To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14072
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Not surprised Clark is frustrated!
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28762
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Did he complain when their centre-back made a save?
Last edited by Dave Sutton's barnet on Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Was going to say I think that levels it up a bit.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:04 pmDid he complain when their centre-back made a save?
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
We’re so disjointed.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Is this referee got previous with us in terms of not being one for giving free kicks in our favour?
Saw his previous results for us and it seems decent enough, nothing silly like red cards or anything like that, but for some reason i'm acutely aware there was one or two that seem to be a little questionable in terms of whether we get free kicks in the opposing half.
Saw his previous results for us and it seems decent enough, nothing silly like red cards or anything like that, but for some reason i'm acutely aware there was one or two that seem to be a little questionable in terms of whether we get free kicks in the opposing half.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
This is almost certainly an oversimplification based on two poor performances, but it does feel as though we could do with some fresh faces in the squad.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
It's about the subs time.
Vic's had a quiet second half but i'd not be keen on subbing him off.
Feel like it's about the time to get Dempsey on for Sheehan or Maghoma.
I'm expecting Bod and Dempsey on for one of those two in mid, and one of the the top two.
Vic's had a quiet second half but i'd not be keen on subbing him off.
Feel like it's about the time to get Dempsey on for Sheehan or Maghoma.
I'm expecting Bod and Dempsey on for one of those two in mid, and one of the the top two.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Take a bow Randell. That was lovely.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
He seems happy to let the game run. I don't think we're helping ourselves by launching over liket he opposition.Mar wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:05 pmIs this referee got previous with us in terms of not being one for giving free kicks in our favour?
Saw his previous results for us and it seems decent enough, nothing silly like red cards or anything like that, but for some reason i'm acutely aware there was one or two that seem to be a little questionable in terms of whether we get free kicks in the opposing half.
Santos clearly bundled their lad over there and he didn't give anything so I don't think it's us.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Good lad, Randy.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Randy on a promise. Great run.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14072
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Good work Randy. Well done JDC kept it inside the stadium!
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28762
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14072
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
FFS Toal!!!! Does the hard bit then a lazy pass!
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Missed it, did he perhaps hit it into the foot of the on rushing player?
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
That's usually my go-to when thinking about referee decisions. Barring the obvious cynical jokes of sending off of course.DJBlu wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:11 pmHe seems happy to let the game run. I don't think we're helping ourselves by launching over liket he opposition.Mar wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:05 pmIs this referee got previous with us in terms of not being one for giving free kicks in our favour?
Saw his previous results for us and it seems decent enough, nothing silly like red cards or anything like that, but for some reason i'm acutely aware there was one or two that seem to be a little questionable in terms of whether we get free kicks in the opposing half.
Santos clearly bundled their lad over there and he didn't give anything so I don't think it's us.
There's the odd ref that gives a notably different quality of refereeing for both sides and those are harder to identify.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Sheehan with the great defending!
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14072
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
Re: To be continued. Home to Cheltenham, Tues Jan 23rd , 7-45.
officer_dibble wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:16 pmNo, rolled it into his path! The tit!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot], irie Cee Bee, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 189 guests