The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
You've got a natural feel for it mate - keep going. It would be interesting to see what you could do if you graduated to oil-based paints.TANGODANCER wrote:No, never Mummy. I could always draw at school and art was a favourite subject. Haven't painted anything for years. I have been looking at the painting lessons available on youtube lately which are a good guide.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Have you had tuition, Tango?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Now there's a thing Mummy. I had an oil-painting set bought for me as a kid but just didn't take to it. Always preferred a box of water colours and have no inclination for oils. I'm not thinking of making a career of it at my age anyway. It's just a hobby I've re-discoveredmummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:You've got a natural feel for it mate - keep going. It would be interesting to see what you could do if you graduated to oil-based paints.TANGODANCER wrote:No, never Mummy. I could always draw at school and art was a favourite subject. Haven't painted anything for years. I have been looking at the painting lessons available on youtube lately which are a good guide.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Have you had tuition, Tango?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
For those interested in thinking about art... the fabulous Grayson Perry is doing the BBC Reith Lectures this year - starts tomorrow - is bound to be interesting and entertaining!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00729d9
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00729d9
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: The Great Art Debate
That's brilliant Tango! You're very talented. I can't even draw stick people well.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 8:55 pm
- Location: Worryingly close to Old Tr*fford.
- Contact:
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
In my humble opinion, I think you should refrain for adding things 'for interest's sake', unless as a 'narrative device', if you'll forgive a bit of art speak.... both times you have used that phrase in this thread you have diminished the picture with the associated modification, to my eyes.TANGODANCER wrote:Added a figure or two to my pic for interest sake. Finished now.
Last edited by mummywhycantieatcrayons on Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Thanks for the heads up.thebish wrote:For those interested in thinking about art... the fabulous Grayson Perry is doing the BBC Reith Lectures this year - starts tomorrow - is bound to be interesting and entertaining!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00729d9
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Not sure I understand that Mummy? You don't think putting things in a painting as focal points/ points of interest should be done? The comments were only for here, since no one is likeley to see the paintings except casually, ie family etc. I do admit you have to resist the temptation to add too much, but the figures were just to stop it being too bland.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:In my humble opinion, I think you should refrain for adding things 'for interest's sake', unless as a 'narrative device', if you'll forgive a bit of art speak.... both times you have used that phrase in this thread you have diminished the picture with the associated modification, to my eyes.TANGODANCER wrote:Added a figure or two to my pic for interest sake. Finished now.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's short of a Vulcan Bomber is that painting, Tango. Sort it out.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I'd have thought you'd be the last to want all that tranquility spoiled by Vulcan bombers Bruce.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's short of a Vulcan Bomber is that painting, Tango. Sort it out.
Never been there but it reminds me greatly of a place I have, Stonehaven near Aberdeen. A lovely spot.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I can see why you'd make that connection, Tango, but Stonehaven is something of a sprawling metropolis by comparison.TANGODANCER wrote:I'd have thought you'd be the last to want all that tranquility spoiled by Vulcan bombers Bruce.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's short of a Vulcan Bomber is that painting, Tango. Sort it out.
Never been there but it reminds me greatly of a place I have, Stonehaven near Aberdeen. A lovely spot.
Sadly, whenever I think of Stonehaven I end up thinking about all the speed cameras along the A90.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Aye, it must be twenty years plus since I was up there. I went to the gas and oil exhibition in Aberdeen for a week and rented a cottage nearby. Took the wife and lad and we went out to Stonehaven a couple of times. Probably grown some since then.Bruce Rioja wrote:I can see why you'd make that connection, Tango, but Stonehaven is something of a sprawling metropolis by comparison.TANGODANCER wrote:I'd have thought you'd be the last to want all that tranquility spoiled by Vulcan bombers Bruce.Bruce Rioja wrote:It's short of a Vulcan Bomber is that painting, Tango. Sort it out.
Never been there but it reminds me greatly of a place I have, Stonehaven near Aberdeen. A lovely spot.
Sadly, whenever I think of Stonehaven I end up thinking about all the speed cameras along the A90.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
If extra figures or fog lights add something to the story of the picture than I would say they are good additions, but sometimes simplicity makes a composition more satisfying to look at for reasons that are hard to articulate. Sometimes 'less is more', as they say. I actually didn't find the lone pub bland at all.TANGODANCER wrote:Not sure I understand that Mummy? You don't think putting things in a painting as focal points/ points of interest should be done? The comments were only for here, since no one is likeley to see the paintings except casually, ie family etc. I do admit you have to resist the temptation to add too much, but the figures were just to stop it being too bland.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:In my humble opinion, I think you should refrain for adding things 'for interest's sake', unless as a 'narrative device', if you'll forgive a bit of art speak.... both times you have used that phrase in this thread you have diminished the picture with the associated modification, to my eyes.TANGODANCER wrote:Added a figure or two to my pic for interest sake. Finished now.
I'm all in favour of a genuine focal point, but perhaps not decoration added as an afterthought.
Just a view, anyway - you might find that others disagree or, more importantly, that you just enjoy painting the details regardless.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Still can't like the subject, but you did a grand job with the painting. You've got the skill, go for whatever you feel like as a subject.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent
Re: The Great Art Debate
Yup, was going to do the boy next or the girl from the US version but can't find the right pic
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43337
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Try Google Images. Bound to be there.Raven wrote:Yup, was going to do the boy next or the girl from the US version but can't find the right pic
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests