Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Lovely running in behind there from Coyote. Get in.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3734
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:14 pm
- Location: Bury
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Amazing what can happen when you actually try to get in behind the opposition full backs!
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Sarcevic gets the ball 30 yards out, inside-right channel. The only player to make a move is Doyle - who drops off and away from the area. No. That's where Crawford, Kioso and Comley should be offering. Get Doyle in the danger zone.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Hahaha
Uncle Hugh Janus gets a shout out on the commentary.
Uncle Hugh Janus gets a shout out on the commentary.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Hahahahaha
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
He's exploded
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36080
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Sarcevic really is struggling here.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Been awful hasn't he? Only the hapless Gordon has been worse.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36080
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Crawford equally as dreadful.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:42 pmBeen awful hasn't he? Only the hapless Gordon has been worse.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Have Oldham got a player called Jam Butty?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36080
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
The Oldham number 24 is what we need upfront. Miles better than Doyle.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
You did say.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:44 pmThe Oldham number 24 is what we need upfront. Miles better than Doyle.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
I'm.sure we'd make him look shite as well.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:44 pmThe Oldham number 24 is what we need upfront. Miles better than Doyle.
...
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
Trying to play a possession based game with too many players incapable of keeping possession.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
So lacking in confidence. What does Ronan have to do?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:43 pmCrawford equally as dreadful.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:42 pmBeen awful hasn't he? Only the hapless Gordon has been worse.
New guy looks good. Otherwise we look good in the final third (but not getting there) and ropey af at the back.
The worrying thing is how often we are not on the same page, leaving balls to each other, blind balls with no run made. Hopefully that's part of the patterns of play stuff that will come.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: Oldham or fold em, but no full house in sight..
I can't for the life of me understand why you would start Gordon over Mascoll.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 236 guests