The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: The Great Art Debate
Have you ever visited Milan ? The whole fckg place looks like the old New York underground. Every single building has graffiti on it. Every shop has metal shutters on the windows (which are covered in spray paint tags) as if they weren't the shop windows would be sprayed. The overall certainly detracts from the city.Bruce Rioja wrote:Did you bother to read what I asked?William the White wrote:Do you think it's impossible to make a judgement on anything at all?Bruce Rioja wrote:So where does the tipping point lie, Will, between what's acceptable graffiti and what isn't? Should there be an arts panel for this and who gets to sit on it? Graffiti's graffiti and we either allow it or we don't.William the White wrote:It is graffiti. He could do another, he certainly could. But he won't, I suspect.bobo the clown wrote:It's graffiti Will. He could knock another one out (so to speak) in the blink of an eye.
Clacton now pissed off they don't have a rival to Tracy in Margate.
Banksy cast the pearl before them. The swine do as they do...
Of course it's possible to make a judgement. Had this been carried out by Jackson Pollock then our friend would be claiming it to be something worthwhile whilst I'd be volunteering to drive the water cannon - two judgments for you right there. My questions remain - where does the tipping point lie? Who gets to sit in judgement and what would qualify then to do that? Until that question can be answered then all graffiti must be treated the same. We either allow it or we don't.
I can see that Banksy is a high quality and thought provoking graffiti artist, just as I can see that some skill has gone into the gable end murals we see and as exampled by Monty. I can even get that a council may permit it in certain specified places. But I'm not pro anyone deciding to deface things which they have no right to even if sometimes it can be quite artful.
Last edited by bobo the clown on Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
I did read it. i suppose I was responding to graffiti's graffiti and we either allow it or don't Thinking that you meant all or none. I now realise you were asking different questions.Bruce Rioja wrote:Did you bother to read what I asked?William the White wrote:Do you think it's impossible to make a judgement on anything at all?Bruce Rioja wrote:So where does the tipping point lie, Will, between what's acceptable graffiti and what isn't? Should there be an arts panel for this and who gets to sit on it? Graffiti's graffiti and we either allow it or we don't.William the White wrote:It is graffiti. He could do another, he certainly could. But he won't, I suspect.bobo the clown wrote:It's graffiti Will. He could knock another one out (so to speak) in the blink of an eye.
Clacton now pissed off they don't have a rival to Tracy in Margate.
Banksy cast the pearl before them. The swine do as they do...
Of course it's possible to make a judgement. Had this been carried out by Jackson Pollock then our friend would be claiming it to be something worthwhile whilst I'd be volunteering to drive the water cannon - two judgments for you right there. My questions remain - where does the tipping point lie? Who gets to sit in judgement and what would qualify then to do that? Until that question can be answered then all graffiti must be treated the same. We either allow it or we don't.
Bristol calls it street art when it makes the judgement that it's good and contributes well to the city (it took a good while for it to get to this position). When it's shit they consider it vandalism and get rid. I'm not sure how they make that judgement. But I'm all but certain the city will have an arts officer and maybe more than one and i expect he or she will be involved. I'd also like to see the surrounding community involved in any decision to keep or get rid. But again i don't know if this happens in Bristol or anywhere.
So - making judgements isn't necessarily easy, but it is possible.
and can be surprisingly popular:
http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/Attraction ... gland.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And recommend (written by the son of a good friend)
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Children-Can-Ye ... 1906477078" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by William the White on Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12940
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
I do not know for certain but I am fairly sure that building owners would have to sanction the 'art'. Spray painting slogans or pictures without permission is generally considered vandalism and subject to removal.bobo the clown wrote:
I can see that Banksy is a high quality and thought provoking graffiti artist, just as I can see that some skill has gone into the gable end murals we see and as exampled by Monty. I can even get that a council may permit it in certain specified places. But I'm not pro anyone deciding to deface things which they have no right to even if sometimes it can be quite artful.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
I don't know what happens now, but I'm certain that the early years of Bristol street art were unsanctioned.Montreal Wanderer wrote:I do not know for certain but I am fairly sure that building owners would have to sanction the 'art'. Spray painting slogans or pictures without permission is generally considered vandalism and subject to removal.bobo the clown wrote:
I can see that Banksy is a high quality and thought provoking graffiti artist, just as I can see that some skill has gone into the gable end murals we see and as exampled by Monty. I can even get that a council may permit it in certain specified places. But I'm not pro anyone deciding to deface things which they have no right to even if sometimes it can be quite artful.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12940
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
I was talking about Montreal, Bill - no idea about Bristol.William the White wrote:I don't know what happens now, but I'm certain that the early years of Bristol street art were unsanctioned.Montreal Wanderer wrote:I do not know for certain but I am fairly sure that building owners would have to sanction the 'art'. Spray painting slogans or pictures without permission is generally considered vandalism and subject to removal.bobo the clown wrote:
I can see that Banksy is a high quality and thought provoking graffiti artist, just as I can see that some skill has gone into the gable end murals we see and as exampled by Monty. I can even get that a council may permit it in certain specified places. But I'm not pro anyone deciding to deface things which they have no right to even if sometimes it can be quite artful.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
This Radio 3 programme on abstract art is well worth a listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04h7vtr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
An interesting panel apart from Paul Farley, a classic example of the shit, know-nothing, Scouse poet genre.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04h7vtr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
An interesting panel apart from Paul Farley, a classic example of the shit, know-nothing, Scouse poet genre.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Not yet listened to the programme...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:This Radio 3 programme on abstract art is well worth a listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04h7vtr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
An interesting panel apart from Paul Farley, a classic example of the shit, know-nothing, Scouse poet genre.
But Farley a very good poet - IMO...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Ha, trust you - ok, my pathological hatred of scousers has once again got the better of me. I don't really know his work, but there so often seems to be a 'poet' from Liverpool who crops up on this sort of thing, confusing speaking slowly with profundity.William the White wrote:Not yet listened to the programme...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:This Radio 3 programme on abstract art is well worth a listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04h7vtr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
An interesting panel apart from Paul Farley, a classic example of the shit, know-nothing, Scouse poet genre.
But Farley a very good poet - IMO...
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Well - I do like his poetry, a lot, but, I confess, he teaches Creative Writing at Lancaster Uni and awarded my daughter several first class marks for her poems. I may be slightly biased...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ha, trust you - ok, my pathological hatred of scousers has once again got the better of me. I don't really know his work, but there so often seems to be a 'poet' from Liverpool who crops up on this sort of thing, confusing speaking slowly with profundity.William the White wrote:Not yet listened to the programme...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:This Radio 3 programme on abstract art is well worth a listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04h7vtr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
An interesting panel apart from Paul Farley, a classic example of the shit, know-nothing, Scouse poet genre.
But Farley a very good poet - IMO...
But there's no way he requires inverted commas around 'poet'.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
They weren't for him... I'm just saying that the slow-speaking, pseudo-profound Scouse poet seems to be a distinct genre whether it's voiceovers for football montages, panel discussions, or whatever.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: The Great Art Debate
I was only able to read that by hearing it in the manner of Lucien from 'The Liver Birds'.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:They weren't for him... I'm just saying that the slow-speaking, pseudo-profound Scouse poet seems to be a distinct genre whether it's voiceovers for football montages, panel discussions, or whatever.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: The Great Art Debate
I quite like some of this collection of Pawel Kuczynski's satirical work...
http://www.artfido.com/blog/paintings-t ... his-world/
http://www.artfido.com/blog/paintings-t ... his-world/
Re: The Great Art Debate
V good. Like the ladder one in particular.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: The Great Art Debate
I see a Banksie piece has been the victim of ...... graffiti !
Now, Alanis THAT is irony.
Now, Alanis THAT is irony.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43218
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Discovered an English impressionist of modern times (died in 1975) Edward Seago. Particularly like this for its sheer simplicity.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
^^^ What did he do with the other half of the potato, d'ya think?
May the bridges I burn light your way
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43218
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Even artists have to eat.....Bruce Rioja wrote:^^^ What did he do with the other half of the potato, d'ya think?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
So Folkestone now has the same number of Banksy pieces as Clacton.
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/folkestone/ ... for-26264/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
What a circus.
Have seen lots of art recently but nothing tops the exhibition of Schiele's nudes I saw at the Courtauld today. Best exhibition of 2014, for me.
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/folkestone/ ... for-26264/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
What a circus.
Have seen lots of art recently but nothing tops the exhibition of Schiele's nudes I saw at the Courtauld today. Best exhibition of 2014, for me.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12940
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
Hmmm! His nudes always struck me that they were suffering from sexually transmitted diseases, or possibly ebola.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So Folkestone now has the same number of Banksy pieces as Clacton.
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/folkestone/ ... for-26264/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
What a circus.
Have seen lots of art recently but nothing tops the exhibition of Schiele's nudes I saw at the Courtauld today. Best exhibition of 2014, for me.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests