Smackems v The Trotters
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Promising
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:34 pm
- Location: Seoul
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
you're right, perhaps expecting Taylor to score AND have a clean sheet was too much in one game...HMX wrote:And a clean sheet?midnitefooty wrote:Woah... unexpected lineup. CYL finally being given a rest eh?jmjhb wrote:Wanderers: Jaaskelainen, Ricketts, Cahill, Knight, Robinson, Taylor, Muamba, Holden, Petrov, Elmander, Kevin Davies (Subs: Bogdan, Cohen, Rodrigo, Chung-Yong, Klasnic, Steinsson, Blake)
I'm going for a 2-0. Elmander and Taylor (finally) to score.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43324
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Whole lot of the Mackems, Bruce included, are playing the ref for all its worth. Cahill yellow card for getting the ball, stripes going downlike snowflakes and if we when a header, grab your face. That save was uttely incredibel, certain goal but for it. Their defence are playing us well enough. We need plan B. Ref will give us nothing as usual so get with it lads and go for it.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Shocking, shocking, shocking.HMX wrote:And a clean sheet?midnitefooty wrote:Woah... unexpected lineup. CYL finally being given a rest eh?jmjhb wrote:Wanderers: Jaaskelainen, Ricketts, Cahill, Knight, Robinson, Taylor, Muamba, Holden, Petrov, Elmander, Kevin Davies (Subs: Bogdan, Cohen, Rodrigo, Chung-Yong, Klasnic, Steinsson, Blake)
I'm going for a 2-0. Elmander and Taylor (finally) to score.
Cohen in first 18 ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: North London, originally Farnworth
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Three minutes stoppage time! He's having a laugh!
Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man and let history make up its own mind.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Oh and David Seaman's save was better cause it wasn't against us! lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEXlrQlR28M" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEXlrQlR28M" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Agreed - think they've had eight clean sheets (fancy!) and they seem solid in the middle. I'd give Petrov and Taylor the first 15 then consider slinging Lee and Rodrigo at them to exploit those full-backs - right-footer Bardsley at left-back, midfielder El Mohamady at right-back.TANGODANCER wrote:Their defence are playing us well enough. We need plan B.
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Yeah, Ricketts has been stuck trying (and failing) to get to grips with Welbeck. Need CYL's workrate and assistance with overlapping there.hisroyalgingerness wrote:http://plixi.com/p/63736499
Average positions. Too narrow, haven't got at the full backs enough
"Any useless person; any liar; any drunkard; anyone under the influence; anyone high on drugs; can talk on the Internet, and you read what he writes and you believe it."
- Muammar Gaddafi, 16/1/2011
- Muammar Gaddafi, 16/1/2011
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:36 pm
- Location: On the sidelines, having a beer
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Only good thing so far is watching the thing ok Danish tv for once. Claus Jensen assisting the commentator - and with a slight Bolton bias. Don't see that too often.
Oh coitus!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
So.. Petrov back on the right... then..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Fourth-choice central midfielder, and Mavis is banned. Fair enough.bobo the clown wrote:Shocking, shocking, shocking.
Cohen in first 18 ?
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
1 word . CHEAT!
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Ref has completely bottled that what a nice person
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
What a cunk Steve Bruce is..
Cattermole should be in the bath..
Cattermole should be in the bath..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
0 reds this season. Explains alot.spikeykev wrote:Ref has completely bottled that what a tw*t
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Disgusting. And I'm not just talking Twattermole.
"Any useless person; any liar; any drunkard; anyone under the influence; anyone high on drugs; can talk on the Internet, and you read what he writes and you believe it."
- Muammar Gaddafi, 16/1/2011
- Muammar Gaddafi, 16/1/2011
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Yeah bottled no doubt about it. We're not looking very clever here I'm afraid, some really poor passing and little movement
And why are we the only club I watch where a throw in is a gift of ball back to the opposition
Petrov to come off for Lee or Rodrigo for me
And why are we the only club I watch where a throw in is a gift of ball back to the opposition
Petrov to come off for Lee or Rodrigo for me
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
Petrov has to come off soon.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Smackems v The Trotters
It's pretty clear that Bruce & Coyle don't get on. Not only did we not get the usual "isn't he great" shite but the "they're still long-ball" plus they are in each other's faces throughout this.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests