Sunderland will be top of the league before you kick off.

Nozza · Post by **Nozza** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:54 pm

Daxter wrote:
Nozza wrote:
Daxter wrote:
James B wrote:
Daxter wrote:The spuds will decimate you.
a team that are notoriously weak on the road infront of a full house of mackems back in the big time with fresh optimism?

not at all clear cut.
Totally, I just think the mackems are a little bit too optimistic and might end up having their hearts sunk.
What exactly are you basing this on?
You, and the Sunderland fans I hear on the radio.

My "optimism" is nothing more than playful exuberance, I fear the worst for SAFC, as I always do. We'll be fighting relegation. Without doubt.

The fans you hear on the radio probably believe we are going to sign Scholes, Forlan and Van Nistelrooy and on the whole, are a very small majority of fans.

The level headed amongst us know that our last 2 (3) Premiership seasons show us to be a poor side, and deservedly so. We'll get hammered against Spurs. We're notoriously slow starters (and finishers before any cheeky kernt says anything)

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:25 pm

The middle is shit as well.

laydeeAmz · Post by **laydeeAmz** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:42 am

why would a sunderland fan cum on this forum?

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:46 am

laydeeAmz wrote:why would a sunderland fan cum on this forum?

none of the other sunderland fans have computers or electricity for that matter, so he's the only one on the interweb, so we let him come on here. It's like care in the community, we even have a tame Liverpool fan.

laydeeAmz · Post by **laydeeAmz** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:47 am

communistworkethic wrote:
laydeeAmz wrote:why would a sunderland fan cum on this forum?
none of the other sunderland fans have computers or electricity for that matter, so he's the only one on the interweb, so we let him come on here. It's like care in the community, we even have a tame Liverpool fan.

funny sunderland n liverpool r lyk my 2nd teams after bolton.

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:48 am

my head hurts

laydeeAmz · Post by **laydeeAmz** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:49 am

communistworkethic wrote:my head hurts

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:30 am

Care to explain why they are your second team?
Oh and pleeeeeeeease stop the text speak

laydeeAmz · Post by **laydeeAmz** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:31 am

Batman wrote:Care to explain why they are your second team?
Oh and pleeeeeeeease stop the text speak

well liverpool cos ov gerrard n sunderland cos my ex woz a fan.

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:32 am

As good a reason as any I suppose.

Dujon · Post by **Dujon** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:43 am

Hello, ladyAmz,

If you continue to use the dreaded text-speak on this forum you will undoubtedly be lambasted day in and day out. Most contributors to these fora are reasonably sane people but, by the same token, most contributors tend to see red when confronted with such gobbledegook. I politely ask that you refrain from using it. Ta.

Other than that, welcome aboard. I look forward to reading your sensibly typed input.

As for you, Nozza, I don't really care where you finish provided that it's below us. Good luck.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:49 am

Spot on!

communistworkethic · Post by **communistworkethic** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:50 am

Dujon wrote:Hello, ladyAmz,

If you continue to use the dreaded text-speak on this forum you will undoubtedly be lambasted day in and day out. Most contributors to these fora are reasonably sane people but, by the same token, most contributors tend to see red when confronted with such gobbledegook. I politely ask that you refrain from using it. Ta.

Other than that, welcome aboard. I look forward to reading your sensibly typed input.

or

Hi Ladyamz

if u uze txtspk pstrs on ere get rite pssd off wit u and u will get tons ov sht ov thm. Most ppls is ok but u neds 2 rite propr 4 thm. plz dnt uze it, ok?

but, lolz, welcum, ize lukin 4wrd to cing ur psts in prper spk.

Backgammon · Post by **Backgammon** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:16 am

I just cant see Sunderland having a chance this season really... Soo many teams have improved their squads over the summer. Even last year's poor teams are looking a hell of a lot stronger (Newcastle, Fulham etc).

It might be another bad one...

Nozza · Post by **Nozza** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:30 am

I reckon we'll finish bottom, with 11 points. Keane will be sacked by Christmas, but we will win the FA Cup and League Cup. And then do a Leeds.

Which lets face it, most people seem to want...

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:48 am

Not true, Nozza. There's many on here who would much rather see West Ham, Newcastle United and Manchester City finish below you (to name but three!)

Backgammon · Post by **Backgammon** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:53 am

Nozza wrote:Which lets face it, most people seem to want...

I don't really care. All I want is for Sunderland to finish below Bolton.

Worthy4England · Post by **Worthy4England** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:00 am

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:Not true, Nozza. There's many on here who would much rather see West Ham, Newcastle United and Manchester City finish below you (to name but three!)

personally I'd like to see Everton suffer too....I seem to remember being relegated on goal difference once over when they scored a late goal to rescue their sorry asses.

dodgykipper · Post by **dodgykipper** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:15 am

Worthy4England wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:Not true, Nozza. There's many on here who would much rather see West Ham, Newcastle United and Manchester City finish below you (to name but three!)

personally I'd like to see Everton suffer too....I seem to remember being relegated on goal difference once over when they scored a late goal to rescue their sorry asses.

It would give me so much joy to see Everton go down. I can see Kenright's miserable face right now. Rather them than Man City, who at least are not United.

Nozza · Post by **Nozza** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:57 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:Not true, Nozza. There's many on here who would much rather see West Ham, Newcastle United and Manchester City finish below you (to name but three!)

It was aimed at the general public, rather than this board in specific.

New West Ham, us. Gerrin.

Connect with your social network account

Sunderland will be top of the league before you kick off.

Who is online