Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:36 pm

Lovely running in behind there from Coyote. Get in.
May the bridges I burn light your way

Burnden Paddock
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3734
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Bury

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Burnden Paddock » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:36 pm

Amazing what can happen when you actually try to get in behind the opposition full backs!

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:37 pm

Sarcevic gets the ball 30 yards out, inside-right channel. The only player to make a move is Doyle - who drops off and away from the area. No. That's where Crawford, Kioso and Comley should be offering. Get Doyle in the danger zone.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:37 pm


User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 8593
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by DJBlu » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:38 pm

Hahaha

Uncle Hugh Janus gets a shout out on the commentary.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 23999
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Prufrock » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:39 pm

Hahahahaha
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 23999
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Prufrock » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:39 pm

He's exploded :lol:
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36018
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:39 pm

Sarcevic really is struggling here.

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9099
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Harry Genshaw » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:42 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:39 pm
Sarcevic really is struggling here.
Been awful hasn't he? Only the hapless Gordon has been worse.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36018
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:43 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:42 pm
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:39 pm
Sarcevic really is struggling here.
Been awful hasn't he? Only the hapless Gordon has been worse.
Crawford equally as dreadful.

User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 8593
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by DJBlu » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:43 pm

Have Oldham got a player called Jam Butty?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36018
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:44 pm

The Oldham number 24 is what we need upfront. Miles better than Doyle.

User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 8593
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by DJBlu » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:45 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:44 pm
The Oldham number 24 is what we need upfront. Miles better than Doyle.
You did say.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:45 pm

DJBlu wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:43 pm
Have Oldham got a player called Jam Butty?
:mrgreen:

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:46 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:44 pm
The Oldham number 24 is what we need upfront. Miles better than Doyle.
I'm.sure we'd make him look shite as well.
...

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:47 pm

DJBlu wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:43 pm
Have Oldham got a player called Jam Butty?
Sounds like Jam Batty, which sounds painful.
...

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28594
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:48 pm


User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9099
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Harry Genshaw » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:49 pm

Trying to play a possession based game with too many players incapable of keeping possession.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 23999
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by Prufrock » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:49 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:43 pm
Harry Genshaw wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:42 pm
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:39 pm
Sarcevic really is struggling here.
Been awful hasn't he? Only the hapless Gordon has been worse.
Crawford equally as dreadful.
So lacking in confidence. What does Ronan have to do?

New guy looks good. Otherwise we look good in the final third (but not getting there) and ropey af at the back.

The worrying thing is how often we are not on the same page, leaving balls to each other, blind balls with no run made. Hopefully that's part of the patterns of play stuff that will come.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
The_Gun
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3191
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 9:54 am

Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..

Post by The_Gun » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:51 pm

I can't for the life of me understand why you would start Gordon over Mascoll.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 50 guests