Search found 745 matches
ffs Sluffy. You weren't happy, you left. You started your own site up ... you're very pleased with that. Good, I'm pleased. You came on here to offer some advice , thanks ... it's been noted. Now give it a rest. I was happy to do just that! I had no hidden agenda. I've simply defended myself agains...
What?Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on, the point of your tedious beef is because there was/is a Mods forum, that you weren't invited into by dint of you not being a Mod.sluffy wrote: I simply wanted a Mods forum
I was a mod.
There may be a Mods only forum now but there certainly wasn't when I was doing the job.
So if I understand it right Sluffy, and by your own words, you wanted to ban four people ( in your very short time as a mod) because you're a fair-minded chap, but the mods didn't want to do that because they were all their mates on a secret forum where half-a-dozen admin/mods and some good dozen o...
The idea of the Think Tank, of which I was a member, was simply to drum up additional ideas for the site regarding recurrent themes such as the 'What Are You....' threads, front page articles, items for the paper edition which we handed out a few years ago and so on. That was all. It wasn't to beco...
Maybe. I'm sure anyone can feel free to put there name forward. Let's not bicker over a changing of the tides. Hopefully when you pack your forum in sluffy you'll get volunteers to take over. As it stands i doubt that to be the case. We're here because we've had a good deal of community content ove...
There is no "secret forum" you silly fxcking man. There is a think tank from whence the general site is run. There is also a finance and corporate business link which you insisted you should be given access to and were politely told that was none of your business. It wasn't. Now you are here shxt -...
I don't think anyone has ruled anyone out sluffy. As far as I understand it its a simple case of this is the situation as is and if it is to persist then work is involved. Its certainly not equivalent to starting a fresh forum from scratch as you seem to be eluding to. Of course there are people mo...
Didn't take long, did it? I see you are still harping on about things taken from you here, well nothing ever was. I was there, remember? You weren't suitable as a mod because you wanted to crash in and start making your own rules after being invited on to the Mods forum. Your points about fairness ...
Well thank you for your kind words Kevin. Maybe the point I was making is that the person you could hand your site over too doesn't need to have their own hosting facility or even know much about computers at all but up to now have ruled themselves out simply because they think you have to, to be ab...
Probably going to get jumped on for this but here goes anyway. Some of the older members on here may remember me as being an active contributer on here some years back, indeed I was briefly a mod on this site before that priviledge was taken from me for wanting the forum to be vastly more fairer and...
- Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:52 pm
- Forum: The Trotters
- Topic: Abdoulaye's going t'Souk transfer thread
- Replies: 3318
- Views: 233692
Yes they did. A rather a long article I posted on Bolton Nuts forum about Deeney if anyone is interested - One to Watch out for - Watford - Troy Deeney Shame Owen sign his partner up front - Sordell! http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/Troy_Deeney.jpg/220px-Troy_Deeney.jpg Born ...
- Thu May 15, 2014 11:56 pm
- Forum: The Trotters
- Topic: Swansea release David N Gog
- Replies: 105
- Views: 9453
Michael Ricketts.thebish wrote: arse! so beckford is 6th best strike rate since McGinlay - still not bad!
did i miss anyone?
68 starts, 44 subs, 46 goals.