Do we

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:11 pm

seanworth wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:On reflection Bruno's ban will not be permanent. It will be for one month and it will expire on 21 December. Any further ban will indeed be permanent. Hopefully he will accept this opportunity. There won't be any more.
While many might disagree, Zulu I commend you on your decision in this particular case. If it had been for some abuse against another poster then a permanent ban would certainly have been warranted. Get the feeling he probably had a few too many pints before that post, which of course I did not see so I shall shut up now.

Agreed. I saw the topic in question, it was daft and innapropriate but I think the mods have got this one right. Fair play.

Wandering Willy · Post by **Wandering Willy** » Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:38 pm

I'm a proponent of a non cumulative "sin bin" punishment system - some indiscretions can be punished by a ban period that is separate to, but not a replacement for, the 'serious' offence system currently in place.

More work for the mods though.

Just an idea.

Hoboh · Post by **Hoboh** » Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:54 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:On reflection Bruno's ban will not be permanent. It will be for one month and it will expire on 21 December. Any further ban will indeed be permanent. Hopefully he will accept this opportunity. There won't be any more.

Sh*t he's coming back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Have I called him anywhere??????????????????????????

Oh B*gger it, you cannot be serious in overturning this ban!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You lefties, liberal, mods you!!

Stick to talking about our new manager who be in place by the time yer bans up Bruno!!!

Wandering Willy · Post by **Wandering Willy** » Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:08 pm

Does this ruling mean the ROI get their replay too?

jaffka · Post by **jaffka** » Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:12 pm

I think that is quite fair (I like Bruno!).

bobo the clown · Post by **bobo the clown** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:08 pm

Hobinho wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:On reflection Bruno's ban will not be permanent. It will be for one month and it will expire on 21 December. Any further ban will indeed be permanent. Hopefully he will accept this opportunity. There won't be any more.
Sh*t he's coming back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Have I called him anywhere??????????????????????????

Oh B*gger it, you cannot be serious in overturning this ban!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You lefties, liberal, mods you!!

I'd agree with the new decision if he hadn't had several warnings, at least one months ban & then a final ban in his guise as Batman .... and then when he returned using another name he had a months ban prior to this one.

Add to that the number of barely used new names which joined 6 months or so ago which have started using the site again since last weekend.

Still, the mods are the mods & put in a lot of effort, so I'll always respect even their incorrect decisions.

He'll blow it again. It's in his blood I'm afraid.

Gary the Enfield · Post by **Gary the Enfield** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:36 pm

If you ask me it's a bit of a RIM do all round!

Lord Kangana · Post by **Lord Kangana** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:43 pm

You can talk, Gary-two-profiles.

Gary the Enfield · Post by **Gary the Enfield** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:46 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:You can talk, Gary-two-profiles.

SSHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

Puskas · Post by **Puskas** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:50 pm

Gary The Beaver wrote:If you ask me it's a bit of a RIM do all round!

You're just over-analysing it.

Gary the Enfield · Post by **Gary the Enfield** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:52 pm

Puskas wrote:
Gary The Beaver wrote:If you ask me it's a bit of a RIM do all round!
You're just over-analysing it.

Hard probing is the only way!

Puskas · Post by **Puskas** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:55 pm

Gary The Beaver wrote:
Puskas wrote:
Gary The Beaver wrote:If you ask me it's a bit of a RIM do all round!
You're just over-analysing it.
Hard probing is the only way!

Maybe - but I think he's wrecked all chances of making a comeback....

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:55 pm

bobo the clown wrote:
Hobinho wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:On reflection Bruno's ban will not be permanent. It will be for one month and it will expire on 21 December. Any further ban will indeed be permanent. Hopefully he will accept this opportunity. There won't be any more.
Sh*t he's coming back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Have I called him anywhere??????????????????????????

Oh B*gger it, you cannot be serious in overturning this ban!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You lefties, liberal, mods you!!
I'd agree with the new decision if he hadn't had several warnings, at least one months ban & then a final ban in his guise as Batman .... and then when he returned using another name he had a months ban prior to this one.

Add to that the number of barely used new names which joined 6 months or so ago which have started using the site again since last weekend.

Still, the mods are the mods & put in a lot of effort, so I'll always respect even their incorrect decisions.

He'll blow it again. It's in his blood I'm afraid.

There does appear to be some correlation between some bans and new members joining/old accounts becoming reactivated apace. Maybe it's just my perception.

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:43 pm

I missed the offending article (since I haven't dared on since the Rovers game until today). Whatever the mods decide is fine with me though I'm glad that I did miss it - following the 0-2 it would have been too much for my elderly constitution.

Dave Sutton's barnet · Post by **Dave Sutton's barnet** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:35 pm

FWIW My sudden reappearance isn't anything to do with Bruno's absence, about which I'm only just discovering. Similarly, my disappearance didn't have owt to do with his posts. Merely being busy.

As usual, I stand by the mods' decision. They do their best at a job which may actually be impossible.

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:49 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:FWIW My sudden reappearance isn't anything to do with Bruno's absence, about which I'm only just discovering. Similarly, my disappearance didn't have owt to do with his posts. Merely being busy.

As usual, I stand by the mods' decision. They do their best at a job which may actually be impossible.

So you say, but we have our suspicions...

Hoboh · Post by **Hoboh** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:00 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:FWIW My sudden reappearance isn't anything to do with Bruno's absence, about which I'm only just discovering. Similarly, my disappearance didn't have owt to do with his posts. Merely being busy.

As usual, I stand by the mods' decision. They do their best at a job which may actually be impossible.
So you say, but we have our suspicions...

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

mofgimmers · Post by **mofgimmers** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:41 pm

What's really irritating is that some users want to take the piss with a forum they've done nothing to help run. It's like trying to kick the breeze keeping the balance right so everyone is welcome, new and old. People misbehave, get a warning, misbehave some more and then effectively ask for a refund on something that didn't cost 'em anything in the first place.

It's a good job I don't run this forum or I would've just closed it down as it's too much of a headache trying to stop the rampant gobshites.

LILYCOOL · Post by **LILYCOOL** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:16 am

come on,guys

LILYCOOL · Post by **LILYCOOL** » Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:10 am

Do we

come on

hohoho

Who is online

Connect with your social network account

Do we

come on

hohoho

Who is online