Stats
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Stats
DSB - in yer stats mine, does it list assists by player? Only, it occurred to me this morning that of our meagre 18 goals scored, Trafford's supplied the assist for (I think) two of 'em.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
I've just looked this up and I am genuinely surprised by the top assister this season. Might give y'all a wee while to guess.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 3:06 pmDSB - in yer stats mine, does it list assists by player? Only, it occurred to me this morning that of our meagre 18 goals scored, Trafford's supplied the assist for (I think) two of 'em.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32450
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Stats
Yeah it comes down to how you view the game I suppose. Watching a 20 pass move that results in us hitting the corner flag doesn't impress me much.
Last night, from whoscored @ 66 minutes (first subs) we had 4 shots, 3 off target, 1 blocked. @ 74 minutes (cavalry subs) we were still the same stat - and indeed all the way through to minute 81.
In the remainder of the game, we managed
12 shots, 6 on target, 4 blocked and 2 off target.
We didn't manage that last block playing purty nice ball football. I'd like to see more of the latter please.
Edit: Apols DSB
Last night, from whoscored @ 66 minutes (first subs) we had 4 shots, 3 off target, 1 blocked. @ 74 minutes (cavalry subs) we were still the same stat - and indeed all the way through to minute 81.
In the remainder of the game, we managed
12 shots, 6 on target, 4 blocked and 2 off target.
We didn't manage that last block playing purty nice ball football. I'd like to see more of the latter please.
Edit: Apols DSB
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
What for? No need to apologise...
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Stats
I'd have thought it'd be Afolayan, but I guess from your surprise it isn't. Iredale, maybe?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 3:09 pmI've just looked this up and I am genuinely surprised by the top assister this season. Might give y'all a wee while to guess.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 3:06 pmDSB - in yer stats mine, does it list assists by player? Only, it occurred to me this morning that of our meagre 18 goals scored, Trafford's supplied the assist for (I think) two of 'em.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Stats
Iredale would've been my guess, but my surprise would be the other way around to Brucie's given how long Dapo has been splinter gathering.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32450
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Stats
I posted the answer, pre-edit
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
OIC! Well, I'm off out for the evening now, so I'm pasting the answer - or answers, league-only and all-comps - below in white, in case anyone wants to play.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 6:16 pmI posted the answer, pre-edit
Assists, all comps
Kachunga 5
Iredale 4
Lee 3
Bradley 3
Johnston 2
Afolayan 2
Bakayoko 2
Bodvarsson 2
Jones 1
Aimson 1
Trafford 1
Thomason 1
Isgrove 1
Assists, league only
Bradley 3
Kachunga 2
Afolayan 2
Iredale 2
Jones 1
Johnston 1
Trafford 1
Bakayoko 1
Bodvarsson 1
Thomason 1
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
Evatt: “People get on at us about set plays, but we’ve got back in the game on Saturday with a set play and we’ve scored the winner (on Tuesday) from a set play, so we’re working hard to try and fix this.
“Some of it has worked, some of it hasn’t, but it’s another string to our bow that we’re working very hard to be added to our game.”
“Some of it has worked, some of it hasn’t, but it’s another string to our bow that we’re working very hard to be added to our game.”
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
Just noticed something interesting and counterintuitive.
According to Opta's L1 analysis, we have the division's fifth-highest "direct speed" - defined as "a measure of how quickly a team progresses the ball upfield (metres/second)". The only four teams who attack faster are Burton, Accy, Wycombe and Vale.
Last season, by contrast, we were the fifth-slowest (among those slower were MK Dons and Wigan).
Make of that what you will.
According to Opta's L1 analysis, we have the division's fifth-highest "direct speed" - defined as "a measure of how quickly a team progresses the ball upfield (metres/second)". The only four teams who attack faster are Burton, Accy, Wycombe and Vale.
Last season, by contrast, we were the fifth-slowest (among those slower were MK Dons and Wigan).
Make of that what you will.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43264
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Stats
Trafford, Kachunga, Net...must be in there..Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 1:58 pmJust noticed something interesting and counterintuitive.
According to Opta's L1 analysis, we have the division's fifth-highest "direct speed" - defined as "a measure of how quickly a team progresses the ball upfield (metres/second)". The only four teams who attack faster are Burton, Accy, Wycombe and Vale.
Last season, by contrast, we were the fifth-slowest (among those slower were MK Dons and Wigan).
Make of that what you will.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
Ha! Baka not Kacha - but yeah.TANGODANCER wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 3:07 pmTrafford, Kachunga, Net...must be in there..Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 1:58 pmJust noticed something interesting and counterintuitive.
According to Opta's L1 analysis, we have the division's fifth-highest "direct speed" - defined as "a measure of how quickly a team progresses the ball upfield (metres/second)". The only four teams who attack faster are Burton, Accy, Wycombe and Vale.
Last season, by contrast, we were the fifth-slowest (among those slower were MK Dons and Wigan).
Make of that what you will.
15 games in though, the odd late GET IT IN THE MIXER Hail-Mary shouldn't make too much difference. As I say, it's counterintuitive - like many others, I sigh or worse when we go sideways - but we are measurably going forward faster than last season.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32450
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Stats
Do we have to?Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 1:58 pmJust noticed something interesting and counterintuitive.
According to Opta's L1 analysis, we have the division's fifth-highest "direct speed" - defined as "a measure of how quickly a team progresses the ball upfield (metres/second)". The only four teams who attack faster are Burton, Accy, Wycombe and Vale.
Last season, by contrast, we were the fifth-slowest (among those slower were MK Dons and Wigan).
Make of that what you will.
I'm not sure it tells us much, on the grounds that a sequence could end anywhere on the field. So we could be the quickest team in the world to go from Traff to Santos and that's 90% of our sequences, and the slowest at going from somewhere near the HW line to the box!
There's some stats for you to play with here:
https://theanalyst.com/eu/2022/08/leagu ... s-2022-23/
If you didn't know about it mate
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
Not sure that makes any sense at all, practically. Unless Santos is losing the ball on each of those 90%. Which wouldn't lead to us being the playoffs...Worthy4England wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 4:21 pmI'm not sure it tells us much, on the grounds that a sequence could end anywhere on the field. So we could be the quickest team in the world to go from Traff to Santos and that's 90% of our sequences, and the slowest at going from somewhere near the HW line to the box!
Also, why the difference to last season?
That's where I got it from - taWorthy4England wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 4:21 pmThere's some stats for you to play with here:
https://theanalyst.com/eu/2022/08/leagu ... s-2022-23/
If you didn't know about it mate
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32450
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Stats
Well the 90% from Trafford to Santos, is self-evidently at one of the poles of the argument, aye. But even if it was Traff to Charles, it's no sort of indication of useful, being the quickest team in the division to lose it on the edge of the oppos box doesn't help much either. Which is what we used to do under Allardyce when Davo didn't win the header, but boy were we good at picking up the second phase, which would in this parlance be a second "sequence"
I think if they isolated sequences to speed in relation to a sequence that ended up as a shot (preferably on target), then it would make a much more meaningful measure...City for example are in the bottom right of slow and intricate. The speed they managed to achieve from their keeper isn't really relevant and they're absolutely capable of lightning quick counters.
So I'm still not sure of its value...
I think if they isolated sequences to speed in relation to a sequence that ended up as a shot (preferably on target), then it would make a much more meaningful measure...City for example are in the bottom right of slow and intricate. The speed they managed to achieve from their keeper isn't really relevant and they're absolutely capable of lightning quick counters.
So I'm still not sure of its value...
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28687
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Stats
Indeed not - as would be suggested by the league positions of the four 'quicker' teams than us (Burton 23rd, Accy 19th, Wycombe 13th, Vale 15th). But people still seems to want us to get it forward more quickly.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 4:49 pmWell the 90% from Trafford to Santos, is self-evidently at one of the poles of the argument, aye. But even if it was Traff to Charles, it's no sort of indication of useful, being the quickest team in the division to lose it on the edge of the oppos box doesn't help much either.
This may be of interest:Worthy4England wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2022 4:49 pmI think if they isolated sequences to speed in relation to a sequence that ended up as a shot (preferably on target), then it would make a much more meaningful measure...
.
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2022-10-27 at 17.55.22.png (38.96 KiB) Viewed 5391 times
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32450
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Stats
Yeah, I think I like that stat better other than it's a "shot or touch" in the oppos box...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests