The end of 'Playing for a Point' ???
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
The end of 'Playing for a Point' ???
What utter, utter bollocks
League considers scrapping draws
Football League chairmen meet on Thursday
The Football League board is to consider a proposal to scrap draws and decide matches by penalty shoot-outs, BBC Five Live understands.
The idea will be discussed by Football League chairmen and chief executives at a board meeting on Thursday.
No timescale has been given for implementing the change if the chairmen go ahead with the proposal.
"Why can't we just have a draw?" Bournemouth boss Kevin Bond told the Daily Echo newspaper.
The idea was originally put forward in the recent Football League Fans Survey.
There are currently two proposals to be considered - a traditional penalty shoot-out or where a player would have eight seconds to try and score after receiving the ball on the half-way line.
"I don't agree with it because I think it's too much of a radical change," Bond added.
"I'm very open-minded and I think certain laws of the game need to move with the times but that would be too much of a drastic measure."
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43326
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Lunacy spawns lunacy. You play well, get a hard-earned draw away from home and then get nothing by losing a penalty shoot out. Who the fxxk comes up with these ideas? And why is this generation breaking its neck to change every form of tradition? What's with this "knock all the statues down and replace them with yellow bananas and unmade beds" brigade? Is there a prize somewhere for re-writing the book? Football has managed for years to survive by playing the rules of the game. We need these sort of changes as much as we need the cranks who invent them. Leave the game alone, get rid of the idiots instead.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7042
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: HULL, BABY!
- Contact:
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
-
- Henrik
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:16 pm
- Location: Wiggin (help!)
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
Or quite the opposite - side's'd be happy to sit on a 0-0 in the knowledge that all they would need is 5 decent penalty takers to get 3 points. If anything it could make football even duller.hisroyalgingerness wrote:sam would be fecked
be tempted to scrap 0-0s from an entertainment perspective
clubs would basically have to score to take anything from a game and at least supporters would see some sort of action
Absolute arse-gravy of the highest order. Whoever's pushing this should be shot.
yep, it would make the actual game more prone to draws, just look at the likes of world cup games when they get to knockout stageblurred wrote:Or quite the opposite - side's'd be happy to sit on a 0-0 in the knowledge that all they would need is 5 decent penalty takers to get 3 points. If anything it could make football even duller.hisroyalgingerness wrote:sam would be fecked
be tempted to scrap 0-0s from an entertainment perspective
clubs would basically have to score to take anything from a game and at least supporters would see some sort of action
Absolute arse-gravy of the highest order. Whoever's pushing this should be shot.
lets let the americans stick to a no draws principle and we'll keep the game of football the way it is
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
I heard that if you win in this way you get 2 points, the "loser" still gets the point for the draw.blurred wrote:Or quite the opposite - side's'd be happy to sit on a 0-0 in the knowledge that all they would need is 5 decent penalty takers to get 3 points. If anything it could make football even duller.hisroyalgingerness wrote:sam would be fecked
be tempted to scrap 0-0s from an entertainment perspective
clubs would basically have to score to take anything from a game and at least supporters would see some sort of action
Absolute arse-gravy of the highest order. Whoever's pushing this should be shot.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Or, score within the first 5 minutes then revert back to the 'play for a draw' style only with a goal in the bag.hisroyalgingerness wrote:sam would be fecked
be tempted to scrap 0-0s from an entertainment perspective
clubs would basically have to score to take anything from a game and at least supporters would see some sort of action
I say leave the game alone. After all this is only being talked about because Americans find it so difficult to understand that a sport can be played without there being a definite winner.
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
which is even bigger arse-gravy.superjohnmcginlay wrote:I heard that if you win in this way you get 2 points, the "loser" still gets the point for the draw.blurred wrote:Or quite the opposite - side's'd be happy to sit on a 0-0 in the knowledge that all they would need is 5 decent penalty takers to get 3 points. If anything it could make football even duller.hisroyalgingerness wrote:sam would be fecked
be tempted to scrap 0-0s from an entertainment perspective
clubs would basically have to score to take anything from a game and at least supporters would see some sort of action
Absolute arse-gravy of the highest order. Whoever's pushing this should be shot.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43326
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
In hockey, which now has no draws, you get two points for a win and one for an overtime or shoot-out loss. Except the championship series where they play overtime until there is a 'sudden death' winner. The system makes it quite hard to calculate what you need to do to make the playoffs, etc. although I personally enjoy the shootouts. This scoring system is fairly new to make hockey more exciting after the one-year lockout. They are thinking of three points for a win in regulation time a la football.communistworkethic wrote:which is even bigger arse-gravy.superjohnmcginlay wrote:I heard that if you win in this way you get 2 points, the "loser" still gets the point for the draw.blurred wrote:Or quite the opposite - side's'd be happy to sit on a 0-0 in the knowledge that all they would need is 5 decent penalty takers to get 3 points. If anything it could make football even duller.hisroyalgingerness wrote:sam would be fecked
be tempted to scrap 0-0s from an entertainment perspective
clubs would basically have to score to take anything from a game and at least supporters would see some sort of action
Absolute arse-gravy of the highest order. Whoever's pushing this should be shot.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 70 guests