9/11 Conspiracy Theory - Very interesting stuff
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Just found this game for those interested in conspiracy.
Remember to send me a post card when you collect your winnings!
http://www.theconspiracygame.co.uk/conspiracy/
Remember to send me a post card when you collect your winnings!
http://www.theconspiracygame.co.uk/conspiracy/
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Didnt know that. What was heard on the recordings? Has it been made public? There is a school of thought that flight 93 was shot down by the USAF.Montreal Wanderer wrote:They recovered both boxes from Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania, Harry.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Only transcripts have been released to the public which show the hijackers decided to crash the plane during the passenger rebellion. Of course, since it is only a transcript, who'd believe it? The plane flying nearby (relatively) was a corporate jet not a military plane. On the blackbox (they are orange) recovery see thisHarry Genshaw wrote:Didnt know that. What was heard on the recordings? Has it been made public? There is a school of thought that flight 93 was shot down by the USAF.Montreal Wanderer wrote:They recovered both boxes from Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania, Harry.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Mmm Interesting stuff Monty. There seems to be quite a bit of contradictory info on there though. Did the passengers get into the cockpit and bring the plane down or not? One official scource said no, t'other says they did. Same for whether the pilot was murdered or not.
I read only last night that some parties refute that there were any successful calls made from the flight because mobiles aren't operative above 8000 feet. I dont know how high flight 93 was flying but surely all the bereaved families who claimed to have received calls werent lying?
Whatever the circumstances - may the victims rest in peace.
I read only last night that some parties refute that there were any successful calls made from the flight because mobiles aren't operative above 8000 feet. I dont know how high flight 93 was flying but surely all the bereaved families who claimed to have received calls werent lying?
Whatever the circumstances - may the victims rest in peace.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Amen.Harry Genshaw wrote:Mmm Interesting stuff Monty. There seems to be quite a bit of contradictory info on there though. Did the passengers get into the cockpit and bring the plane down or not? One official scource said no, t'other says they did. Same for whether the pilot was murdered or not.
I read only last night that some parties refute that there were any successful calls made from the flight because mobiles aren't operative above 8000 feet. I dont know how high flight 93 was flying but surely all the bereaved families who claimed to have received calls werent lying?
Whatever the circumstances - may the victims rest in peace.
The Popular Mechanics article Lennon posted was pretty convincing to me and covered most of the aspects that conspiracy theorists bring up.[/url]
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
I asked Michael Portillo, someone I have a lot of respect for, about the 9/11 conspiracy theories last Friday and he was quite clear that they are all nonsense.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
That's what i've been saying for a week and you didn't believe me? Who's this Portillo chap anyway?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I asked Michael Portillo, someone I have a lot of respect for, about the 9/11 conspiracy theories last Friday and he was quite clear that they are all nonsense.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
No, I didn't say that. But it was interesting for me to hear how unequivocal he was - he is always very good on international affairs.Batman wrote:Oh right, there you go then. Must be tripe if Portillo says so.
Last edited by mummywhycantieatcrayons on Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:16 pm
- Location: Nearer to Ewood Park than I like
Failed politicianMontreal Wanderer wrote:That's what i've been saying for a week and you didn't believe me? Who's this Portillo chap anyway?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I asked Michael Portillo, someone I have a lot of respect for, about the 9/11 conspiracy theories last Friday and he was quite clear that they are all nonsense.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
He was a politician, gave it up when the numpties in the Conservative Party chose Iain Duncan-Smith over him, and is now a respected journalist.warthog wrote:Failed politicianMontreal Wanderer wrote:That's what i've been saying for a week and you didn't believe me? Who's this Portillo chap anyway?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I asked Michael Portillo, someone I have a lot of respect for, about the 9/11 conspiracy theories last Friday and he was quite clear that they are all nonsense.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Well, he's a Conservative who began his career under Thatcher, so what do you expect?Montreal Wanderer wrote:Interestingly differing views of Portillo.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Ahh, but have you typed out what he said into Wingdings. Now there's your acid test, sonny Jim.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I asked Michael Portillo, someone I have a lot of respect for, about the 9/11 conspiracy theories last Friday and he was quite clear that they are all nonsense.
May the bridges I burn light your way
My first foray into this thread, and admittedly it's an old post but I'd like to question this somewhat. Yes the hijackers (some of them) had attended aviation schools, but unless they were contracted employees of a major airline there's no way that they would be allowed into the cockpit, and certainly not just on the grounds that they had a pilots license that allowed them to fly nowt bigger than a Cesena. I don't recall seeing any evidence that the hijackers worked for the airlines, and doubt highly that they would have been allowed the jump seat.Bruce Rioja wrote:OK, I'll tell you. In the cockpit of all American planes there is a spare seat, this seat is known as the Jump Seat. The reason for the spare seat is that an American Aviation Official can, and will, turn up without any prior warning whatsoever to asses the Pilots.
Now then, American Pilots get free air travel when they're not working or when they've dropped a plane off somewhere or whatever. Usually Pilots are offered accomodation in First Class if available, but it is more common for them to ask for the Jump Seat so that they've got someone to talk to.
Bearing in mind that the Hi-jackers were also qualified Pilots, they too asked for the jump seats, then, when in place and the planes were airborne they cut the throats of the original Pilots.
And no, I'm not doubting the jump seat and its existence, after all we've all seen 'Catch Me If You Can'.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Question it all you want, Blurred. That account was given to me first hand by pilots of American Airlines that I was sat chatting to in London a couple of years ago. Apparently it is extremely common for pilots of all airlines to hitch a ride in the jump seat. Their account, not mine. (Oh, and I've never even heard of Catch Me If You Can, what is it? a film? )blurred wrote:My first foray into this thread, and admittedly it's an old post but I'd like to question this somewhat. Yes the hijackers (some of them) had attended aviation schools, but unless they were contracted employees of a major airline there's no way that they would be allowed into the cockpit, and certainly not just on the grounds that they had a pilots license that allowed them to fly nowt bigger than a Cesena. I don't recall seeing any evidence that the hijackers worked for the airlines, and doubt highly that they would have been allowed the jump seat.Bruce Rioja wrote:OK, I'll tell you. In the cockpit of all American planes there is a spare seat, this seat is known as the Jump Seat. The reason for the spare seat is that an American Aviation Official can, and will, turn up without any prior warning whatsoever to asses the Pilots.
Now then, American Pilots get free air travel when they're not working or when they've dropped a plane off somewhere or whatever. Usually Pilots are offered accomodation in First Class if available, but it is more common for them to ask for the Jump Seat so that they've got someone to talk to.
Bearing in mind that the Hi-jackers were also qualified Pilots, they too asked for the jump seats, then, when in place and the planes were airborne they cut the throats of the original Pilots.
And no, I'm not doubting the jump seat and its existence, after all we've all seen 'Catch Me If You Can'.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Read what I said again. I'm not saying it's uncommon, I'm saying that none of the hijackers worked for any airlines. They had rudimentary flying skills (almost certainly none of them with jets the size of the passenger flights they were on) and therefore would not have been given the jump seat.Bruce Rioja wrote:Question it all you want, Blurred. That account was given to me first hand by pilots of American Airlines that I was sat chatting to in London a couple of years ago. Apparently it is extremely common for pilots of all airlines to hitch a ride in the jump seat. Their account, not mine.
Unless anyone can point me to evidence that John Q Terrorist (can't be arsed researching the names of all the hijackers, but whoever supposedly did the flying out of the 19 or so gentlemen concerned) was a salaried pilot with any reputable airline, then this theory to me is complete bunkum.
As I said, I know the jump seat exists, and know how and when it's used, but it would not have been in this instance, unless John Q Terrorist was a pilot for Continental/Virgin/NorthWest/AA/whoever. Which he wasn't.
A quick google search finds an interesting article about this jumpseat thing:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1643665/posts
(And I suppose this answers the above post.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1643665/posts
(And I suppose this answers the above post.)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests