Question about a fan takeover
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Question about a fan takeover
throwawayboltonian wrote:Let's hope so, but this has just appeared on the Beeb feed:Athers wrote:With vast majority of the debt owed to ED rather than the bank or HMRC I'd say administration is unlikely. I'd think that ED would rather sell for an £Xm amount than end up with a mess, -10pts and eventually being offered 1p in the £1 for his debt anyway.
"Lennon told BBC Radio Manchester the club could be facing administration if the process isn't hurried along, and also said he's hoping Gartside makes a speedy recovery, as his own job as manager has been made more difficult with the chairman absent."
how does garty's absence make Lenny's job harder?
hmmmm... how confident are we that without eddie putting cash in, we can afford to pay the players? If we can't - then things start to go pear-shaped quite fast...
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Similar to the fire-sale concept. If we fail to pay them then VERY quickly the players can act like free agents. Now ... Trotter doing that is all well & good. But there are a few with a value.thebish wrote:throwawayboltonian wrote:Let's hope so, but this has just appeared on the Beeb feed:Athers wrote:With vast majority of the debt owed to ED rather than the bank or HMRC I'd say administration is unlikely. I'd think that ED would rather sell for an £Xm amount than end up with a mess, -10pts and eventually being offered 1p in the £1 for his debt anyway.
"Lennon told BBC Radio Manchester the club could be facing administration if the process isn't hurried along, and also said he's hoping Gartside makes a speedy recovery, as his own job as manager has been made more difficult with the chairman absent."
how does garty's absence make Lenny's job harder?
hmmmm... how confident are we that without eddie putting cash in, we can afford to pay the players? If we can't - then things start to go pear-shaped quite fast...
Again, this would only happen if ED is utterly incapable of mustering up some money. Money he may prefer not to stump up but which would prevent players waking out.
Hey, we're clearly in a bad way ... but the benefit of a single owner is that he can't simply walk without doing himself massive damage.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Question about a fan takeover
I quite like the sudden talk of urgency - I'm not in the ANYBODY WILL DO camp - but it would be great to get out of this limbo-world we've been fogging about in for so long...
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Well, neither of the last two sets of accounts have had clean opinions from the auditors re: Going Concern.Worthy4England wrote:Looking at the situation regarding administration, there are debts we owe that aren't to ED. Due within one year, according to the 2014 Accounts, we had £11m of loans and overdrafts. £3m in Trade Creditors. £2m to the tax man. £3.8m in deferred income (season ticket monies that we'd received and accounted for, but are actually a forward revenue), and £17m in accruals - Grand total £38m. I suspect the accrual is in relation to Moonshift Investments, but can't be sure....
If we assumed it was, we're still £20m in the hock. Which would be more than enough without anyone putting cash in, to send us into admin.
Each has said 'The audit report states that there is uncertainty concerning the company being a 'going concern'' Which presumably is down to Eddie Davies not giving them the assurance needed via a letter from the parent company. I've said before the debt isn't an issue (apart from that bit to external creditors Worthy mentioned), it's all about the cash flow. The debt added each year is essentially the difference between Cash In and Cash Out, with ED financing the difference with a cash injection. The amounts of the last few years are pretty staggering. £20-£25m per annum for the last five years. There'll be those that say 'ah, yeah, but it's a tax swindle! It's not really costing him anything!'. Now, I'm not a tax specialist, but that's bollocks. There isn't a financial adviser in the world who'd say investing your money in a football club was a good idea.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Worthy4England wrote:Looking at the situation regarding administration, there are debts we owe that aren't to ED. Due within one year, according to the 2014 Accounts, we had £11m of loans and overdrafts. £3m in Trade Creditors. £2m to the tax man. £3.8m in deferred income (season ticket monies that we'd received and accounted for, but are actually a forward revenue), and £17m in accruals - Grand total £38m. I suspect the accrual is in relation to Moonshift Investments, but can't be sure....
If we assumed it was, we're still £20m in the hock. Which would be more than enough without anyone putting cash in, to send us into admin.
that represents a larger amount (owed to people other than Eddie) than I had imagined it to be! cripes!
Re: Question about a fan takeover
£3mill in trade creditors = HUUUUUUUUUUGE stock of pies to offload.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Question about a fan takeover
There's 3 or 4 of us could have a go at clearing that !thebish wrote:£3mill in trade creditors = HUUUUUUUUUUGE stock of pies to offload.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Question about a fan takeover
I think we should all do our bit!bobo the clown wrote:There's 3 or 4 of us could have a go at clearing that !thebish wrote:£3mill in trade creditors = HUUUUUUUUUUGE stock of pies to offload.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Hang on, could that explain why the players are a bit slow off the markbobo the clown wrote:There's 3 or 4 of us could have a go at clearing that !thebish wrote:£3mill in trade creditors = HUUUUUUUUUUGE stock of pies to offload.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32716
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Never thought I'd say this, but we might need Trotter back...Aanvalluh wrote:Hang on, could that explain why the players are a bit slow off the markbobo the clown wrote:There's 3 or 4 of us could have a go at clearing that !thebish wrote:£3mill in trade creditors = HUUUUUUUUUUGE stock of pies to offload.
Re: Question about a fan takeover
You read some comments on Twitter, news articles etc, that seem to assume that the people coming in will be not just be saviours but will splash the cash too. I'd be surprised if the cost cutting didn't continue, as we have contracted players on wages we can't afford. Medo, for example, who Lennon has never given a chance to and no-one else wants either. I'd like to bet that whatever the reduced wages are that the likes of Wheater, Pratley and Davies are on, they aren't reduced enough for our current situation. Parachute payments go soon and with them any chance of a quick return to the Prem. Whatever happens with the takeover I think we'll still remain much closer to (or in) League 1 than the Prem for the foreseeable future.
Have a nice day everyone!
Have a nice day everyone!
...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36405
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Which is why I struggle to see anyone with sense buying us right now.....LeverEnd wrote:You read some comments on Twitter, news articles etc, that seem to assume that the people coming in will be not just be saviours but will splash the cash too. I'd be surprised if the cost cutting didn't continue, as we have contracted players on wages we can't afford. Medo, for example, who Lennon has never given a chance to and no-one else wants either. I'd like to bet that whatever the reduced wages are that the likes of Wheater, Pratley and Davies are on, they aren't reduced enough for our current situation. Parachute payments go soon and with them any chance of a quick return to the Prem. Whatever happens with the takeover I think we'll still remain much closer to (or in) League 1 than the Prem for the foreseeable future.
Have a nice day everyone!
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Question about a fan takeover
thebish wrote:I think we should all do our bit!bobo the clown wrote:There's 3 or 4 of us could have a go at clearing that !thebish wrote:£3mill in trade creditors = HUUUUUUUUUUGE stock of pies to offload.
Now we're talking!
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Yep, totally mental and not gonna happen. The focus has to be on a responsible rebuild and more cost-cutting.LeverEnd wrote:You read some comments on Twitter, news articles etc, that seem to assume that the people coming in will be not just be saviours but will splash the cash too. I'd be surprised if the cost cutting didn't continue, as we have contracted players on wages we can't afford. Medo, for example, who Lennon has never given a chance to and no-one else wants either. I'd like to bet that whatever the reduced wages are that the likes of Wheater, Pratley and Davies are on, they aren't reduced enough for our current situation. Parachute payments go soon and with them any chance of a quick return to the Prem. Whatever happens with the takeover I think we'll still remain much closer to (or in) League 1 than the Prem for the foreseeable future.
Have a nice day everyone!
Re: Question about a fan takeover
LeverEnd wrote:You read some comments on Twitter, news articles etc, that seem to assume that the people coming in will be not just be saviours but will splash the cash too. I'd be surprised if the cost cutting didn't continue, as we have contracted players on wages we can't afford. Medo, for example, who Lennon has never given a chance to and no-one else wants either. I'd like to bet that whatever the reduced wages are that the likes of Wheater, Pratley and Davies are on, they aren't reduced enough for our current situation. Parachute payments go soon and with them any chance of a quick return to the Prem. Whatever happens with the takeover I think we'll still remain much closer to (or in) League 1 than the Prem for the foreseeable future.
Have a nice day everyone!
stoppit - we're all giddy and you will not stop us being giddy!!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am
Re: Question about a fan takeover
You could see why ppotential investors would see us as a great opportunity though. If they did spend big and got us promoted, they'd get back their investment with the new TV deal and, unlike most Championship clubs, we're an established Premier League team and more attractive to an investor than a club without our stadium, training ground and other facilities. Davies has spent a lot on the club but not all of it was wasted, there's plenty been spent on the club that will be attractive to anyone looking to buy him out. I think the problem is that getting to the Premier Leagu is a big, expensive gamble and the Championship is a difficult division to spend your way out of.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Question about a fan takeover
^^ Back to being giddy .... & I like it.
ta Smokin'
ta Smokin'
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Question about a fan takeover
SmokinFrazier wrote:You could see why ppotential investors would see us as a great opportunity though. If they did spend big and got us promoted, they'd get back their investment with the new TV deal and, unlike most Championship clubs, we're an established Premier League team and more attractive to an investor than a club without our stadium, training ground and other facilities. Davies has spent a lot on the club but not all of it was wasted, there's plenty been spent on the club that will be attractive to anyone looking to buy him out. I think the problem is that getting to the Premier Leagu is a big, expensive gamble and the Championship is a difficult division to spend your way out of.
fortunately we have Lenny - so with the cash, promotion is pretty much a given!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32716
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Yes, coz he's a tactical God!thebish wrote:SmokinFrazier wrote:You could see why ppotential investors would see us as a great opportunity though. If they did spend big and got us promoted, they'd get back their investment with the new TV deal and, unlike most Championship clubs, we're an established Premier League team and more attractive to an investor than a club without our stadium, training ground and other facilities. Davies has spent a lot on the club but not all of it was wasted, there's plenty been spent on the club that will be attractive to anyone looking to buy him out. I think the problem is that getting to the Premier Leagu is a big, expensive gamble and the Championship is a difficult division to spend your way out of.
fortunately we have Lenny - so with the cash, promotion is pretty much a given!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36405
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Question about a fan takeover
Aye. You're bound to make money in the premiership. Just ask Eddie.....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 107 guests