than either of them.
As BWFCi says, that leaves us scrabbling for a set piece. We need something on our left, even if that is only a notional threat, it get's them guessing a little more and might open the right up a little more.
Out of interest, and backing up your main point, all this harking back to the Total Football days of Clough and Ameobi had me checking the records. According to Tranfermarkt, each of those fine fellows contributed one league assist. Morais is obviously top (12), then Madine (7) and Spearing (6); the only other players to contribute more than one league assist are Vela (2) and Mark Davies (2).
As a statistic assists are somewhat reductive but also instructive. Take out set-pieces (probably the majority of Spearing's input) and the target man, and we've very rarely created that much. I would love to see Sammy (or for that matter Zach) back, but let's not pretend that we have ever been free-flowing, or that Parkinson hasn't done a remarkable job of making a little go a very long way.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Ameobi was our outlet. We haven't got an outlet now. Someone to give the ball to who can hold it, or beat a man under pressure. Hence going up to Madine. Morais is great but not the same halfway line in tight spaces that Ameobi offered.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:23 pmCompletely agree with all of this. Andy Taylor isn't exactly Garrincha but at least he can link up with others to construct a move, whereas poor old Moxey is a dead shell walking.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:03 pmOur two plans seem to be 1) whack it up top 2) pass it to Morais. If there is no threat down the left then it's all too easy to double up on Morais and drop someone on Alf/Long that's better in the air than either of them.
As BWFCi says, that leaves us scrabbling for a set piece. We need something on our left, even if that is only a notional threat, it get's them guessing a little more and might open the right up a little more.
Out of interest, and backing up your main point, all this harking back to the Total Football days of Clough and Ameobi had me checking the records. According to Tranfermarkt, each of those fine fellows contributed one league assist. Morais is obviously top (12), then Madine (7) and Spearing (6); the only other players to contribute more than one league assist are Vela (2) and Mark Davies (2).
As a statistic assists are somewhat reductive but also instructive. Take out set-pieces (probably the majority of Spearing's input) and the target man, and we've very rarely created that much. I would love to see Sammy (or for that matter Zach) back, but let's not pretend that we have ever been free-flowing, or that Parkinson hasn't done a remarkable job of making a little go a very long way.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Also, watching Man Utd vs Chelsea. The team top of English football, struggle when a key player is missing. Just like we do. Not sure that makes Conte a poor manager or a one trick pony. It is just hard to cope without certain players sometimes.
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Pinning it all on Ameobi is a load of shite. Infact pinning it on any one player is for the most part. We, along with every other team not called Sheff Utd, are just not good enough to consistently perform and win games. Early in the season we twatted Gillingham on Sky with Sammy and Clough looking a class apart, but then we went and lost 1-0 at Chesterfield the very next game.
We've been up and down all season, and fortunately for us our last good run came close enough to the end of the season that it should see us home.
We've been up and down all season, and fortunately for us our last good run came close enough to the end of the season that it should see us home.
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Maybe they lost a one off game of football against one of the most expensive teams in the world, coached by one of the most successful managers to have ever lived?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:48 pmAlso, watching Man Utd vs Chelsea. The team top of English football, struggle when a key player is missing. Just like we do. Not sure that makes Conte a poor manager or a one trick pony. It is just hard to cope without certain players sometimes.
But hey, narratives, champions-elect Chelsea are entirely reliant on Marcos Alonso.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Now you're resorting to talking bollocks.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:50 pmAmeobi was our outlet. We haven't got an outlet now. Someone to give the ball to who can hold it, or beat a man under pressure. Hence going up to Madine. Morais is great but not the same halfway line in tight spaces that Ameobi offered.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:23 pmCompletely agree with all of this. Andy Taylor isn't exactly Garrincha but at least he can link up with others to construct a move, whereas poor old Moxey is a dead shell walking.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:03 pmOur two plans seem to be 1) whack it up top 2) pass it to Morais. If there is no threat down the left then it's all too easy to double up on Morais and drop someone on Alf/Long that's better in the air than either of them.
As BWFCi says, that leaves us scrabbling for a set piece. We need something on our left, even if that is only a notional threat, it get's them guessing a little more and might open the right up a little more.
Out of interest, and backing up your main point, all this harking back to the Total Football days of Clough and Ameobi had me checking the records. According to Tranfermarkt, each of those fine fellows contributed one league assist. Morais is obviously top (12), then Madine (7) and Spearing (6); the only other players to contribute more than one league assist are Vela (2) and Mark Davies (2).
As a statistic assists are somewhat reductive but also instructive. Take out set-pieces (probably the majority of Spearing's input) and the target man, and we've very rarely created that much. I would love to see Sammy (or for that matter Zach) back, but let's not pretend that we have ever been free-flowing, or that Parkinson hasn't done a remarkable job of making a little go a very long way.
Look at our goals in March. You're right, Morais doesn't "hold the ball". Morais doesn't need to hold the ball, if instead he's putting on a plate for someone to actually score - which is actually rather more beneficial to us than the ability to "hold the ball". He does also "beat a man under pressure"...
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14056
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
Conditions were tough, and we didn't play to them at all.
One to forget. Hard to pinpoint things, as it really was a warzone type of match.
One to forget. Hard to pinpoint things, as it really was a warzone type of match.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Latic Acid Test. Oldham Athletic - Away. Sat 15th Apr 17 @ 12.30
When deep, you could lump a ball towards Ameobi, he often could bring it under control, turn and run at teams, getting us out.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:14 pmNow you're resorting to talking bollocks.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:50 pmAmeobi was our outlet. We haven't got an outlet now. Someone to give the ball to who can hold it, or beat a man under pressure. Hence going up to Madine. Morais is great but not the same halfway line in tight spaces that Ameobi offered.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:23 pmCompletely agree with all of this. Andy Taylor isn't exactly Garrincha but at least he can link up with others to construct a move, whereas poor old Moxey is a dead shell walking.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:03 pmOur two plans seem to be 1) whack it up top 2) pass it to Morais. If there is no threat down the left then it's all too easy to double up on Morais and drop someone on Alf/Long that's better in the air than either of them.
As BWFCi says, that leaves us scrabbling for a set piece. We need something on our left, even if that is only a notional threat, it get's them guessing a little more and might open the right up a little more.
Out of interest, and backing up your main point, all this harking back to the Total Football days of Clough and Ameobi had me checking the records. According to Tranfermarkt, each of those fine fellows contributed one league assist. Morais is obviously top (12), then Madine (7) and Spearing (6); the only other players to contribute more than one league assist are Vela (2) and Mark Davies (2).
As a statistic assists are somewhat reductive but also instructive. Take out set-pieces (probably the majority of Spearing's input) and the target man, and we've very rarely created that much. I would love to see Sammy (or for that matter Zach) back, but let's not pretend that we have ever been free-flowing, or that Parkinson hasn't done a remarkable job of making a little go a very long way.
Look at our goals in March. You're right, Morais doesn't "hold the ball". Morais doesn't need to hold the ball, if instead he's putting on a plate for someone to actually score - which is actually rather more beneficial to us than the ability to "hold the ball". He does also "beat a man under pressure"...
Morais isn't the same kind of player. His end product is far better than Ameobi's.
Not sure anything is controversial about that.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests