General Chit Chat
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9125
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: General Chit Chat
Nah, he was on the golf course at the time. For him to have done it he'd have had to get round it in no time and..hang on you could be onto something HobohHoboh wrote:I was thinking more little fat man in NK tbhLittle Green Man wrote:Vincent Tan's got it hidden deep inside a hollowed-out volcanoHoboh wrote:Who the hell has that plane?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: General Chit Chat
The bloke who washed my hair at the hairdressers today just about managed to pull off having a beard - though it wasn't one of those huge thick bushy ones so perhaps that's why. And Lever End IS a serial killer. I've seen evidence.Bijou Bob wrote:Beards will NEVER be fashionable and are the preserve of flashers, serial killers and geography teachers with acne scarring.
Re: General Chit Chat
SSShhhhhhhhhhh!!!!Gooner Girl wrote:The bloke who washed my hair at the hairdressers today just about managed to pull off having a beard - though it wasn't one of those huge thick bushy ones so perhaps that's why. And Lever End IS a serial killer. I've seen evidence.Bijou Bob wrote:Beards will NEVER be fashionable and are the preserve of flashers, serial killers and geography teachers with acne scarring.
...
-
- Promising
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Is that why you had to move schools...LeverEnd wrote:SSShhhhhhhhhhh!!!!Gooner Girl wrote:The bloke who washed my hair at the hairdressers today just about managed to pull off having a beard - though it wasn't one of those huge thick bushy ones so perhaps that's why. And Lever End IS a serial killer. I've seen evidence.Bijou Bob wrote:Beards will NEVER be fashionable and are the preserve of flashers, serial killers and geography teachers with acne scarring.
"Oh f**k off you daft southern c**t"
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: General Chit Chat
Hang on. My limited knowledge of betting tells me that if you place an accumulator bet and your first horse comes nowhere then that's the rest of your bet gone for a shit too. Your pal's a money laundering drug dealer. Inform the authorities immediately or else you're an accomplice and a peddler of death.Worthy4England wrote:Mate of mine won 42 grand on an accumulator at Cheltenham yesterday. His first horse was favourite and came nowhere...would have been heading up to 250k had that one come in too...
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: General Chit Chat
That's what I thought - the first part anyway.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. My limited knowledge of betting tells me that if you place an accumulator bet and your first horse comes nowhere then that's the rest of your bet gone for a shit too. Your pal's a money laundering drug dealer. Inform the authorities immediately or else you're an accomplice and a peddler of death.Worthy4England wrote:Mate of mine won 42 grand on an accumulator at Cheltenham yesterday. His first horse was favourite and came nowhere...would have been heading up to 250k had that one come in too...
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Dujon
- Passionate
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
- Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
- Contact:
Re: General Chit Chat
Me too, Worthy, please enlighten us. Perhaps he meant he would have won the money if he'd started his run after the first race; or perhaps he laid a second bet after the first had lapsed? I'm 'confuserated'.
Re: General Chit Chat
Double shusssssssshhhhhhhhhhhh!!danhorwich wrote:Is that why you had to move schools...LeverEnd wrote:SSShhhhhhhhhhh!!!!Gooner Girl wrote:The bloke who washed my hair at the hairdressers today just about managed to pull off having a beard - though it wasn't one of those huge thick bushy ones so perhaps that's why. And Lever End IS a serial killer. I've seen evidence.Bijou Bob wrote:Beards will NEVER be fashionable and are the preserve of flashers, serial killers and geography teachers with acne scarring.
...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32648
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Depends what type of accumulator it is. There are ones that if one horse goes down, the whole lot is gone because of a single horse. What my mate bet was a Lucky 15, which is 15 bets within one. At £4 per bet (you pick the stake) so it was a £60 win bet. To go each way it would have been double.Montreal Wanderer wrote:That's what I thought - the first part anyway.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. My limited knowledge of betting tells me that if you place an accumulator bet and your first horse comes nowhere then that's the rest of your bet gone for a shit too. Your pal's a money laundering drug dealer. Inform the authorities immediately or else you're an accomplice and a peddler of death.Worthy4England wrote:Mate of mine won 42 grand on an accumulator at Cheltenham yesterday. His first horse was favourite and came nowhere...would have been heading up to 250k had that one come in too...
You get 4 singles (so any of your horses winning will pay the single) - that's 4 bets.
You get 6 doubles (horse 1&2, 1&3, 1&4, 2&3, 2&4, 3&4)
4 trebles (horse 1,2&3, 1,2&4, 1,3&4, 2,3&4)
1 fourfold (1,2,3,4)
So his favourite not coming in, lost him 7 bets, he still won on the other 8.
it would have been a huge win, had his other come in.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32648
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Just worked out, it would have been £428k if his last had come in, but the bookies would have only paid to their max, which I think was £250k
Re: General Chit Chat
Worthy4England wrote:Depends what type of accumulator it is. There are ones that if one horse goes down, the whole lot is gone because of a single horse. What my mate bet was a Lucky 15, which is 15 bets within one. At £4 per bet (you pick the stake) so it was a £60 win bet. To go each way it would have been double.Montreal Wanderer wrote:That's what I thought - the first part anyway.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. My limited knowledge of betting tells me that if you place an accumulator bet and your first horse comes nowhere then that's the rest of your bet gone for a shit too. Your pal's a money laundering drug dealer. Inform the authorities immediately or else you're an accomplice and a peddler of death.Worthy4England wrote:Mate of mine won 42 grand on an accumulator at Cheltenham yesterday. His first horse was favourite and came nowhere...would have been heading up to 250k had that one come in too...
You get 4 singles (so any of your horses winning will pay the single) - that's 4 bets.
You get 6 doubles (horse 1&2, 1&3, 1&4, 2&3, 2&4, 3&4)
4 trebles (horse 1,2&3, 1,2&4, 1,3&4, 2,3&4)
1 fourfold (1,2,3,4)
So his favourite not coming in, lost him 7 bets, he still won on the other 8.
it would have been a huge win, had his other come in.
That's either Ladbrokes or Bet Fred. Both are good with this type of 'lucky 15/30 etc' type of bet. Good on yer mate Worthy. For what it's worth, my grandad once won the ITV 7 in the seventies. John Rickman 'n all............
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32648
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
He's probably just got back 35 years wirth of giving 'em £20 a week.Il Pirate wrote:Worthy4England wrote:Depends what type of accumulator it is. There are ones that if one horse goes down, the whole lot is gone because of a single horse. What my mate bet was a Lucky 15, which is 15 bets within one. At £4 per bet (you pick the stake) so it was a £60 win bet. To go each way it would have been double.Montreal Wanderer wrote:That's what I thought - the first part anyway.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. My limited knowledge of betting tells me that if you place an accumulator bet and your first horse comes nowhere then that's the rest of your bet gone for a shit too. Your pal's a money laundering drug dealer. Inform the authorities immediately or else you're an accomplice and a peddler of death.Worthy4England wrote:Mate of mine won 42 grand on an accumulator at Cheltenham yesterday. His first horse was favourite and came nowhere...would have been heading up to 250k had that one come in too...
You get 4 singles (so any of your horses winning will pay the single) - that's 4 bets.
You get 6 doubles (horse 1&2, 1&3, 1&4, 2&3, 2&4, 3&4)
4 trebles (horse 1,2&3, 1,2&4, 1,3&4, 2,3&4)
1 fourfold (1,2,3,4)
So his favourite not coming in, lost him 7 bets, he still won on the other 8.
it would have been a huge win, had his other come in.
That's either Ladbrokes or Bet Fred. Both are good with this type of 'lucky 15/30 etc' type of bet. Good on yer mate Worthy. For what it's worth, my grandad once won the ITV 7 in the seventies. John Rickman 'n all............
- Dujon
- Passionate
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
- Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
- Contact:
Re: General Chit Chat
Thanks, Worthy. That information shows what little I know about gambling. I have always thought that an 'accumulator' was a series of bets where the winnings from the first selection is re-invested in the second and any winnings from the second re-invested in the third . . . and so on. Any break in the sequence means your investment (as usual I suspect) finishes in the bookie's bank account. Well you live and you learn.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: General Chit Chat
You understood the explanation, Dujon? I'm just taking his word for it...Dujon wrote:Thanks, Worthy. That information shows what little I know about gambling. I have always thought that an 'accumulator' was a series of bets where the winnings from the first selection is re-invested in the second and any winnings from the second re-invested in the third . . . and so on. Any break in the sequence means your investment (as usual I suspect) finishes in the bookie's bank account. Well you live and you learn.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32648
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
That is also an accumulator. But it's a single bet. So not that far out.Dujon wrote:Thanks, Worthy. That information shows what little I know about gambling. I have always thought that an 'accumulator' was a series of bets where the winnings from the first selection is re-invested in the second and any winnings from the second re-invested in the third . . . and so on. Any break in the sequence means your investment (as usual I suspect) finishes in the bookie's bank account. Well you live and you learn.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: General Chit Chat
Did anyone hear Bez on the wireless this morning? I think he'd had drugs for breakfast. He's after taking over from Hazel Blears with his campaign to make beehives.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: General Chit Chat
Crikey. This is a rum do.
http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/ne ... ?ref=var_0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/ne ... ?ref=var_0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent
Re: General Chit Chat
Walking the dog last night stumbled upon a large frog, showed it to the dog who decided to try and pee on it!! No idea why he would do that vile wee git.
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:51 am
- Location: Mordor
Re: General Chit Chat
I applaud your dog sir, it's what should be done to all French peopleRaven wrote:Walking the dog last night stumbled upon a large frog, showed it to the dog who decided to try and pee on it!! No idea why he would do that vile wee git.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: General Chit Chat
I use, well used mostly these days as the twins are pretty much potty trained reusable nappies, and so belong to a few buying and selling groups on facebook (yes, I know...) Anyway, one went for the other day for £40! For a nappy! I'm thinking of starting a new business. Easy money!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests