Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

nicholaldo
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by nicholaldo » Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:25 pm

To be fair, it's theoretically possible that she did receive such a salary. The mistake is in stating that each of them did.

Enoch
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by Enoch » Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:37 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:10 pm
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:04 pm
Enoch wrote:
Sat Jan 12, 2019 3:58 pm
Ah, so all those posts about her 199 Large can be amended?
I'm sure they will be. One of the things you note after a while on here is how quick people are to admit when they're wrong.
:lol:
I see what you mean.

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 16200
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:38 pm

nicholaldo wrote:
Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:25 pm
To be fair, it's theoretically possible that she did receive such a salary. The mistake is in stating that each of them did.
It's theoretically possible you might actually know facts to which I'm unconversant.
So. As 'she' is not a director, how the fxck would 'she' be paid £199,000?.

Just asking.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

nicholaldo
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by nicholaldo » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:58 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:38 pm
nicholaldo wrote:
Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:25 pm
To be fair, it's theoretically possible that she did receive such a salary. The mistake is in stating that each of them did.
It's theoretically possible you might actually know facts to which I'm unconversant.
So. As 'she' is not a director, how the fxck would 'she' be paid £199,000?.

Just asking.

She was a director during the period that the figures quoted above were paid. For her to have been paid £199,000 it would've required Ken and Dean (the other two directors) to have either not drawn a salary at all or to have split the remaining amount - anything up to £999.99 - between them. So practically speaking she obviously wouldn't have been, but it is theoretically possible that she could.

BWFC_Insane made an error in thinking that the threshold of £199,999.99, after which directors salaries have to be disclosed, relates to each individual director rather than the total amount paid to all directors. And you, presumably, were mistaken in thinking that the salaries being discussed related to the here and now.

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 16200
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:14 pm

nicholaldo wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:58 pm
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:38 pm
nicholaldo wrote:
Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:25 pm
To be fair, it's theoretically possible that she did receive such a salary. The mistake is in stating that each of them did.
It's theoretically possible you might actually know facts to which I'm unconversant.
So. As 'she' is not a director, how the fxck would 'she' be paid £199,000?.

Just asking.

She was a director during the period that the figures quoted above were paid. For her to have been paid £199,000 it would've required Ken and Dean (the other two directors) to have either not drawn a salary at all or to have split the remaining amount - anything up to £999.99 - between them. So practically speaking she obviously wouldn't have been, but it is theoretically possible that she could.

BWFC_Insane made an error in thinking that the threshold of £199,999, after which directors salaries have to be disclosed, relates to each individual director rather than the total amount paid to all directors. And you, presumably, were mistaken in thinking that the salaries being discussed related to the here and now.
I presumed the salaries being discussed were certainly post-Deano, yes. If they weren't then yes, we are talking at cross purposes
Thanks for the clearing up.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

Enoch
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by Enoch » Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:20 pm

nicholaldo wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:58 pm
BWFC_Insane made an error
You, Sir, are clearly deluded!

BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24185
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:03 am

nicholaldo wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:58 pm
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:38 pm
nicholaldo wrote:
Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:25 pm
To be fair, it's theoretically possible that she did receive such a salary. The mistake is in stating that each of them did.
It's theoretically possible you might actually know facts to which I'm unconversant.
So. As 'she' is not a director, how the fxck would 'she' be paid £199,000?.

Just asking.

She was a director during the period that the figures quoted above were paid. For her to have been paid £199,000 it would've required Ken and Dean (the other two directors) to have either not drawn a salary at all or to have split the remaining amount - anything up to £999.99 - between them. So practically speaking she obviously wouldn't have been, but it is theoretically possible that she could.

BWFC_Insane made an error in thinking that the threshold of £199,999.99, after which directors salaries have to be disclosed, relates to each individual director rather than the total amount paid to all directors. And you, presumably, were mistaken in thinking that the salaries being discussed related to the here and now.
Fair do's! That'll teach me for looking at twitter!

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 16200
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:10 pm

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6958
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by TKIZ! » Sat Jan 19, 2019 9:54 am

Banning Supa John is a massive mistake. Ken has now gone full Trump. However, I don't see what protest is going to achieve? Ken knows he has to sell, surely getting behind the team is what's important?
Pfffft.

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 16200
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: Planned protest. WBA @ home 21/01/2019 8pm

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Sat Jan 19, 2019 1:34 pm

Wise words from The Banned One (sorry, one of the banned ones)...

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/1 ... west-brom/
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests