creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by bobo the clown » Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:06 am

I hate this short-form cricket.

Cricket should last days and often have no clear conclusion. Highly capable players knocking shite out of everything in site is a poor offering.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36078
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:08 am

bobo the clown wrote:I hate this short-form cricket.

Cricket should last days and often have no clear conclusion. Highly capable players knocking shite out of everything in site is a poor offering.
I saw Buttler hit the record fastest 100 for an Englishman the other day in the 50 over game.

That was pretty thrilling. There is a place for it. I generally prefer tests but the shorter forms have their own art and can be compelling in a way.

You can't beat good test matches though sadly the way pitches are today sometimes tests can be dreadful.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon May 09, 2016 6:35 pm

By the way, and as has been mentioned elsewhere on here, the midlife crisis has led me to playing cricket again. Now then, very little has changed since I used to play, one thing that has though is that if the team that fields first gets the batting side all out within their allocated overs then when that side goes in to bat they get awarded the unused overs. How long's that been an actual thing? :conf:
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 32382
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Mon May 09, 2016 7:04 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:By the way, and as has been mentioned elsewhere on here, the midlife crisis has led me to playing cricket again. Now then, very little has changed since I used to play, one thing that has though is that if the team that fields first gets the batting side all out within their allocated overs then when that side goes in to bat they get awarded the unused overs. How long's that been an actual thing? :conf:
I don't think all Leagues use the same rules for stuff like that - they never really did. I've been in Leagues where they've played that rule, ones where you get 50 overs per side regardless and others where you play 5 hour cricket (that used to be fun - Side batting first could bat if memory serves three hours, leaving side batting second 1 hour + a minimum of 20 overs.)

sonnee
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 5:45 am

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by sonnee » Wed May 25, 2016 6:23 am

LOLLL
ทดลองเล่นเกมส์บาคาร่าออนไลน์ที่ดีที่สุด บนเว็บไซด์คาสิโนอันดับ1ของประเทศไทย เปิดบัญชีฟรี ฝากถอดไม่จำกัด คลิกที่นี่ บาคาร่าออนไลน์
Last edited by sonnee on Thu Jun 30, 2016 5:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri May 27, 2016 10:45 am

Cook wins the toss and puts us in to bat in perfect bowling conditions. :? #prayforsun
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43231
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri May 27, 2016 10:46 am

Same team apart from Woakes for Stokes (has a ring to it that) :wink: and we're batting first, Cook's decision.

It's Lancs v Yorks on Sunday. Pity Jimmy will be missing.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Fri May 27, 2016 10:46 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:Cook wins the toss and puts us in to bat in perfect bowling conditions. :? #prayforsun

it worked well enough last time! :D

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri May 27, 2016 11:39 am

thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Cook wins the toss and puts us in to bat in perfect bowling conditions. :? #prayforsun

it worked well enough last time! :D
True enough :D

Actually, their lad says that he'd have had a bat too had he won the toss.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43231
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri May 27, 2016 12:21 pm

Captain Cook might be just a few short of a record total but he's going through a pretty lean spell right now. Out for 15.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri May 27, 2016 12:30 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:Captain Cook might be just a few short of a record total but he's going through a pretty lean spell right now. Out for 15.
The shot that he was out to was a fecking disgrace. I've no idea how he's got so many runs. All any bowler has to do is bowl well outside off stump and as sure as shite Cook will attempt to play a ball that doesn't need playing, with a flat bat, and will stick it into slip. How many times have we seen him do this? The bloke's a fecking imbecile! I wouldn't mind so much if he was attempting a square cut, or indeed any discernible attacking stroke.
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Fri May 27, 2016 12:32 pm

aye - but an imbecilic fecking disgrace with 9,995 test runs! :-)

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri May 27, 2016 12:36 pm

thebish wrote:aye - but an imbecilic fecking disgrace with 9,995 test runs! :-)
Which makes the shot that he's just got himself out with all the more imbecilic.

Have a look - it's on here at 12:02, the fecking imbecile. :)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/cricket/36045328" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Fri May 27, 2016 12:46 pm

compton's gone now...

we've probably already got enough to win, though... :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43231
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri May 27, 2016 12:49 pm

Cook's scored only once over fifty in his last ten innings (says the Guardian commentator).
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Fri May 27, 2016 12:58 pm

that Compton catch was a CRACKING catch!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43231
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri May 27, 2016 1:18 pm

Had a chuckle at this comment on the Guardian site:

“I have always imagined young royals are allowed to bat all day, while the footmen take it in turns to bowl dolly-drops and the faithful old retainer, Strawberry, fields forever.”

:lol:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri May 27, 2016 1:32 pm

thebish wrote:that Compton catch was a CRACKING catch!
Just seen it. The lad steps forward initially but recovered superbly. As you say, a CRACKING catch. Fair play.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43231
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri May 27, 2016 4:25 pm

Been out this afternoon but come back to a decent 222-4. Another cracking innings from Joe Root.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 43231
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri May 27, 2016 6:20 pm

310-6 at stumps is pretty decent. We had 297? all out, first test but as ever it all depends on our attack when they get in.
Cook and Compton were real let downs for top end batsmen, but Root and Bairstow pulled us out. Moen Ali going good right now.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests