keeleys just gone up in my estimation

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:48 am

keveh wrote:

http://www.totallynsfw.com/videos/video ... l_sextape/

that's shit

and he keeps his socks on, amateur

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:11 am

surely a pro for keeping his socks on?

CrazyHorse · Post by **CrazyHorse** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:14 am

hisroyalgingerness wrote:
keveh wrote:

http://www.totallynsfw.com/videos/video ... l_sextape/
that's shit

and he keeps his socks on, amateur

So you're a foot man, eh?

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:16 pm

Things That Make You Go Hmmm...
Just three days after the leaking of a homemade sex tape, The Sun reports that 'Page 3 babe' Keeley Hazell 'is in talks to play a life-saving beauty in Baywatch: The Movie.'

Apparently, producers "said a lot of nice complimentary things" to her.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:33 pm

Batman wrote: Apparently, producers "said a lot of nice complimentary things" to her.

Like "Just get your laughing tackle around this, darling" ?

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:42 pm

Just watched it, it's rather eye-opening.

Made the error of clicking on the link for the Sunderland 'roasting' video too = crap video.

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:38 am

hisroyalgingerness wrote:
keveh wrote:

http://www.totallynsfw.com/videos/video ... l_sextape/
that's shit

and he keeps his socks on, amateur

Were they white? I couldn't watch since it was NWS.

mummywhycantieatcrayons · Post by **mummywhycantieatcrayons** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:45 am

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
hisroyalgingerness wrote:
keveh wrote:

http://www.totallynsfw.com/videos/video ... l_sextape/
that's shit

and he keeps his socks on, amateur
Were they white? I couldn't watch since it was NWS.

Yes.... come to think of it.... I thought they looked familiar!

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:52 am

So long as they have the good old Reebok swish.

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:54 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:So long as they have the good old Reebok swish.

isn't that a Nike Swoosh?

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 7:54 pm

communistworkethic wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:So long as they have the good old Reebok swish.
isn't that a Nike Swoosh?

Indeed, just a bit of misdirection humour.

cowdrill · Post by **cowdrill** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:13 pm

enuff of this banter

on with the gratuitous nudity

Connect with your social network account

keeleys just gone up in my estimation

Who is online