Sir Nut's ban

[seanworth]

The way the mods run this site determines the overall atmosphere on this site. The atmosphere is a long term deal, as certainly problems arise from time to time. Overall I like this site which is why I have stayed on. This is largely down to the way the mods run the site. Ideally the people that didn't like the Nutter should have simply ignored him. Over time he would have changed or simply moved on because it was clear from his posts he was looking for reactions. People didn't ignore though so the mods made a decision they deemed best for the site. Now it is up to Nut.

[boltonboris]

So he's got a month ban, because you don't like him? If he's killing the site as much as people say surely a full time ban is the best option. Otherwise don't ban him at all... From what I saw of his posts, never once was he abusive towards any other members of this board, despite people often referring to him as a c*nt, tw*t, Pr*ck, W*anker... Need I go on?

If his 'one trick' was to slag off Megson, he'd still be posting

But, I don't think it's fair to publicly question the modding

If folk don't like modding policy, there's other sites

I was just asking what the difference is between 8000+ posters being abusive and then Sir Nut being annoying.. Other than being 'liked'

[Lofthouse Lower]

So he's got a month ban, because you don't like him? If he's killing the site as much as people say surely a full time ban is the best option. Otherwise don't ban him at all... From what I saw of his posts, never once was he abusive towards any other members of this board, despite people often referring to him as a c*nt, tw*t, Pr*ck, W*anker... Need I go on?

If his 'one trick' was to slag off Megson, he'd still be posting

But, I don't think it's fair to publicly question the modding

If folk don't like modding policy, there's other sites

I was just asking what the difference is between 8000+ posters being abusive and then Sir Nut being annoying.. Other than being 'liked'

I think perhaps if your face fits then a blind eye is turned, whereas if it doesn't then it isn't.

[thebish]

you also asked if you needed to go on - the answer was "no" - it still is.

the mods have made a decision - this forum is not a democracy - it generally runs quite well because the mods act in the interests of the forum as a whole.

[thebish]

So he's got a month ban, because you don't like him? If he's killing the site as much as people say surely a full time ban is the best option. Otherwise don't ban him at all... From what I saw of his posts, never once was he abusive towards any other members of this board, despite people often referring to him as a c*nt, tw*t, Pr*ck, W*anker... Need I go on?

If his 'one trick' was to slag off Megson, he'd still be posting

But, I don't think it's fair to publicly question the modding

If folk don't like modding policy, there's other sites

I was just asking what the difference is between 8000+ posters being abusive and then Sir Nut being annoying.. Other than being 'liked'

I think perhaps if your face fits then a blind eye is turned, whereas if it doesn't then it isn't.

how on earth would you know - you've only been here 17days....

[Montreal Wanderer]

I think perhaps if your face fits then a blind eye is turned, whereas if it doesn't then it isn't.

how on earth would you know - you've only been here 17days....

Alfred told him?

[Lord Kangana]

One things for sure, I bet he's masturbating furiously over all the attention he's getting.

Theres the money shot for you Nut.

[Worthy4England]

So he's got a month ban, because you don't like him? If he's killing the site as much as people say surely a full time ban is the best option. Otherwise don't ban him at all... From what I saw of his posts, never once was he abusive towards any other members of this board, despite people often referring to him as a c*nt, tw*t, Pr*ck, W*anker... Need I go on?

If his 'one trick' was to slag off Megson, he'd still be posting

But, I don't think it's fair to publicly question the modding

If folk don't like modding policy, there's other sites

I was just asking what the difference is between 8000+ posters being abusive and then Sir Nut being annoying.. Other than being 'liked'

I'm filling up here. Stop it. Who will save Tiny Tim for Christmas?

[Lofthouse Lower]

So he's got a month ban, because you don't like him? If he's killing the site as much as people say surely a full time ban is the best option. Otherwise don't ban him at all... From what I saw of his posts, never once was he abusive towards any other members of this board, despite people often referring to him as a c*nt, tw*t, Pr*ck, W*anker... Need I go on?

If his 'one trick' was to slag off Megson, he'd still be posting

But, I don't think it's fair to publicly question the modding

If folk don't like modding policy, there's other sites

I was just asking what the difference is between 8000+ posters being abusive and then Sir Nut being annoying.. Other than being 'liked'

I think perhaps if your face fits then a blind eye is turned, whereas if it doesn't then it isn't.

how on earth would you know - you've only been here 17days....

I'm a long-time lurker bish, despite your finest conspiracy theories.

[thebish]

long time lurker to 12 posts a day.... it's a miracle story to warm the heart...

how I overcame my internet shyness in 17 days...

[Wandering Willy]

you also asked if you needed to go on - the answer was "no" - it still is.

the mods have made a decision - this forum is not a democracy - it generally runs quite well because the mods act in the interests of the forum as a whole.

This is true, though I suspect that were it a democracy the outcome would have been similar.

[TANGODANCER]

you also asked if you needed to go on - the answer was "no" - it still is.

the mods have made a decision - this forum is not a democracy - it generally runs quite well because the mods act in the interests of the forum as a whole.

This is true, though I suspect that were it a democracy the outcome would have been similar.

If it ever graduates to anarchy it'll probably close down. Sir Nut got a ban (half over now) not a life sentence in jail.

[Lofthouse Lower]

I'd give odds firmly against him returning.

[TANGODANCER]

I'd give odds firmly against him returning.

Seeing how you know him, I'll pass on that one.

[Lofthouse Lower]

I'd give odds firmly against him returning.

Seeing how you know him, I'll pass on that one.

That was my point, friend.

[thebish]

I'd give odds firmly against him returning.

if s/he wants to s/he will, if s/he doesn't want to s/he won't - and I doubt anyone will lose very much sleep between now and then laying bets...

[Hoboh]

I know! If you're going to absorb the same shite being spouted time and time and time again, about the same subject time and time and time again, with no right of meaningful reply, I might as well absorb it from someone who shares a bed with me!

mmmm I'd better leave Megson alone then!!! You reading too Lord K?

[Lord Kangana]

And give up the guaranteed replies? Don't spoil my fun trampman.

[mummywhycantieatcrayons]

So he's got a month ban, because you don't like him? If he's killing the site as much as people say surely a full time ban is the best option. Otherwise don't ban him at all... From what I saw of his posts, never once was he abusive towards any other members of this board, despite people often referring to him as a c*nt, tw*t, Pr*ck, W*anker... Need I go on?

If his 'one trick' was to slag off Megson, he'd still be posting

But, I don't think it's fair to publicly question the modding

If folk don't like modding policy, there's other sites

I was just asking what the difference is between 8000+ posters being abusive and then Sir Nut being annoying.. Other than being 'liked'

I think perhaps if your face fits then a blind eye is turned, whereas if it doesn't then it isn't.

Face?

Am I missing something?

[Montreal Wanderer]

So he's got a month ban, because you don't like him? If he's killing the site as much as people say surely a full time ban is the best option. Otherwise don't ban him at all... From what I saw of his posts, never once was he abusive towards any other members of this board, despite people often referring to him as a c*nt, tw*t, Pr*ck, W*anker... Need I go on?

If his 'one trick' was to slag off Megson, he'd still be posting

But, I don't think it's fair to publicly question the modding

If folk don't like modding policy, there's other sites

I was just asking what the difference is between 8000+ posters being abusive and then Sir Nut being annoying.. Other than being 'liked'

I think perhaps if your face fits then a blind eye is turned, whereas if it doesn't then it isn't.

Face?

Am I missing something?

It wouldn't surprise me, PB But then I am too