Wigan, away.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Wigan, away.
I noticed Mjällby was a permanent fixture in the technical area at the Millwall game, certainly in the second half. This says to me that NL has delegated and given him an amount of responsibility for defending. I have no idea how any of the managers work but this strikes me as a good thing, and might not have happened under some previous managers.Jonah wrote:Me too pru ! But I think there's a bit more substance to our latest management set up . Lennon doesn't appear delusion and isn't showing any signs of depressive symptoms yet .Prufrock wrote:It happened under Allardyce and he fixed it. Hopefully Lennon can too. Am convinced Lennon is the best we've had since Allardyce and that he will...though I got v excited about Coyle and to a lesser extent Freedman too, so what do I know...
Anything like that happen today? Not that it helped!
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Wigan, away.
Whilst I get trotters under contract and Lennon is hoping he'll perform. But I do think the man is gash.
Twilight mentioned about him touching the ball only a handful of times. I remember thinking during the game that the commentators iirc did not mention him once and I checked the team sheet to see if he was playing.
Honest
Twilight mentioned about him touching the ball only a handful of times. I remember thinking during the game that the commentators iirc did not mention him once and I checked the team sheet to see if he was playing.
Honest
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:13 pm
- Location: Fleetwood
Re: Wigan, away.
ask Barry Bannan not me!Enoch wrote:In Lennon's first 15 league games we conceded a dozen goals and the new regime were lauded for the transformation.
The next 13 have yielded 28 and the coaching staff bear no responsibility!
We like Lennon, in some way he pleases the eye, makes us feel good, so it must be the players at fault.
To consider otherwise as a possibility would be ridiculous.
Why so black and white, (what's wrong with a bit of grey?)
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Wigan, away.
Lennon mentioned the reason why Vela didn't start was because he's struggled with a slight injury this week.
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Wigan, away.
While that's true, if it were Freedman conceding late goal after late goal, he'd currently be doing it on the back of a run of shit away results, plus a run of shit home results whilst rock bottom of the table. And with really, really greasy hair.Jugs wrote:I have some sympathy for Bish. If this was Freedman in charge, with his team conceding late goal after late goal, he'd have been lynched.
Lennon is currently conceding late goal after late goal while at least holding a fair run of home results and we're safe. Ok, he's ginger; but no one's perfect.
Businesswoman of the year.
Re: Wigan, away.
It's not Lennon's fault that the players he inherited are mentally weak. The late goal thing starts and ends there for me. Unless he scares them into making late mistakes with his aggressive nature, which is unlikely, and would still indicate mental weakness.
However he is certainly responsible for picking a weak midfield that doesn't protect a vulnerable defence, all within a system that repeatedly doesn't work. He had to pick trotter today, but should have had the physical presence of Coke alongside him behind rochina, not a lightweight like Bannan. The late goal wouldn't have mattered if we'd got our just deserts during the match.
He reminds me of the latter days of coyle with some of these midfield selections, although clearly he hasn't the same options. He's not managing flat track bullies on the spl now.
I like him, am glad we got him and want him to do well of course but he's not beyond criticism.
However he is certainly responsible for picking a weak midfield that doesn't protect a vulnerable defence, all within a system that repeatedly doesn't work. He had to pick trotter today, but should have had the physical presence of Coke alongside him behind rochina, not a lightweight like Bannan. The late goal wouldn't have mattered if we'd got our just deserts during the match.
He reminds me of the latter days of coyle with some of these midfield selections, although clearly he hasn't the same options. He's not managing flat track bullies on the spl now.
I like him, am glad we got him and want him to do well of course but he's not beyond criticism.
...
Re: Wigan, away.
that's the clincher!CrazyHorse wrote:While that's true, if it were Freedman conceding late goal after late goal, he'd currently be doing it on the back of a run of shit away results, plus a run of shit home results whilst rock bottom of the table. And with really, really greasy hair.Jugs wrote:I have some sympathy for Bish. If this was Freedman in charge, with his team conceding late goal after late goal, he'd have been lynched.
Lennon is currently conceding late goal after late goal while at least holding a fair run of home results and we're safe. Ok, he's ginger; but no one's perfect.
Re: Wigan, away.
What about doing it on the back of stubbornly sticking with 3-5-2, though?CrazyHorse wrote:While that's true, if it were Freedman conceding late goal after late goal, he'd currently be doing it on the back of a run of shit away results, plus a run of shit home results whilst rock bottom of the table. And with really, really greasy hair.Jugs wrote:I have some sympathy for Bish. If this was Freedman in charge, with his team conceding late goal after late goal, he'd have been lynched.
Lennon is currently conceding late goal after late goal while at least holding a fair run of home results and we're safe. Ok, he's ginger; but no one's perfect.
Re: Wigan, away.
He inherited less than half of the team that started today, but you crack on spouting bollocksLeverEnd wrote:It's not Lennon's fault that the players he inherited are mentally weak.
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Wigan, away.
feck you you miserable c*ntCAPSLOCK wrote:He inherited less than half of the team that started today, but you crack on spouting bollocksLeverEnd wrote:It's not Lennon's fault that the players he inherited are mentally weak.
...
Re: Wigan, away.
Or in other words, 'I was talking shite and the majority of the players have been signed by Lennon'
Crack on
Crack on
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Wigan, away.
The majority of the defence hasn't. And it's an ongoing problem.CAPSLOCK wrote:Or in other words, 'I was talking shite and the majority of the players have been signed by Lennon'
Crack on
But you know what, I may well be wrong, I was just taking part in a civilised discussion about who is to blame for the late goals, my point being that if he's inherited mentally weak players that it's not his fault. If his own players are that way then it obviously is.
But anyway you're not interested in all that. You just pop up every now and then to snipe at people. Evidently not to contribute anything pleasant or constructive.
...
Re: Wigan, away.
Two of today's starting eleven were Freedman signings.
Mind you they're probably bad enough to drag the rest down.
Mind you they're probably bad enough to drag the rest down.
Re: Wigan, away.
Well yes, the point I'm making is that Lennon is not beyond criticism.Enoch wrote:Two of today's starting eleven were Freedman signings.
Mind you they're probably bad enough to drag the rest down.
...
Re: Wigan, away.
Me too, not that I particularly want to critcise the fella.LeverEnd wrote:Well yes, the point I'm making is that Lennon is not beyond criticism.Enoch wrote:Two of today's starting eleven were Freedman signings.
Mind you they're probably bad enough to drag the rest down.
Re: Wigan, away.
Its not me telling folk to fcuk off for simply pointing out what was being posted was shiteLeverEnd wrote:You just pop up every now and then to snipe at people. Evidently not to contribute anything pleasant or constructive.
Sto ut Serviam
Re: Wigan, away.
remember when megson sold nolan for ignoring that ?twilight wrote:Lennon was going absolutely mad on the touchline telling everybody to push forward but the players weren't listening, it seems as if they just freeze.
and its six years or whatever later.
jesus
Re: Wigan, away.
Lennon's approach yesterday made sense mostly when you look at it . Rochinha had a good game midweek and he set out with a team he felt could win against opponents struggling at home . To use rochinha ( and next season clough) in their most effective position does mean 3 5 2 and its a formation we could do with learning to use effectively . Someone mentioned playing one up top with rochinha in the hole but without someone with pratleys mobility getting up to join them that would put too much weight on a lone striker holding the ball .
We needed a big fella to make it stick and an alf to play off him ( alf may not have been 100% but was worth a gamble )
Soon as we go 3 5 2 we need wingbacks who can track back . Vela wasn't fully fit and janko can't be relied on to do the defensive side yet so feeney ( also not 100%) and walker ( could have been moxey) made sense . Walker nicked a goal and did ok.
At the back he understandably stuck with amos although he could have put bogdan in and given himself the option janko on the bench or playing coke ahead of trotter and he kept ream in although dervite may be a better option in a three .
It wasn't a surprise to see bannan start, a midfield of coke and trotter is more suited to long ball . Had vela been fit and coke free to play it may have given us a better balance but once amos was picked that wasn't an option and trotter being on contract needs to be given games. Yes we don't think he's goin to do a pratley but Lennon has to see for himself. Trotter is contracted and a problem over which a decision needs to be made in the summer. Better to make it having given him an opportunity .
We set out to win and didn't take a few early chances after which Wigan took control . Taking off rochinha on the hour and switching to 442 made sense though it didn't change our lightweight central midfield , putting cravies on when he did also made sense . Alf wasn't in the game and we were under pressure . Likewise moxey for a tiring walker a sane defensive switch to try and hold out .
It's worth remembering that alf, feeney and vela may not have been fully fit. In theory lennon's decisions all make sense except possibly the decision to continue with amos which unnecessarily limited our loan options and persisting with ream in a back three but again ream is under contract and if we are going to use a three regularly next year he could do with being able to play in that system .
The late goal thing is what it is . Maybe it's a mental issue but realistically these games where we concede late have also been games where we could easily have conceded earlier as opponents have been in top and missing chances throughout the game .
There's all sorts of things behind the relatively poor performance but we stole a draw in a game we deserved to lose which has to be a plus .
We will have more players fully fit after the break , Mavis may be back and danns will be . The half fit( feeney, alf, vela, janko) should be back at 100%. We are pretty much safe and planning for next season. It's an ideal opportunity for the manager to try things out and make decisions so yes we will see 352 not because he's stubborn and inflexible but because its a system we could do with being able to use as we have talented players who suit playing in the hole and we will probably see players given games to see if they can be useful next season as trotter has been in the last two . It's fair and sensible management .
It was a good result yesterday. We didn't lose away against a much improved Wigan team and lennon continues to learn more about what he has to work with and what he may choose not to work with .
We needed a big fella to make it stick and an alf to play off him ( alf may not have been 100% but was worth a gamble )
Soon as we go 3 5 2 we need wingbacks who can track back . Vela wasn't fully fit and janko can't be relied on to do the defensive side yet so feeney ( also not 100%) and walker ( could have been moxey) made sense . Walker nicked a goal and did ok.
At the back he understandably stuck with amos although he could have put bogdan in and given himself the option janko on the bench or playing coke ahead of trotter and he kept ream in although dervite may be a better option in a three .
It wasn't a surprise to see bannan start, a midfield of coke and trotter is more suited to long ball . Had vela been fit and coke free to play it may have given us a better balance but once amos was picked that wasn't an option and trotter being on contract needs to be given games. Yes we don't think he's goin to do a pratley but Lennon has to see for himself. Trotter is contracted and a problem over which a decision needs to be made in the summer. Better to make it having given him an opportunity .
We set out to win and didn't take a few early chances after which Wigan took control . Taking off rochinha on the hour and switching to 442 made sense though it didn't change our lightweight central midfield , putting cravies on when he did also made sense . Alf wasn't in the game and we were under pressure . Likewise moxey for a tiring walker a sane defensive switch to try and hold out .
It's worth remembering that alf, feeney and vela may not have been fully fit. In theory lennon's decisions all make sense except possibly the decision to continue with amos which unnecessarily limited our loan options and persisting with ream in a back three but again ream is under contract and if we are going to use a three regularly next year he could do with being able to play in that system .
The late goal thing is what it is . Maybe it's a mental issue but realistically these games where we concede late have also been games where we could easily have conceded earlier as opponents have been in top and missing chances throughout the game .
There's all sorts of things behind the relatively poor performance but we stole a draw in a game we deserved to lose which has to be a plus .
We will have more players fully fit after the break , Mavis may be back and danns will be . The half fit( feeney, alf, vela, janko) should be back at 100%. We are pretty much safe and planning for next season. It's an ideal opportunity for the manager to try things out and make decisions so yes we will see 352 not because he's stubborn and inflexible but because its a system we could do with being able to use as we have talented players who suit playing in the hole and we will probably see players given games to see if they can be useful next season as trotter has been in the last two . It's fair and sensible management .
It was a good result yesterday. We didn't lose away against a much improved Wigan team and lennon continues to learn more about what he has to work with and what he may choose not to work with .
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Wigan, away.
Trotter is fecking rubbish....he is absolutely utter dog shite, get rid.
If he is in the side next season we will be in the same position as we are now, its like playing with 10 men he adds nothing, slow, lethargic, disinterested.
Ream, Mills & Feeney can also go for me along with Danns
There is a total lack of character throughout this side
If he is in the side next season we will be in the same position as we are now, its like playing with 10 men he adds nothing, slow, lethargic, disinterested.
Ream, Mills & Feeney can also go for me along with Danns
There is a total lack of character throughout this side
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 96 guests