he's went and quite literally posted..
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
he's went and quite literally posted..
To be honest with you, here's an occasional thread for any saddo like me who at this moment in time is increasingly irritated by pundit-talk... This embraces a wide variety of aberrations including:
1. Use of special pundit tenses. "He's went straight past the defender."
2. preposterous use of the word "literally" (and "ironic")
3. over-excessive use of "fillers" and cliches - "at this moment in time" / "to be honest with you"
4. sheer stupidness - "they've got to come out and give 200%"
5. other pundit-mangling that I've forgotten about
(not a colemanballs thread)
I'm so sad that I shout at the radio when I hear it - BUT - it's not quite as easy to do as it sounds.. I can't do it off the cuff as they do - maybe I should give them more respect, because mangling the English language is not as easy as it sounds!
so..
this thread is for anyone who wants to report such abuses that they have heard - or more importantly - for those who want to practise their own pundit-talk ready for the day when that call comes from the BBC or from SkySpurts
I'm inviting you to describe any topic of general interest re. BWFC - only you have to do it in pundit stylee... (it's not as easy as you think!)
I may even select a "star post" every now and again! (just a bit of fun....)
(PS - in case there are any pundits reading (Alan Green??), I do know it is harder to speak proper when it's live and you simply have to talk unprompted when the microphone is shoved at you, but..... there are limits!!)
1. Use of special pundit tenses. "He's went straight past the defender."
2. preposterous use of the word "literally" (and "ironic")
3. over-excessive use of "fillers" and cliches - "at this moment in time" / "to be honest with you"
4. sheer stupidness - "they've got to come out and give 200%"
5. other pundit-mangling that I've forgotten about
(not a colemanballs thread)
I'm so sad that I shout at the radio when I hear it - BUT - it's not quite as easy to do as it sounds.. I can't do it off the cuff as they do - maybe I should give them more respect, because mangling the English language is not as easy as it sounds!
so..
this thread is for anyone who wants to report such abuses that they have heard - or more importantly - for those who want to practise their own pundit-talk ready for the day when that call comes from the BBC or from SkySpurts
I'm inviting you to describe any topic of general interest re. BWFC - only you have to do it in pundit stylee... (it's not as easy as you think!)
I may even select a "star post" every now and again! (just a bit of fun....)
(PS - in case there are any pundits reading (Alan Green??), I do know it is harder to speak proper when it's live and you simply have to talk unprompted when the microphone is shoved at you, but..... there are limits!!)
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:09 am
- Location: Enfield.....Duh!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
The team are ....
No the team IS......
come on now, gents.
"The boys done good"
"he scores goals for fun" - no it's his fecking job!!!!
"that's an almighty crack he's given it" - he's God is he?
"There's no time left" - you mean apart from those minutes remaining?
No the team IS......
come on now, gents.
"The boys done good"
"he scores goals for fun" - no it's his fecking job!!!!
"that's an almighty crack he's given it" - he's God is he?
"There's no time left" - you mean apart from those minutes remaining?
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14096
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Use of the word "obviously" by Lucozade swigging (at £70 per shot-to-camera) players, after a game.
I reckon that we could have a little game here of -who says "Obviously" the most in a single interview?
I'd have to say that our very own SKD is worth a fiver each way.
I reckon that we could have a little game here of -who says "Obviously" the most in a single interview?
I'd have to say that our very own SKD is worth a fiver each way.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
Not so much pundits - but post-match interviewers (but has spread like a particularly virulent rash across the whole of radio...)
bonkers use of the words "yourself, myself" when the right word is simply "you" or "me"
eg.. "Davo's flicked it over to myself and I've just hit it, and it's went in." (multiple points for that one!)
and I heard a cricket interviewer asking about selection for the ashes tour:
"When did Duncan Fletcher phone yourself to tell you that you were going to Australia?"
Aaaaaaaaaaagghh!!!!"
(similarly (though not so often in football commentary!) the word "criminality" now having totally replaced the word "crime" - why??)
bonkers use of the words "yourself, myself" when the right word is simply "you" or "me"
eg.. "Davo's flicked it over to myself and I've just hit it, and it's went in." (multiple points for that one!)
and I heard a cricket interviewer asking about selection for the ashes tour:
"When did Duncan Fletcher phone yourself to tell you that you were going to Australia?"
Aaaaaaaaaaagghh!!!!"
(similarly (though not so often in football commentary!) the word "criminality" now having totally replaced the word "crime" - why??)
whats wrong with that?thebish wrote:in the 5-live-xtra commentary today (which was seven shades of shite!)
Girl-commentator: What was that freekick for?
stupid man pundit: The ref's give it for a push on the bolton goalie.
the "the ref's give" part ? when youre thinking its 'gave' ?
- 's is a contraction , so -unsquashed- it wouldve been the " ref has give it " - which is right ..
if it was- "the ref has gave it " , it would've been hella wrong..
"the ref gave it " wouldve bin right tho...
....
you made the same mistake with the "the crowd's woke up" one , as well ... either that or youre thinking 's means 2 and are thinking "how the christ can there be 2 crowds at a football match?"
and again with the everton chelsea one....
it's means it has ...
this thread is a nitpickers Achilles Heel ...
whats wrong with that?
the "the ref's give" part ? when youre thinking its 'gave' ?
- 's is a contraction , so -unsquashed- it wouldve been the " ref has give it " - which is right ..
if it was- "the ref has gave it " , it woudlve been hella wrong..
"the ref gave it " wouldve bin right tho...
you made the same mistake with the "the crowd's woke up" one , as well ... either that or youre thinking 's means 2 and are thinking "how the christ can there be 2 crowds at a football match?"
and again with the everton chelsea one....
it's means it has ...
this thread is a nitpickers Achilles Heel ...[/quote]
errr... no!!
"The ref has give it" is NOT right.. "The ref has given it" would be...
neither is "the crowd has woke up" correct - "the crowd has woken up" would be...
which school did you go to? re you o drugs??
Phil
the "the ref's give" part ? when youre thinking its 'gave' ?
- 's is a contraction , so -unsquashed- it wouldve been the " ref has give it " - which is right ..
if it was- "the ref has gave it " , it woudlve been hella wrong..
"the ref gave it " wouldve bin right tho...
you made the same mistake with the "the crowd's woke up" one , as well ... either that or youre thinking 's means 2 and are thinking "how the christ can there be 2 crowds at a football match?"
and again with the everton chelsea one....
it's means it has ...
this thread is a nitpickers Achilles Heel ...[/quote]
errr... no!!
"The ref has give it" is NOT right.. "The ref has given it" would be...
neither is "the crowd has woke up" correct - "the crowd has woken up" would be...
which school did you go to? re you o drugs??
Phil
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Yes, the commentator said we would be playing them the last game of the season at JJB. I thought that was a bit odd - but I forgave him since he said the referee was a little harsh on us regarding some of the "infractions".americantrotter wrote:The commantator today mentioned that we drew Aston Villa in the reverse fixture last year.....at the JJB
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
a1 wrote:whats wrong with that?thebish wrote:in the 5-live-xtra commentary today (which was seven shades of shite!)
Girl-commentator: What was that freekick for?
stupid man pundit: The ref's give it for a push on the bolton goalie.
the "the ref's give" part ? when youre thinking its 'gave' ?
- 's is a contraction , so -unsquashed- it wouldve been the " ref has give it " - which is right ..
if it was- "the ref has gave it " , it would've been hella wrong..
"the ref gave it " wouldve bin right tho...
....
you made the same mistake with the "the crowd's woke up" one , as well ... either that or youre thinking 's means 2 and are thinking "how the christ can there be 2 crowds at a football match?"
and again with the everton chelsea one....
it's means it has ...
this thread is a nitpickers Achilles Heel ...
You're taking the piss, right?
May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests