No Jackett required?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by ChrisC » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:17 pm

What was with Lomas subbing their mains threats? Easter was quick and got their goal and the other lad was tricky and driving them forward.

Baffled me. Didn't stop moaning all game and a guy infront of me ended up screaming at him for constantly hassling the linesman.

Lomas moans almost as much as Beckford ;)

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:19 pm

LeverEnd wrote:2nd goal the ball was being passed sideways at the back and I was shouting at Mills to hoof it, when he passed it fcuking backwards to Ream who passed it, got it back and then threaded Beckford through
Hmmmmm
Sto ut Serviam

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by ChrisC » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:20 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.

Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Have a said otherwise? I was just asking SF a question out of interest.

I personally don't like Freedman's style of score and sit back. Credit to DF for turning things round though in recent weeks.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:21 pm

BL3 wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.
Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Talk us through Ream's performance today.
Ream was very good

Hats off to the manager and his staff
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:24 pm

BL3 wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.
Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Talk us through Ream's performance today.
What?
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:28 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
BL3 wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.
Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Talk us through Ream's performance today.
What?
I'm not sure I quite expressed just what a fckingwanker you really are. Toss off.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32624
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:33 pm

It's fairly straightforward LLS, if we win it's coz of an Owen Coyle signing, if we lose Freedman is shit.

It's like being 14 all over again.

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:35 pm

Worthy4England wrote:It's fairly straightforward LLS, if we win it's coz of an Owen Coyle signing, if we lose Freedman is shit.

It's like being 14 all over again.
I'm glad you pointed that out Worthy... I've got Ancient Fart syndrome, you know, the one where you actually celebrate having a feckin' win. :D
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by BL3 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:36 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
BL3 wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.
Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Talk us through Ream's performance today.
Ream was very good

Hats off to the manager and his staff
Yes, 'hats off' to him for adopting a system that requires us to pass it around at the back and then finally picking our best footballing centre half in that position, nine games into the season.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32624
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:37 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:It's fairly straightforward LLS, if we win it's coz of an Owen Coyle signing, if we lose Freedman is shit.

It's like being 14 all over again.
I'm glad you pointed that out Worthy... I've git Ancient Fart syndrome, you know, the one where you actually celebrate having a feckin' win. :D
I'm going to celebrate having a win too. :-)

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1924
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:39 pm

Trying to figure out where we are on the form table if you use the past 6 games, looks like 3rd to me after today's result. :shock:
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by BL3 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:41 pm

Armchair Wanderer wrote:Trying to figure out where we are on the form table if you use the past 6 games, looks like 3rd to me after today's result. :shock:
Millwall have replaced Bournemouth at the bottom. No wins in their last six games.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1924
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:43 pm

BL3 wrote:
Armchair Wanderer wrote:Trying to figure out where we are on the form table if you use the past 6 games, looks like 3rd to me after today's result. :shock:
Millwall have replaced Bournemouth at the bottom. No wins in their last six games.
They might have a chance to win next week :lol: or the week after...
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:43 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:2nd goal the ball was being passed sideways at the back and I was shouting at Mills to hoof it, when he passed it fcuking backwards to Ream who passed it, got it back and then threaded Beckford through
Hmmmmm
What are you getting at? And why have you added to my quote? Not sure what point you are trying to make.
...

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by BL3 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:56 pm

Worthy4England wrote:It's fairly straightforward LLS, if we win it's coz of an Owen Coyle signing, if we lose Freedman is shit. It's like being 14 all over again.
I thought you were 14. That's the only explanation i can offer for your contributions. SF is one of the few on here who actually rated Ream. Perhaps if you paid attention you might learn something.

SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by SmokinFrazier » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:58 pm

ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.

Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
I think he still has a lot to learn, though if our results continue to be solid, it'd probably be counter productive to sack him. Hopefully things do continue to work for us.

Glad you enjoyed the game, mate.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32624
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:59 pm

BL3 wrote:
Armchair Wanderer wrote:Trying to figure out where we are on the form table if you use the past 6 games, looks like 3rd to me after today's result. :shock:
Millwall have replaced Bournemouth at the bottom. No wins in their last six games.
But they weren't at the bottom before we kicked off. They had the same sort of form as Brighton. Talk about trying to make utter bollocks fit your argument.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32624
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:00 pm

BL3 wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:It's fairly straightforward LLS, if we win it's coz of an Owen Coyle signing, if we lose Freedman is shit. It's like being 14 all over again.
I thought you were 14. That's the only explanation i can offer for your contributions. SF is one of the few on here who actually rated Ream. Perhaps if you paid attention you might learn something.
Yawn.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:03 pm

blimey this is tedious - but I blame Chris for un-necessarily inviting it with the come-on he threw at SF...

can't we just be happy for an evening without an outbreak of accusation and willy-waving??? we won - fecking 3-1!!!

BL3
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:15 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by BL3 » Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:04 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Armchair Wanderer wrote:Trying to figure out where we are on the form table if you use the past 6 games, looks like 3rd to me after today's result. :shock:
Millwall have replaced Bournemouth at the bottom. No wins in their last six games.
But they weren't at the bottom before we kicked off. They had the same sort of form as Brighton. Talk about trying to make utter bollocks fit your argument.
Except Brighton won their last game. Millwall last won six games ago before today.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests