Well, I'd never have thought this ...

[thebish]

I also think that given mud sticks in particular with these cases, that defendants should be granted anonymity too. I know it can sometimes lead to others coming forward, but I don't think that is a fair price.

In this day and age, Pru, what chance anonymity for anyone? The press, paparazzi or CCTV cameras will get you somewhere along the line. Even 1984 is almost thirty years in the past.

they managed it with the girl who accused him...

[Prufrock]

I also think that given mud sticks in particular with these cases, that defendants should be granted anonymity too. I know it can sometimes lead to others coming forward, but I don't think that is a fair price.

In this day and age, Pru, what chance anonymity for anyone? The press, paparazzi or CCTV cameras will get you somewhere along the line. Even 1984 is almost thirty years in the past.

What's the girl called?

[TANGODANCER]

I also think that given mud sticks in particular with these cases, that defendants should be granted anonymity too. I know it can sometimes lead to others coming forward, but I don't think that is a fair price.

In this day and age, Pru, what chance anonymity for anyone? The press, paparazzi or CCTV cameras will get you somewhere along the line. Even 1984 is almost thirty years in the past.

What's the girl called?

I really have no idea because the law has put a block on her identity. Someone will know.

[bobo the clown]

I also think that given mud sticks in particular with these cases, that defendants should be granted anonymity too. I know it can sometimes lead to others coming forward, but I don't think that is a fair price.

In this day and age, Pru, what chance anonymity for anyone? The press, paparazzi or CCTV cameras will get you somewhere along the line. Even 1984 is almost thirty years in the past.

What's the girl called?

I really have no idea because the law has put a block on her identity. Someone will know.

2 guys tweeted it ... they are both now arrested.

[Bruce Rioja]

I also think that given mud sticks in particular with these cases, that defendants should be granted anonymity too. I know it can sometimes lead to others coming forward, but I don't think that is a fair price.

In this day and age, Pru, what chance anonymity for anyone? The press, paparazzi or CCTV cameras will get you somewhere along the line. Even 1984 is almost thirty years in the past.

What's the girl called?

I really have no idea because the law has put a block on her identity. Someone will know.

Ergo - successful anonymity.

[Lost Leopard Spot]

Well all I can say is that it razzes my goat that somebody who may well be, and probably is, on the balance of probability based on the facts as far as I know them, A LIAR, can be as equally anonymous as those two utter cnuts who without a doubt murdered James Bulger, and yet a man who was accused of a heinous crime and found Not Guilty can, because his name is in the public arena, still have such mud thrown at him as 'well he might not be innocent' wink wink. FFS, the law, and some of its proponents are clearly ass like in this respect.

[Lost Leopard Spot]

Clearly the answer should be to grant, or remove, anonymity, in Toto. Much less pissin' about with people's lives whichever option is chosen.

[Il Pirate]

can be as equally anonymous as those two utter cnuts who without a doubt murdered James Bulger



I think you'll find they were never granted anonimity.............................

[Lost Leopard Spot]

can be as equally anonymous as those two utter cnuts who without a doubt murdered James Bulger



I think you'll find they were never granted anonimity.............................

I beg to differ. They were given state sponsored new identities and the law says that those identities are anonymous and shall not be divulged...exactly.the same anonymity with equal rights under the law as we are talking about here.

[Montreal Wanderer]

The second is the legal position. It's a fundamental principle of the constitution of this country, and all civilised ones, that you are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Is this true in Scotland, Pru? "Not proven" generally implies guilt and certainly does not imply innocence. Oh wait - you said civilized countries. Never mind.

[Gary the Enfield]

can be as equally anonymous as those two utter cnuts who without a doubt murdered James Bulger



I think you'll find they were never granted anonimity.............................

I beg to differ. They were given state sponsored new identities and the law says that those identities are anonymous and shall not be divulged...exactly.the same anonymity with equal rights under the law as we are talking about here.

One of them is on his FOURTH new identity. The cvnt.

[bobo the clown]

can be as equally anonymous as those two utter cnuts who without a doubt murdered James Bulger

I think you'll find they were never granted anonimity.............................

I beg to differ. They were given state sponsored new identities and the law says that those identities are anonymous and shall not be divulged...exactly.the same anonymity with equal rights under the law as we are talking about here.

One of them is on his FOURTH new identity. The cvnt.

The first 3 of those were Joey Barton !!

[Beefheart]

I only ever knew of him from the Led Zeppelin song 'Hats off', but Roy Harper appears to be the latest to be charged.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-he ... r-24955436" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Gary the Enfield]

I only ever knew of him from the Led Zeppelin song 'Hats off', but Roy Harper appears to be the latest to be charged.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-he ... r-24955436" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Jesus fecking Christ is there anyone in the entertainment industry from the seventies who ISN'T a nonce?

Just reading about this guy's contribution to one of the best albums of all time (Wish you were here) only to find I'm glad I fecking WASN'T!!!!!!!

[Bruce Rioja]

A Priest, a rapist and a paedophile walk into a bar. So, he orders a drink................

[Bruce Rioja]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-25108439" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[mrkint]

Been following the reporters in the court who were tweeting it. Genuinely felt sick in the stomach reading through it.

[boltonboris]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-25108439" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

How is his name there for all to see, but 'Woman A' & 'Woman B' remain anonymous?

[mrkint]

naming the women would make it possible to identify the victim(s), and as the victims must remain anonymous i guess that's why they are too.

[LeverEnd]

naming the women would make it possible to identify the victim(s), and as the victims must remain anonymous i guess that's why they are too.

Yes it's not for their protection but because of the staggering fact that they offered their own children for abuse, and their anonymity is protected. They really should be forcibly sterilised. On no account must they ever be able to conceive again.
What a horrendous piece of shit he is. Makes you wonder what the other band members knew/suspected.