Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
I think it's a bit of both. It's a lot harder to do it with two, but not impossible if you have the right people.GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:13 amIt's not.
At the start of the season we were far and away the best pressing outfit.
Where that fell down was when we lost Dion and Vic. None of the replacements could do the work. Without one key pressing player it worked, without both it didn't.
It was personnel, not structure. Oxford without two of their front three would be exactly the same story with their counter attacking football.
If we go into next season with Dion, Vic, Collins and Dan that's 4 who can do the work (hamstrings allowing). Rather than the two we had this season due to Dan's injury and then zero for a while whilst Collins learnt it.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
The reality is that anyone on a 2025 deal is available unless and until they sign a new contract.
Anyone on longer than that leaves on our terms.
Whatever formation/system Ian picks some business will just be business.
Anyone on longer than that leaves on our terms.
Whatever formation/system Ian picks some business will just be business.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Can honestly say hand on heart I’ve never once seen us press as effectively as Oxford did against us. They shut the game down completely. The closest is arguably Barnsley away but even that at times was more one going. The Oxford press was a whole team, executed perfectly with that narrow front three.GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:13 amIt's not.
At the start of the season we were far and away the best pressing outfit.
Where that fell down was when we lost Dion and Vic. None of the replacements could do the work. Without one key pressing player it worked, without both it didn't.
It was personnel, not structure. Oxford without two of their front three would be exactly the same story with their counter attacking football.
If we go into next season with Dion, Vic, Collins and Dan that's 4 who can do the work (hamstrings allowing). Rather than the two we had this season due to Dan's injury and then zero for a while whilst Collins learnt it.
It didn’t rely on individuals running themselves into the ground…not saying there wasn’t a lot of work in it but felt very much more effective than when we have done it.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Two teams. Oxford pressed well but we didn’t ask any different questions. They could have done it for hours on end.
On another topic du jour - I would not be confident of top two if our RWB options are Cogz, Matheson, Jones. If we go back four, maybe (although we’d need a tall LB as none of those are grrrrrreat in the air).
FYI I will update Contract Expiry thread tomorrow - not on the computer today and I ain’t doing that fiddly shite on a phone
On another topic du jour - I would not be confident of top two if our RWB options are Cogz, Matheson, Jones. If we go back four, maybe (although we’d need a tall LB as none of those are grrrrrreat in the air).
FYI I will update Contract Expiry thread tomorrow - not on the computer today and I ain’t doing that fiddly shite on a phone
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32756
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
The problem is not that our press is more ineffective than Oxfords' - as Ghost says over the season, it's not - our Opta PPDA still has us as top, Oxford 4th bottom. But that's where the lies, damned lies and statistics come into play. In a one-off game, or even across the play-off, they might have been better than us on those occasions. Our problems are not about generalities, they're about specifics - which is why the 121 goals doesn't actually count for much (nor necessarily the 51 against).GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:13 amIt's not.
At the start of the season we were far and away the best pressing outfit.
Where that fell down was when we lost Dion and Vic. None of the replacements could do the work. Without one key pressing player it worked, without both it didn't.
It was personnel, not structure. Oxford without two of their front three would be exactly the same story with their counter attacking football.
If we go into next season with Dion, Vic, Collins and Dan that's 4 who can do the work (hamstrings allowing). Rather than the two we had this season due to Dan's injury and then zero for a while whilst Collins learnt it.
Our problems are about things like "why did we go on holiday vs Wigan at home?" "How the feck do you get gubbed by the bottom team in the league at home?" "How do you have 69% possession and only one more shot on target against Wigan away, losing 1-0." "How do you have 60% possession against Derby and they have more shots, more on target than you do"
Last edited by Worthy4England on Wed May 22, 2024 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14100
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
IredaleDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:36 amOn another topic du jour - I would not be confident of top two if our RWB options are Cogz, Matheson, Jones. If we go back four, maybe (although we’d need a tall LB as none of those are grrrrrreat in the air).
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Totals (goals scored, goals conceded) and averages (PPDA etc) will always be generalised. As you say, one-offs can be different - IF the manager has flexibility.
Over the last two years we have got better at being different teams on different occasions - home to low blocks, away to big nasty teams. But again, as with the big rare switches between back three and back four, that feels “systemic” and closely planned rather than cleverly adapting on the hoof. Better than nothing but we still seem paralysed by surprise, and it’s something we have to get better at.
Over the last two years we have got better at being different teams on different occasions - home to low blocks, away to big nasty teams. But again, as with the big rare switches between back three and back four, that feels “systemic” and closely planned rather than cleverly adapting on the hoof. Better than nothing but we still seem paralysed by surprise, and it’s something we have to get better at.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Every expert who talks about us (managers, techy pundits, etc) praise Evatt's press. I'm not wasting time on that topic. If you think the whole of football is wrong then I'm hardly going to convince you otherwise.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Yep, decent for that, but then that’s four “defenders” rather than three.officer_dibble wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:40 amIredaleDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:36 amOn another topic du jour - I would not be confident of top two if our RWB options are Cogz, Matheson, Jones. If we go back four, maybe (although we’d need a tall LB as none of those are grrrrrreat in the air).
Say we play a low block long ball team at home… are we hobbling ourselves?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32756
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
That question sits well both ways with 51 leaked at our end. Does a three hobble us? Sorta toucheDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:45 amYep, decent for that, but then that’s four “defenders” rather than three.officer_dibble wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:40 amIredaleDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:36 amOn another topic du jour - I would not be confident of top two if our RWB options are Cogz, Matheson, Jones. If we go back four, maybe (although we’d need a tall LB as none of those are grrrrrreat in the air).
Say we play a low block long ball team at home… are we hobbling ourselves?
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Bucks set up ideally to beat us and Evatt didn't to beat Oxford.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:38 amThe problem is not that our press is more ineffective than Oxfords' - as Ghost says over the season, it's not - our Opta PPDA still has us as top, Oxford 4th bottom. But that's where the lies, damned lies and statistics come into play. In a one-off game, or even across the play-off, they might have been better than us on those occasions. Our problems are not about generalities, they're about specifics - which is why the 121 goals doesn't actually count for much (nor necessarily the 51 against).
Our problems are about things like "why did we go on holiday vs Wigan at home?" "How the feck do you get gubbed by the bottom team in the league at home?" "How do you have 69% possession and only one more shot on target against Wigan away, losing 1-0." "How do you have 60% possession against Derby and they have more shots, more on target than you do"
I got stick for saying that after the game, but it's the reality.
The main thing that has me occasionally leaning "sack him" is his bullshit instance he set the players up properly to beat that Oxford side, playing that way.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32756
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Abundantly clear that Oxford had the drop on us. As it was on other occasions in the main season.GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:49 amBucks set up ideally to beat us and Evatt didn't to beat Oxford.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:38 amThe problem is not that our press is more ineffective than Oxfords' - as Ghost says over the season, it's not - our Opta PPDA still has us as top, Oxford 4th bottom. But that's where the lies, damned lies and statistics come into play. In a one-off game, or even across the play-off, they might have been better than us on those occasions. Our problems are not about generalities, they're about specifics - which is why the 121 goals doesn't actually count for much (nor necessarily the 51 against).
Our problems are about things like "why did we go on holiday vs Wigan at home?" "How the feck do you get gubbed by the bottom team in the league at home?" "How do you have 69% possession and only one more shot on target against Wigan away, losing 1-0." "How do you have 60% possession against Derby and they have more shots, more on target than you do"
I got stick for saying that after the game, but it's the reality.
The main thing that has me occasionally leaning "sack him" is his bullshit instance he set the players up properly to beat that Oxford side, playing that way.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Sure but the season before, we broke low concession records with a back three. Besides, I’m not advocating against the back four, just saying the personnel balance within it needs a lot of careful consideration. Same of any formation of course (can we please stop playing Toal LCB?) but we do at the moment have a good balance of CB options. Not sure same is true of FB (and definitely not WB).Worthy4England wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:48 amThat question sits well both ways with 51 leaked at our end. Does a three hobble us? Sorta toucheDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:45 amYep, decent for that, but then that’s four “defenders” rather than three.officer_dibble wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:40 amIredaleDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:36 amOn another topic du jour - I would not be confident of top two if our RWB options are Cogz, Matheson, Jones. If we go back four, maybe (although we’d need a tall LB as none of those are grrrrrreat in the air).
Say we play a low block long ball team at home… are we hobbling ourselves?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
We conceded very few goals the season before but we had Bradley who defensively is premier league level, when he didn’t play Jones would play there who is a more defensive option, often Iredale on the left till he got injured another sort of defensive type. We had a more physical shield for the back three with Morley or MJ Williams and were a more defensively robust team at the expense of our attacking play.
The issue is whether you can play a back three high line and have wing backs who do the business going forward and can ensure you don’t concede a bagful at this level. I don’t really think it’s likely.
Even Bradley an outstanding footballer struggled to be consistent going forwards here with his delivery.
The issue is whether you can play a back three high line and have wing backs who do the business going forward and can ensure you don’t concede a bagful at this level. I don’t really think it’s likely.
Even Bradley an outstanding footballer struggled to be consistent going forwards here with his delivery.
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Evatt's ability to organise a team is first rate for this level.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:52 amAbundantly clear that Oxford had the drop on us. As it was on other occasions in the main season.
His ability to react when his gameplan doesn't work is not.
At least we know where he needs to improve.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14100
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
What I keep coming back to is he refused to change it at half time. feck me if that wasn’t the time to go all Bruce Rioch when is? Should have put Victor and probably Dempsey on for jones and Sheehan and made them think. But we did not. We said ‘do plan a better’. Arghhhhhhhhhhh!GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:49 amBucks set up ideally to beat us and Evatt didn't to beat Oxford.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:38 amThe problem is not that our press is more ineffective than Oxfords' - as Ghost says over the season, it's not - our Opta PPDA still has us as top, Oxford 4th bottom. But that's where the lies, damned lies and statistics come into play. In a one-off game, or even across the play-off, they might have been better than us on those occasions. Our problems are not about generalities, they're about specifics - which is why the 121 goals doesn't actually count for much (nor necessarily the 51 against).
Our problems are about things like "why did we go on holiday vs Wigan at home?" "How the feck do you get gubbed by the bottom team in the league at home?" "How do you have 69% possession and only one more shot on target against Wigan away, losing 1-0." "How do you have 60% possession against Derby and they have more shots, more on target than you do"
I got stick for saying that after the game, but it's the reality.
The main thing that has me occasionally leaning "sack him" is his bullshit instance he set the players up properly to beat that Oxford side, playing that way.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32756
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
This season, had we gone up, we'd have been the second highest GA (by 2) out of the last 5 years' promoted teams - I didn't look further back. We need to look at the game in both dimensions, not just the one. Our GD improved by 9, which is commendable, but not good enough in the final analysis.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:54 amSure but the season before, we broke low concession records with a back three. Besides, I’m not advocating against the back four, just saying the personnel balance within it needs a lot of careful consideration. Same of any formation of course (can we please stop playing Toal LCB?) but we do at the moment have a good balance of CB options. Not sure same is true of FB (and definitely not WB).Worthy4England wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:48 amThat question sits well both ways with 51 leaked at our end. Does a three hobble us? Sorta toucheDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:45 amYep, decent for that, but then that’s four “defenders” rather than three.officer_dibble wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:40 amIredaleDave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 11:36 amOn another topic du jour - I would not be confident of top two if our RWB options are Cogz, Matheson, Jones. If we go back four, maybe (although we’d need a tall LB as none of those are grrrrrreat in the air).
Say we play a low block long ball team at home… are we hobbling ourselves?
- GhostoftheBok
- Legend
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:51 pm
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Tactically the game should have changed after about 20-30 minutes. 2 subs and a basic midfield tweak removes a lot of the impediments our lot faced, mentality notwithstanding.officer_dibble wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 12:04 pmWhat I keep coming back to is he refused to change it at half time. feck me if that wasn’t the time to go all Bruce Rioch when is? Should have put Victor and probably Dempsey on for jones and Sheehan and made them think. But we did not. We said ‘do plan a better’. Arghhhhhhhhhhh!
Evatt has "learnt from the best", but he's not gone beyond the book. He can do the multiple choice, but struggles with the essay questions.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Indeed, which is why (like I said) we need balance in both formation and personnel. Last two seasons we’ve moved the dial from “good defence but attack not good enough” to “(intermittently) good attack but defence not good enough”. Does a back four fix that? Might depend who’s in it.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Tooling up: The summer 2024 transfer thread
Yep. Pep might well have made a change. Upsetting for the subbed lad(s) but it’s a team game.GhostoftheBok wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 12:10 pmTactically the game should have changed after about 20-30 minutes. 2 subs and a basic midfield tweak removes a lot of the impediments our lot faced, mentality notwithstanding.officer_dibble wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 12:04 pmWhat I keep coming back to is he refused to change it at half time. feck me if that wasn’t the time to go all Bruce Rioch when is? Should have put Victor and probably Dempsey on for jones and Sheehan and made them think. But we did not. We said ‘do plan a better’. Arghhhhhhhhhhh!
Evatt has "learnt from the best", but he's not gone beyond the book. He can do the multiple choice, but struggles with the essay questions.
Also speaks to the lack of flexibility. Had we been well versed in a back four system then it would be relatively simple to slip into a well-practised alternative. Not that it’s all about formations but it helps ask different questions.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 158 guests