West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Bench
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:18 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by Bench » Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:56 pm

whufc2007 wrote:
thebish wrote:
West Ham Matt wrote:I live in a nice part of East London, by Tower Bridge :mrgreen:

Anyway, I understand that when we were on our to being relegated the media were plugging for us - but why not? We have offered a lot more to English football in recent years than you have (half the England team to be precise) - of course people wanted us to stay up. We used to play good football and be an entertaining team to watch, which is why West Ham, believe it or not, are a lot of peoples second team.

You should be aiming your angst at the media.
Yes - you're right - aiming our angst at the meeja - except that the West-Ham loving meeja tosspots are most annoyed/irritated when West Ham get relegated - so the best way to bash them is to wish West Ham ill-fortune - which is to bash you!!

(
whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.

What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?

We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
That last bit makes the most sense. But surely its 'cant'? :mrgreen:
Smarties have answers.....

James B
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1439
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:50 pm

Post by James B » Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:56 pm

whufc2007 wrote:Lets keep this conversation football related
do you really want that? :shock:

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Post by CrazyHorse » Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:57 pm

whufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.

What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?

We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
:conf:
You have an inferiority complex, don't you?
Businesswoman of the year.

Bench
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:18 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by Bench » Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:57 pm

As for big crowds.....don't Sunderland have bigger support?

You see....the size of your crowd means feck all.
Smarties have answers.....

whufc2007
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:14 pm

Post by whufc2007 » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:00 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:
whufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.

What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?

We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
:conf:
You have an inferiority complex, don't you?
nope, next

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:01 pm

Still here?
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Post by CrazyHorse » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:01 pm

whufc2007 wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:
whufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.

What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?

We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
:conf:
You have an inferiority complex, don't you?
nope, next
:conf:
You're deluded?
Businesswoman of the year.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:03 pm

I give you this cant

Fat?

Sad?

Too right he is

Image

And check this out

They make me piss

http://www.lalamy.demon.co.uk/whufans.htm

Never seen such a collection of second rate wannabees

Ferks sake, even our drums seem a little bit better now
Sto ut Serviam

whufc2007
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:14 pm

Post by whufc2007 » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:06 pm

Bench wrote:As for big crowds.....don't Sunderland have bigger support?

You see....the size of your crowd means feck all.
it means something when your talking about loyalty especially in regards to West Ham. The point being that we take the good times with the bad, regardless of what it is we always put out a good support.

Which is the mirror image of teams that are performing well yet cannot get fans to come and watch them and result to corny (sp) american rubbish to get the crowd going, and with this I include Blackburn and Wigan.

And in reference to Sunderland - well I have the utmost of respect for them (or respec' if one of the idiots on here wants to continue to have a pop about me living in London), they were one of the best supports home and away I witnessed last season

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:07 pm

whufc2007 wrote: whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.

What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?

We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
y'see that's a great post - and just what this site is supposed to be about - it's why we're not on Rivals!!

I don't fully agree though...

Every time I have heard commentary on WH - they are described by the meeja as a "footballing team" - and every time I hear commentary on Bolton we are described as a "physical team"

I don't think that's true at all.. unless the definition of "footballing" has changed.

you are right if you say WH have changed (in that they are now simply rubbish) - but I don't think the Meeja view has changed a jot - you don't have to look much beyond the BBC hero-worship of Sir Trevor Brooking to see that...

anyway - as far as I'm concerned - you're most welcome on here - you have some humility and wit and patience under fire..

Gord Bless you mate!

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31644
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:07 pm

whufc2007 wrote:
thebish wrote:
West Ham Matt wrote:I live in a nice part of East London, by Tower Bridge :mrgreen:

Anyway, I understand that when we were on our to being relegated the media were plugging for us - but why not? We have offered a lot more to English football in recent years than you have (half the England team to be precise) - of course people wanted us to stay up. We used to play good football and be an entertaining team to watch, which is why West Ham, believe it or not, are a lot of peoples second team.

You should be aiming your angst at the media.
Yes - you're right - aiming our angst at the meeja - except that the West-Ham loving meeja tosspots are most annoyed/irritated when West Ham get relegated - so the best way to bash them is to wish West Ham ill-fortune - which is to bash you!!
whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.

What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?

We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
I'm growing to like you, sir. Even if you cheat by living in Tower Bridge, nowhere dear the desolate badlands your team plays in :wink:

Your team STILL gets a lot more media coverage than comparable teams from elsewhere. So you've had a season in the Prem and reached a cup final; I don't recall Blackburn receiving such attention a few years ago when they did much the same, or even Boro when they reached a European final. You simply cannot deny that on a quantitative and qualitative scale West Ham get more coverage than they, er, deserve. Now, of late this has turned from last season's "ballsy newcomers" (as opposed to, say, the patronisation of Wigan as "plucky little 'uns") into intrigue about the Argentinian hire-no-purchases into constant banging on about Eggert Bloody Eggheadsen. Now I can sympathise with you that the attention is all on this peculiar little glove-puppet of a convicted fraudster - I lost count of the number of times we saw him slumping into his Madejski seat, although you chaps may have preferred it to the action on the pitch...

Here's an obvious newsflash: Bolton fans have chips on their shoulders. This season's slow-motion car-crash aside, you probably imagine that West Ham have been favourably viewed by football fans as a whole. Now imagine flipping that on its head. Imagine a media which often seems to be setting out to systematically destroy your image, which focuses on the long-balls we used to play three years ago and the long throws we haven't scored off for a season and a half, which harps on about foreigners while applauding Arsenal's League Of Nations ("no Englanders allowed!"), which analyses every time Diouf crumbles under assault while forgiving cheeky winker Ronaldo, which spends a year preparing an hour of prime-time "investigative" TV on utterly unfounded hearsay and entrapment ("Mr Unknown Agent, if we offer to give you £10,000 funding will you spout random names?") . Imagine that for a wee while.


EDIT: Apologies, it's West Ham Matt who lives in Tower Bridge. Continue...
Last edited by Dave Sutton's barnet on Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

whufc2007
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:14 pm

Post by whufc2007 » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:09 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:I give you this cant

Fat?

Sad?

Too right he is

Image

And check this out

They make me piss

http://www.lalamy.demon.co.uk/whufans.htm

Never seen such a collection of second rate wannabees

Ferks sake, even our drums seem a little bit better now
might want to get yourself checked out mate

Bench
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:18 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by Bench » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:11 pm

whufc2007 wrote:
Bench wrote:As for big crowds.....don't Sunderland have bigger support?

You see....the size of your crowd means feck all.
it means something when your talking about loyalty especially in regards to West Ham. The point being that we take the good times with the bad, regardless of what it is we always put out a good support.

Which is the mirror image of teams that are performing well yet cannot get fans to come and watch them and result to corny (sp) american rubbish to get the crowd going, and with this I include Blackburn and Wigan.

And in reference to Sunderland - well I have the utmost of respect for them (or respec' if one of the idiots on here wants to continue to have a pop about me living in London), they were one of the best supports home and away I witnessed last season
Another good post sir.

And as for loyalty, although our support is a tad down this season (along with the majority of Clubs in the top flight), our home crowd has largely remained static for the last few years. If we were to get relegated, I doubt it would drop too much. But that into the perspective of our catchment area and conurbation against our close rivals (United, Citeh, Liverpool, Blackburn, Wigan, Everton etc etc) against that of West Ham's - and I don't think we do too badly overall.
Smarties have answers.....

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Post by CrazyHorse » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:12 pm

whufc2007 wrote:it means something when your talking about loyalty especially in regards to West Ham. The point being that we take the good times with the bad, regardless of what it is we always put out a good support.
That's what Manchester City used to say when they were in the 2nd Division. We all laughed at them then too.

Seriously, who gives a fook about crowd attendances and loyalty? As long as I support Bolton I couldn't care less who else does or doesn't.

We're an easy set of fans to wind up mate if you try a little harder, but you're way off the mark with this one.

Now, would you care to join me for some nice jellied eels?
Businesswoman of the year.

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9405
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Post by Harry Genshaw » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:13 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: Here's an obvious newsflash: Bolton fans have chips on their shoulders. This season's slow-motion car-crash aside, you probably imagine that West Ham have been favourably viewed by football fans as a whole. Now imagine flipping that on its head. Imagine a media which often seems to be setting out to systematically destroy your image, which focuses on the long-balls we used to play three years ago and the long throws we haven't scored off for a season and a half, which harps on about foreigners while applauding Arsenal's League Of Nations ("no Englanders allowed!"), which analyses every time Diouf crumbles under assault while forgiving cheeky winker Ronaldo, which spends a year preparing an hour of prime-time "investigative" TV on utterly unfounded hearsay and entrapment ("Mr Unknown Agent, if we offer to give you £10,000 funding will you spout random names?") . Imagine that for a wee while.


EDIT: Apologies, it's West Ham Matt who lives in Tower Bridge. Continue...
:pray: DSB - Thats one of the best and most accurate pieces of writing Ive seen anywhere on BWFC. Amazing that someone linked with the name Dave Sutton can produce something so beautiful - sniff.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:14 pm

west ham matt...

you simply cannot claim to have provided half the england team. for feck's sake you are a SELLING CLUB and always will. How many of the current team are actually at your club?

NONE, the same as little Bowton

They are too big for you, so they move on. Even Glenn Johnston who is only just in Portsmouth's back line had to move on from you. Anton wants to. Nigel wants to. You sold the best players for a reason

Athers
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Manchester

Post by Athers » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:16 pm

I've lived in West Ham territory for nearly 6 months, it aint half miserable round here at the moment, and I'm not just talking about the crime rate..
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

whufc2007
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:14 pm

Post by whufc2007 » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:17 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
whufc2007 wrote:
thebish wrote:
West Ham Matt wrote:I live in a nice part of East London, by Tower Bridge :mrgreen:

Anyway, I understand that when we were on our to being relegated the media were plugging for us - but why not? We have offered a lot more to English football in recent years than you have (half the England team to be precise) - of course people wanted us to stay up. We used to play good football and be an entertaining team to watch, which is why West Ham, believe it or not, are a lot of peoples second team.

You should be aiming your angst at the media.
Yes - you're right - aiming our angst at the meeja - except that the West-Ham loving meeja tosspots are most annoyed/irritated when West Ham get relegated - so the best way to bash them is to wish West Ham ill-fortune - which is to bash you!!
whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.

What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?

We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
I'm growing to like you, sir. Even if you cheat by living in Tower Bridge, nowhere dear the desolate badlands your team plays in :wink:

Your team STILL gets a lot more media coverage than comparable teams from elsewhere. So you've had a season in the Prem and reached a cup final; I don't recall Blackburn receiving such attention a few years ago when they did much the same, or even Boro when they reached a European final. You simply cannot deny that on a quantitative and qualitative scale West Ham get more coverage than they, er, deserve. Now, of late this has turned from last season's "ballsy newcomers" (as opposed to, say, the patronisation of Wigan as "plucky little 'uns") into intrigue about the Argentinian hire-no-purchases into constant banging on about Eggert Bloody Eggheadsen. Now I can sympathise with you that the attention is all on this peculiar little glove-puppet of a convicted fraudster - I lost count of the number of times we saw him slumping into his Madejski seat, although you chaps may have preferred it to the action on the pitch...

Here's an obvious newsflash: Bolton fans have chips on their shoulders. This season's slow-motion car-crash aside, you probably imagine that West Ham have been favourably viewed by football fans as a whole. Now imagine flipping that on its head. Imagine a media which often seems to be setting out to systematically destroy your image, which focuses on the long-balls we used to play three years ago and the long throws we haven't scored off for a season and a half, which harps on about foreigners while applauding Arsenal's League Of Nations ("no Englanders allowed!"), which analyses every time Diouf crumbles under assault while forgiving cheeky winker Ronaldo, which spends a year preparing an hour of prime-time "investigative" TV on utterly unfounded hearsay and entrapment ("Mr Unknown Agent, if we offer to give you £10,000 funding will you spout random names?") . Imagine that for a wee while.


EDIT: Apologies, it's West Ham Matt who lives in Tower Bridge. Continue...
good points, might be due to the bias towards London clubs as apposed to it being a West Ham thing, with the majority of fleet street hacks being London people.

The other issue at that time was that West Ham were known as a good passing side and Bolton were known as the opposite, ive got to say though that after the shit ive had to watch this year, your lot passed us out of the game where our desperation and lack of players who go looking for the ball have resulted in us pumping the ball 40 yards to noone, and what makes it worse is that we havent got any "bolton" type players to get the foot in

whufc2007
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:14 pm

Post by whufc2007 » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:20 pm

Athers wrote:I've lived in West Ham territory for nearly 6 months, it aint half miserable round here at the moment, and I'm not just talking about the crime rate..
i think most of us have been through every emotion this season, at them moment we are in the dispair / anger stage

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:22 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:west ham matt...

you simply cannot claim to have provided half the england team. for feck's sake you are a SELLING CLUB and always will. How many of the current team are actually at your club?

NONE, the same as little Bowton

They are too big for you, so they move on. Even Glenn Johnston who is only just in Portsmouth's back line had to move on from you. Anton wants to. Nigel wants to. You sold the best players for a reason
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 230031.stm

right on cue, here's another

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests