What are you watching tonight?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: What are you watching tonight?
benn wrote:[At no point was it 'explained' why, having created us, they now wanted to destroy us.]Lost Leopard Spot wrote:benn wrote:really? i thought it was an intriguing insight into the origin of the fossilised alien found in the ship in the first alien film. in finding those and the monster aliens did you expect them creatures to have suddenly become civilised and passed the chewing gum around?Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Was lent the DVD of 'Prometheus'. Cutting edge Sci-fi it is not. I loved Alien and Blade Runner but Prometheus is not worth the pixels it takes up on my screen: same old same old, right down to the android having his head ripped off and continuing to talk; even a pastiche of the alien erupting from the stomach only this time under do-it-yourself surgery.
Yes next film but what is wrong with that?
[Nor was it adequately explained why it was that the weapon they were going to use to destroy us actually destroyed them.]
Erm I thought it was clear that they set up a base on that planet to breed the creatures and it was not their home planet(s) So they were not actually destroyed, some of the creatures actually escaped and they were more or less wiped out
Beats bloody silly Star Wars by a mile but I suppose each to their own
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: What are you watching tonight?
You've got to ignore me... I'm just lashing out - I've had the plague for a week, I've got terminal ennui, and GtE is baiting me with sounds from the Quo. I agree Prometheus pisses on bloody silly Star Wars, but only just. Like Alien, some of the science is a little iffy too, for example in cryogenic sleep for two years to get to a star system with at least five suns! no way, there isn't a five sun system within 100 light years, never mind two (and that's assuming they travelled at the speed of light).benn wrote:[At no point was it 'explained' why, having created us, they now wanted to destroy us.]Lost Leopard Spot wrote:benn wrote:really? i thought it was an intriguing insight into the origin of the fossilised alien found in the ship in the first alien film. in finding those and the monster aliens did you expect them creatures to have suddenly become civilised and passed the chewing gum around?Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Was lent the DVD of 'Prometheus'. Cutting edge Sci-fi it is not. I loved Alien and Blade Runner but Prometheus is not worth the pixels it takes up on my screen: same old same old, right down to the android having his head ripped off and continuing to talk; even a pastiche of the alien erupting from the stomach only this time under do-it-yourself surgery.
Yes next film but what is wrong with that?
[Nor was it adequately explained why it was that the weapon they were going to use to destroy us actually destroyed them.]
Erm I thought it was clear that they set up a base on that planet to breed the creatures and it was not their home planet(s) So they were not actually destroyed, some of the creatures actually escaped and they were more or less wiped out
Beats bloody silly Star Wars by a mile but I suppose each to their own
But that's not what I'm moaning about. My major moan is the predictability of the entire film, it was just a rehash of all the things that were fresh and original in the first Alien film. and then he goes and waters down that originality even more. What was startling about Alien/Blade Runner to a large extent was the dark dystopian vision he gave to the future - rusting industrial chains in a flow of dripping water inside a dank cavern-like bay on the Nostromo, for instance, grabbed the attention because up till then the future in all (sorry, almost all) films was silvery, bright, modern and shiny. Prometheus gives me nothing in the way of innovation, nothing at all, it's all been done before (by the the previously innovative Ridley Scott).
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:05 am
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Still not seen Prometheus, and I've skipped over the last few posts because there seems to be quite a lot of spoilering going on, but I find it very hard to believe that anything with Idris Elba in it, however small his part is in it, can be bad.
http://www.twitter.com/chrisbradish" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Tyrannosaur is on film4.
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Don't want to come across as a complete nerd but... You can travel to a star system a 100 light years away in 2 years, in fact you can travel practically any distance in any amount of time given enough speed. You might intuitively think that; given nothing can travel faster than light (actually all mass travels less than the speed of light (c)) the earliest you could get there is 100+ years, but in reality the faster you travel in the spatial dimensions, the less time you spend in the time dimension. If you were to travel at 99.9999% of c you could get there in 51days and 12hours.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Like Alien, some of the science is a little iffy too, for example in cryogenic sleep for two years to get to a star system with at least five suns! no way, there isn't a five sun system within 100 light years, never mind two (and that's assuming they travelled at the speed of light).
But that's not what I'm moaning about.
If you were to return to Earth however, it would still be 200+ years older.
Really not critising just thought 'twas interesting.
Last edited by Spartan2 on Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: What are you watching tonight?
You're Professor Brian Cox and I claim my £5.Spartan2 wrote:Don't want to come across as a complete nerd but... You can travel to a star system a 100 light years away in 2 years, in fact you can travel practically any distance in any amount of time given enough speed. You might intuitively think that; given nothing can travel faster than light (actually all mass travels less than the speed of light (c)) the earliest you could get there is 100+ years, but in reality the faster you travel in the spatial dimensions, the less time you spend in the time dimension. If you were to travel at 99.9999% of c you could get there in 51days and 12hours.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Like Alien, some of the science is a little iffy too, for example in cryogenic sleep for two years to get to a star system with at least five suns! no way, there isn't a five sun system within 100 light years, never mind two (and that's assuming they travelled at the speed of light).
But that's not what I'm moaning about.
If you were to return to Earth however, it would still be 200+ years older.
Really not critising just thought 'twas interesting. Prometheus was wank.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Wormholes, ffs. Do you guys know nothing ??
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Masterchef: The Professionals.
Blimey....not much good are they?
Blimey....not much good are they?
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Finally got round to watching Skyfall tonight, it was ace!
Definitely the best of the Daniel Craig era.
Definitely the best of the Daniel Craig era.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Whilst not generally disagreeing with your point, I know a few guys who've been on telly. The context has to be taken into account, its a programme designed to take people out of their comfort zone and pressurise them. Some of them (in more honest moments) will admit to going completely to pieces when under the glare of the studio lights.Annoyed Grunt wrote:Masterchef: The Professionals.
Blimey....not much good are they?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Re: What are you watching tonight?
keveh wrote:Finally got round to watching Skyfall tonight, it was ace!
Definitely the best of the Daniel Craig era.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36147
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Indeed. And the "skills test" they get them to do is prime example. Pick something and tell the camera that "this is a basic chef skill" like taking the meat out of a cooked lobster then making a salad.Lord Kangana wrote:Whilst not generally disagreeing with your point, I know a few guys who've been on telly. The context has to be taken into account, its a programme designed to take people out of their comfort zone and pressurise them. Some of them (in more honest moments) will admit to going completely to pieces when under the glare of the studio lights.Annoyed Grunt wrote:Masterchef: The Professionals.
Blimey....not much good are they?
Then ridicule the fecking pastry chef for not getting all the lobster meat out of the arm or sommat.....
I like masterchef in general, but this professional one really bugs the hell out of me.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: What are you watching tonight?
If you got wormholes in your spaceship all the air would escapebobo the clown wrote:Wormholes, ffs. Do you guys know nothing ??
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Aye, you're talking time dilation at relativistic speeds - but, however, you still need to speed up and then slow down from that relativistic speed and the timel apse (for the observer on the spaceship as opposed to on the Earth) would be far greater than two years - for a 100 light year journey it would, given accelerations/decelerations that could probably be achieved by 2089, be in the region of 81 years elapsed.Spartan2 wrote:Don't want to come across as a complete nerd but... You can travel to a star system a 100 light years away in 2 years, in fact you can travel practically any distance in any amount of time given enough speed. You might intuitively think that; given nothing can travel faster than light (actually all mass travels less than the speed of light (c)) the earliest you could get there is 100+ years, but in reality the faster you travel in the spatial dimensions, the less time you spend in the time dimension. If you were to travel at 99.9999% of c you could get there in 51days and 12hours.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Like Alien, some of the science is a little iffy too, for example in cryogenic sleep for two years to get to a star system with at least five suns! no way, there isn't a five sun system within 100 light years, never mind two (and that's assuming they travelled at the speed of light).
But that's not what I'm moaning about.
If you were to return to Earth however, it would still be 200+ years older.
Really not critising just thought 'twas interesting.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Our understanding of science and maths is primitive. One of the most thought provoking things Cox said was that if somehow humanity were to survive until our Sun turns into a red giant, our current state of evolution would appear to them as the earliest single cell microbes beside the initial sulphurous pools 2 billion years ago.
Re: What are you watching tonight?
we've got wormholes in the pews... do I need to be very afraid??Lost Leopard Spot wrote:If you got wormholes in your spaceship all the air would escapebobo the clown wrote:Wormholes, ffs. Do you guys know nothing ??
Re: What are you watching tonight?
watched the start of the second series of The Hour last night - Peter Capaldi has arrived as "Head of News" - in fact there are several well-drawn interesting characters... good stuff...
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Nobody can hear you scream in Devon.thebish wrote:we've got wormholes in the pews... do I need to be very afraid??Lost Leopard Spot wrote:If you got wormholes in your spaceship all the air would escapebobo the clown wrote:Wormholes, ffs. Do you guys know nothing ??
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8600
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: What are you watching tonight?
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Nobody can hear you scream in Devon.thebish wrote:we've got wormholes in the pews... do I need to be very afraid??Lost Leopard Spot wrote:If you got wormholes in your spaceship all the air would escapebobo the clown wrote:Wormholes, ffs. Do you guys know nothing ??
No, but they can hear I scream.
Re: What are you watching tonight?
mmmmmmmmmmmm - we have it for breakfast every day...Gary the Enfield wrote: No, but they can hear I scream.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests