West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:18 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
That last bit makes the most sense. But surely its 'cant'?whufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.thebish wrote:Yes - you're right - aiming our angst at the meeja - except that the West-Ham loving meeja tosspots are most annoyed/irritated when West Ham get relegated - so the best way to bash them is to wish West Ham ill-fortune - which is to bash you!!West Ham Matt wrote:I live in a nice part of East London, by Tower Bridge![]()
Anyway, I understand that when we were on our to being relegated the media were plugging for us - but why not? We have offered a lot more to English football in recent years than you have (half the England team to be precise) - of course people wanted us to stay up. We used to play good football and be an entertaining team to watch, which is why West Ham, believe it or not, are a lot of peoples second team.
You should be aiming your angst at the media.
(
What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?
We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)

Smarties have answers.....
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
whufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.
What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?
We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)

You have an inferiority complex, don't you?
Businesswoman of the year.
nope, nextCrazyHorse wrote:whufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.
What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?
We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
You have an inferiority complex, don't you?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
whufc2007 wrote:nope, nextCrazyHorse wrote:whufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.
What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?
We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
You have an inferiority complex, don't you?

You're deluded?
Businesswoman of the year.
I give you this cant
Fat?
Sad?
Too right he is

And check this out
They make me piss
http://www.lalamy.demon.co.uk/whufans.htm
Never seen such a collection of second rate wannabees
Ferks sake, even our drums seem a little bit better now
Fat?
Sad?
Too right he is

And check this out
They make me piss
http://www.lalamy.demon.co.uk/whufans.htm
Never seen such a collection of second rate wannabees
Ferks sake, even our drums seem a little bit better now
Sto ut Serviam
it means something when your talking about loyalty especially in regards to West Ham. The point being that we take the good times with the bad, regardless of what it is we always put out a good support.Bench wrote:As for big crowds.....don't Sunderland have bigger support?
You see....the size of your crowd means feck all.
Which is the mirror image of teams that are performing well yet cannot get fans to come and watch them and result to corny (sp) american rubbish to get the crowd going, and with this I include Blackburn and Wigan.
And in reference to Sunderland - well I have the utmost of respect for them (or respec' if one of the idiots on here wants to continue to have a pop about me living in London), they were one of the best supports home and away I witnessed last season
y'see that's a great post - and just what this site is supposed to be about - it's why we're not on Rivals!!whufc2007 wrote: whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.
What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?
We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)
I don't fully agree though...
Every time I have heard commentary on WH - they are described by the meeja as a "footballing team" - and every time I hear commentary on Bolton we are described as a "physical team"
I don't think that's true at all.. unless the definition of "footballing" has changed.
you are right if you say WH have changed (in that they are now simply rubbish) - but I don't think the Meeja view has changed a jot - you don't have to look much beyond the BBC hero-worship of Sir Trevor Brooking to see that...
anyway - as far as I'm concerned - you're most welcome on here - you have some humility and wit and patience under fire..
Gord Bless you mate!
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31644
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
I'm growing to like you, sir. Even if you cheat by living in Tower Bridge, nowhere dear the desolate badlands your team plays inwhufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.thebish wrote:Yes - you're right - aiming our angst at the meeja - except that the West-Ham loving meeja tosspots are most annoyed/irritated when West Ham get relegated - so the best way to bash them is to wish West Ham ill-fortune - which is to bash you!!West Ham Matt wrote:I live in a nice part of East London, by Tower Bridge![]()
Anyway, I understand that when we were on our to being relegated the media were plugging for us - but why not? We have offered a lot more to English football in recent years than you have (half the England team to be precise) - of course people wanted us to stay up. We used to play good football and be an entertaining team to watch, which is why West Ham, believe it or not, are a lot of peoples second team.
You should be aiming your angst at the media.
What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?
We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)

Your team STILL gets a lot more media coverage than comparable teams from elsewhere. So you've had a season in the Prem and reached a cup final; I don't recall Blackburn receiving such attention a few years ago when they did much the same, or even Boro when they reached a European final. You simply cannot deny that on a quantitative and qualitative scale West Ham get more coverage than they, er, deserve. Now, of late this has turned from last season's "ballsy newcomers" (as opposed to, say, the patronisation of Wigan as "plucky little 'uns") into intrigue about the Argentinian hire-no-purchases into constant banging on about Eggert Bloody Eggheadsen. Now I can sympathise with you that the attention is all on this peculiar little glove-puppet of a convicted fraudster - I lost count of the number of times we saw him slumping into his Madejski seat, although you chaps may have preferred it to the action on the pitch...
Here's an obvious newsflash: Bolton fans have chips on their shoulders. This season's slow-motion car-crash aside, you probably imagine that West Ham have been favourably viewed by football fans as a whole. Now imagine flipping that on its head. Imagine a media which often seems to be setting out to systematically destroy your image, which focuses on the long-balls we used to play three years ago and the long throws we haven't scored off for a season and a half, which harps on about foreigners while applauding Arsenal's League Of Nations ("no Englanders allowed!"), which analyses every time Diouf crumbles under assault while forgiving cheeky winker Ronaldo, which spends a year preparing an hour of prime-time "investigative" TV on utterly unfounded hearsay and entrapment ("Mr Unknown Agent, if we offer to give you £10,000 funding will you spout random names?") . Imagine that for a wee while.
EDIT: Apologies, it's West Ham Matt who lives in Tower Bridge. Continue...
Last edited by Dave Sutton's barnet on Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
might want to get yourself checked out mateCAPSLOCK wrote:I give you this cant
Fat?
Sad?
Too right he is
And check this out
They make me piss
http://www.lalamy.demon.co.uk/whufans.htm
Never seen such a collection of second rate wannabees
Ferks sake, even our drums seem a little bit better now
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:18 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
Another good post sir.whufc2007 wrote:it means something when your talking about loyalty especially in regards to West Ham. The point being that we take the good times with the bad, regardless of what it is we always put out a good support.Bench wrote:As for big crowds.....don't Sunderland have bigger support?
You see....the size of your crowd means feck all.
Which is the mirror image of teams that are performing well yet cannot get fans to come and watch them and result to corny (sp) american rubbish to get the crowd going, and with this I include Blackburn and Wigan.
And in reference to Sunderland - well I have the utmost of respect for them (or respec' if one of the idiots on here wants to continue to have a pop about me living in London), they were one of the best supports home and away I witnessed last season
And as for loyalty, although our support is a tad down this season (along with the majority of Clubs in the top flight), our home crowd has largely remained static for the last few years. If we were to get relegated, I doubt it would drop too much. But that into the perspective of our catchment area and conurbation against our close rivals (United, Citeh, Liverpool, Blackburn, Wigan, Everton etc etc) against that of West Ham's - and I don't think we do too badly overall.
Smarties have answers.....
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
That's what Manchester City used to say when they were in the 2nd Division. We all laughed at them then too.whufc2007 wrote:it means something when your talking about loyalty especially in regards to West Ham. The point being that we take the good times with the bad, regardless of what it is we always put out a good support.
Seriously, who gives a fook about crowd attendances and loyalty? As long as I support Bolton I couldn't care less who else does or doesn't.
We're an easy set of fans to wind up mate if you try a little harder, but you're way off the mark with this one.
Now, would you care to join me for some nice jellied eels?
Businesswoman of the year.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9405
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote: Here's an obvious newsflash: Bolton fans have chips on their shoulders. This season's slow-motion car-crash aside, you probably imagine that West Ham have been favourably viewed by football fans as a whole. Now imagine flipping that on its head. Imagine a media which often seems to be setting out to systematically destroy your image, which focuses on the long-balls we used to play three years ago and the long throws we haven't scored off for a season and a half, which harps on about foreigners while applauding Arsenal's League Of Nations ("no Englanders allowed!"), which analyses every time Diouf crumbles under assault while forgiving cheeky winker Ronaldo, which spends a year preparing an hour of prime-time "investigative" TV on utterly unfounded hearsay and entrapment ("Mr Unknown Agent, if we offer to give you £10,000 funding will you spout random names?") . Imagine that for a wee while.
EDIT: Apologies, it's West Ham Matt who lives in Tower Bridge. Continue...

"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
west ham matt...
you simply cannot claim to have provided half the england team. for feck's sake you are a SELLING CLUB and always will. How many of the current team are actually at your club?
NONE, the same as little Bowton
They are too big for you, so they move on. Even Glenn Johnston who is only just in Portsmouth's back line had to move on from you. Anton wants to. Nigel wants to. You sold the best players for a reason
you simply cannot claim to have provided half the england team. for feck's sake you are a SELLING CLUB and always will. How many of the current team are actually at your club?
NONE, the same as little Bowton
They are too big for you, so they move on. Even Glenn Johnston who is only just in Portsmouth's back line had to move on from you. Anton wants to. Nigel wants to. You sold the best players for a reason
I've lived in West Ham territory for nearly 6 months, it aint half miserable round here at the moment, and I'm not just talking about the crime rate..
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
good points, might be due to the bias towards London clubs as apposed to it being a West Ham thing, with the majority of fleet street hacks being London people.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I'm growing to like you, sir. Even if you cheat by living in Tower Bridge, nowhere dear the desolate badlands your team plays inwhufc2007 wrote:whilst you were probably right the last time we went down, I think you'll find that times have changed, we are far from the media darlings you describe, and rightly so.thebish wrote:Yes - you're right - aiming our angst at the meeja - except that the West-Ham loving meeja tosspots are most annoyed/irritated when West Ham get relegated - so the best way to bash them is to wish West Ham ill-fortune - which is to bash you!!West Ham Matt wrote:I live in a nice part of East London, by Tower Bridge![]()
Anyway, I understand that when we were on our to being relegated the media were plugging for us - but why not? We have offered a lot more to English football in recent years than you have (half the England team to be precise) - of course people wanted us to stay up. We used to play good football and be an entertaining team to watch, which is why West Ham, believe it or not, are a lot of peoples second team.
You should be aiming your angst at the media.
What interests me more is your hatred (seems to be on here), of a club with tradition and pride that has a loyal support base despite the shit that we are subjected to on a weekly basis?
We can sit here and sprout off bollocks about flat caps, pearly kings and queens, flat beer, shandy drinkers blah blah blah, but it's bollocks really. Lets keep this conversation football related and see if we can rid you of your irrational hatred (see it as a free councilling session with the word cnut thrown in a few times)![]()
Your team STILL gets a lot more media coverage than comparable teams from elsewhere. So you've had a season in the Prem and reached a cup final; I don't recall Blackburn receiving such attention a few years ago when they did much the same, or even Boro when they reached a European final. You simply cannot deny that on a quantitative and qualitative scale West Ham get more coverage than they, er, deserve. Now, of late this has turned from last season's "ballsy newcomers" (as opposed to, say, the patronisation of Wigan as "plucky little 'uns") into intrigue about the Argentinian hire-no-purchases into constant banging on about Eggert Bloody Eggheadsen. Now I can sympathise with you that the attention is all on this peculiar little glove-puppet of a convicted fraudster - I lost count of the number of times we saw him slumping into his Madejski seat, although you chaps may have preferred it to the action on the pitch...
Here's an obvious newsflash: Bolton fans have chips on their shoulders. This season's slow-motion car-crash aside, you probably imagine that West Ham have been favourably viewed by football fans as a whole. Now imagine flipping that on its head. Imagine a media which often seems to be setting out to systematically destroy your image, which focuses on the long-balls we used to play three years ago and the long throws we haven't scored off for a season and a half, which harps on about foreigners while applauding Arsenal's League Of Nations ("no Englanders allowed!"), which analyses every time Diouf crumbles under assault while forgiving cheeky winker Ronaldo, which spends a year preparing an hour of prime-time "investigative" TV on utterly unfounded hearsay and entrapment ("Mr Unknown Agent, if we offer to give you £10,000 funding will you spout random names?") . Imagine that for a wee while.
EDIT: Apologies, it's West Ham Matt who lives in Tower Bridge. Continue...
The other issue at that time was that West Ham were known as a good passing side and Bolton were known as the opposite, ive got to say though that after the shit ive had to watch this year, your lot passed us out of the game where our desperation and lack of players who go looking for the ball have resulted in us pumping the ball 40 yards to noone, and what makes it worse is that we havent got any "bolton" type players to get the foot in
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 230031.stmhisroyalgingerness wrote:west ham matt...
you simply cannot claim to have provided half the england team. for feck's sake you are a SELLING CLUB and always will. How many of the current team are actually at your club?
NONE, the same as little Bowton
They are too big for you, so they move on. Even Glenn Johnston who is only just in Portsmouth's back line had to move on from you. Anton wants to. Nigel wants to. You sold the best players for a reason
right on cue, here's another
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests