West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:20 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
fozzy wrote:
... is everything about Wet Sham bent ?

Frankly .... yes.

Quite an ironic statement, considering the recent Quest findings...
Er, the club was cleared of any misdemenours buddy. What Newcastle's manager and his son do are none of our concern.

did you just read the headline of the Star fozzy? tut tut, try discovering facts and making your own fecking tiny mind up

Dave Sutton's barnet · Post by **Dave Sutton's barnet** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:32 pm

You couldn't make it up. And if you did, you'd feel dirty.

fozzy · Post by **fozzy** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:27 pm

tut tut, try discovering facts and making your own fecking tiny mind up

Again, quite ironic coming from a Bolton supporter...and it's The Times for me.

CAPSLOCK · Post by **CAPSLOCK** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:45 pm

fozzy wrote:
tut tut, try discovering facts and making your own fecking tiny mind up
Again, quite ironic coming from a Bolton supporter...and it's The Times for me.

Good God, how deep are you trying to dig yourself?

fozzy · Post by **fozzy** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:23 am

The Sun a better option then?

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:07 am

fozzy wrote:The Sun a better option then?

fozzy - do yourself a favour. feck off back to Essex to your eel munching mates. You're all a bunch of cheating pikey tossers. No offence.

David Lee's Hair · Post by **David Lee's Hair** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:11 am

fozzy wrote:The Sun a better option then?

Same paper as The Times but uses less complex words

fozzy · Post by **fozzy** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:24 pm

Zulu - Nice. Noticed any abuse from me? Nope.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:47 pm

fozzy wrote:Zulu - Nice. Noticed any abuse from me? Nope.

No offence taken then. Good!

James B · Post by **James B** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:05 pm

fozzy wrote:Zulu - Nice. Noticed any abuse from me? Nope.

fozzy wrote:
tut tut, try discovering facts and making your own fecking tiny mind up
Again, quite ironic coming from a Bolton supporter...

that qualifies

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:33 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:
fozzy wrote:The Sun a better option then?
fozzy - do yourself a favour. feck off back to Essex to your eel munching mates. You're all a bunch of cheating pikey tossers. No offence.

Hmm. Based on what Sotwa told SH and Cowdrill about abuse, poor Zulu can expect a stiff pm from ... er ... who was it? I forget.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:24 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:
fozzy wrote:The Sun a better option then?
fozzy - do yourself a favour. feck off back to Essex to your eel munching mates. You're all a bunch of cheating pikey tossers. No offence.
Hmm. Based on what Sotwa told SH and Cowdrill about abuse, poor Zulu can expect a stiff pm from ... er ... who was it? I forget.

I'm writing to myself immediately. My reply will plead mitigating circumstances i.e. Pearly queen provocation. Sorry!

Hoboh · Post by **Hoboh** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:35 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:
fozzy wrote:The Sun a better option then?
fozzy - do yourself a favour. feck off back to Essex to your eel munching mates. You're all a bunch of cheating pikey tossers. No offence.
Hmm. Based on what Sotwa told SH and Cowdrill about abuse, poor Zulu can expect a stiff pm from ... er ... who was it? I forget.

Ah but surely thats to other Bolton fans is it not? We cannot really be expected to be nice to other clubs or their supporters can we

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:37 pm

plus, it was an accurate description

Bench · Post by **Bench** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:42 pm

communistworkethic wrote:plus, it was an accurate description

Facts. There's no way of getting away from 'em.

CrazyHorse · Post by **CrazyHorse** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:07 pm

I'm confused here.
Is it or is it not acceptable on this site to call West Ham fans a bunch of cheating pikey tossers?

superjohnmcginlay · Post by **superjohnmcginlay** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:08 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:I'm confused here.
Is it or is it not acceptable on this site to call West Ham fans a bunch of cheating pikey tossers?

Its compulsory.

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:11 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:I'm confused here.
Is it or is it not acceptable on this site to call West Ham fans a bunch of cheating pikey tossers?

So many questions! So few answers! Thank goodness we have mods who know instinctively what the right thing to do is. Otherwise anarchy would reign and we would have to be nice to blurred (I may not have got that right - oh well).

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:20 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:I'm confused here.
Is it or is it not acceptable on this site to call West Ham fans a bunch of cheating pikey tossers?

yes, as it's not abuse but a true representation of west ham fans, therefore it's not abuse. If you referred to the prawn sandwich gobbling johnny-cum-latelys of Man Ure as"cheating pikey tossers", you'd be saying they're west hams fans essentially, which is clearly abuse.

warthog · Post by **warthog** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:26 pm

Opinions on the Yossi.

http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=90266

Made me laugh.

Connect with your social network account

West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Who is online