Benitez .... prick

Abdoulaye's Twin · Post by **Abdoulaye's Twin** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:22 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:The constructive dismissal idea was apparently floated in a few papers this morning, which may be why I received an email from a motormouth lawyer who's always trying to get his face in the media on football law
Then the motor-mouth lawyer is an idiot.

I do this for a living & could claim 1,000's of Liver Birds on the side of my Spitfire (plus a good few hundred Smoggies & hundreds of random ones from all over the place.

Though he could (if he resigns), thechnically, claim Constructive Dismissal, in reality that is a ridiculous concept in this case.

If Benitez wanted to go through months of process & eventually win approx. £3,500 then he could, but your lawyer guy should understand the reality of this option.
Fair enough, I'll tell him

Don't like the guy anyway, he send emails in 24-point bold

his signature isn't pink and joined up is it?

Dave Sutton's barnet · Post by **Dave Sutton's barnet** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:23 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:The constructive dismissal idea was apparently floated in a few papers this morning, which may be why I received an email from a motormouth lawyer who's always trying to get his face in the media on football law
Then the motor-mouth lawyer is an idiot.
Fair enough, I'll tell him. Don't like the guy anyway, he send emails in 24-point bold
his signature isn't pink and joined up is it?

Dunno, I never get that far down

Abdoulaye's Twin · Post by **Abdoulaye's Twin** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:27 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:The constructive dismissal idea was apparently floated in a few papers this morning, which may be why I received an email from a motormouth lawyer who's always trying to get his face in the media on football law
Then the motor-mouth lawyer is an idiot.
Fair enough, I'll tell him. Don't like the guy anyway, he send emails in 24-point bold
his signature isn't pink and joined up is it?
Dunno, I never get that far down

theres loads in my office that have that - weird

bobo the clown · Post by **bobo the clown** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:47 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:Then the motor-mouth lawyer is an idiot.
Fair enough, I'll tell him. Don't like the guy anyway, he send emails in 24-point bold
his signature isn't pink and joined up is it?
Dunno, I never get that far down
theres loads in my office that have that - weird

Partially sighted, maybe ? ... or just affected ponces ??

DSB, do tell him ... I'd love to hear his response.

jmjhb · Post by **jmjhb** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:18 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:The constructive dismissal idea was apparently floated in a few papers this morning, which may be why I received an email from a motormouth lawyer who's always trying to get his face in the media on football law

If you don't mind me asking, which paper do you work for?

blurred · Post by **blurred** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:37 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:What are your thoughts, or indeed the general thoughts down your way regarding the reported interest from the Saudi Arabians, Blurred?

I don't think I can give a consensus, because I'm not sure there is one. I think there are some people who'd take anyone except the Yanks, and seem so intent on getting rid of them that they haven't looked at what's coming the other way.

I shall retain cautious optimism, as I had when the current owners took over. It's easy to talk the talk but much harder to walk the walk, and these cowboys have come unstuck pretty quickly. It all depends on what they are willing to put in, and what they are looking to take out; unfortunately nobody knows their intents (assuming they do come in and buy out Hicks and/or Gillet). There's credible arguments for doom-mongers and optimists alike.

Tombwfc · Post by **Tombwfc** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:01 am

Aye, i'm not sure how you could form an opinion either way. Theres nothing to suggest that the Arabs won't just come in and sack Benitez on the spot anyway. Perhaps it is a case of 'better the devil you know' and opt for stability.

boltonboris · Post by **boltonboris** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:08 pm

jmjhb wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:The constructive dismissal idea was apparently floated in a few papers this morning, which may be why I received an email from a motormouth lawyer who's always trying to get his face in the media on football law
If you don't mind me asking, which paper do you work for?

Fourfourtwo I believe..

Could be wrong

Probably wrong

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:13 pm

i signed up for this online offer for When Saturday Comes, £20 for two years. Not bad.

4-4-2 is a little too flashy for my tastes these days, but it was my fave when i was younger

Dave Sutton's barnet · Post by **Dave Sutton's barnet** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:06 pm

boltonboris wrote:
jmjhb wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:The constructive dismissal idea was apparently floated in a few papers this morning, which may be why I received an email from a motormouth lawyer who's always trying to get his face in the media on football law
If you don't mind me asking, which paper do you work for?
Fourfourtwo I believe..

Could be wrong

Probably wrong

No, you're right (I answered via PM)

Batman wrote:i signed up for this online offer for When Saturday Comes, £20 for two years. Not bad.

Might have a bit of that myself - is it still extant?

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:15 pm

it was on their site before Crimbo

bargainous

Bruce Rioja · Post by **Bruce Rioja** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:02 pm

Batman wrote: 4-4-2 is a little too flashy for my tastes these days,

Yes, you'd be better off with Shoot, or maybe Roy of the Rovers.

Batman · Post by **Batman** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:04 pm

i get Motoring and Leisure delivered courtesy of my CSMA insurance, and that is more than enough.

One glance at the letters page with more ramblings about 'youngsters and their personalised plates' and I'm no use for anything else.

chester white · Post by **chester white** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:42 pm

2-1 Villa, 10 minutes left!

You're getting sacked in the morning!!!

mummywhycantieatcrayons · Post by **mummywhycantieatcrayons** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:49 pm

chester white wrote:2-1 Villa, 10 minutes left!

You're getting sacked in the morning!!!

feck, Crouch for 2-2.

James B · Post by **James B** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:52 pm

blurred wrote:You heard it here first, we're gonna win the league

Perhaps not, but there's a good feel to things this season.

Tombwfc · Post by **Tombwfc** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:05 pm

I wonder if Liverpool fans will realise, late goal or not, that this isn't a blip, they aren't going to kick into gear and win every game between now and the end of the season in a triumphant justification of Rafas rotation policy. They're just an average team who, cup runs aside, have done nothing but stagnate under Rafa.

bobo the clown · Post by **bobo the clown** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:12 pm

Returning to the theme that Rafa Benitez is a prick ... doesn't it strike you that there's one huge PR exercise going on at the moment, to present him as the fans firm favourite & Hicks as the evil kingslayer ?

Odd that most Liverpool fans I speak to see him as flawed, too often a PR embarrassment and his rotation policy as a disaster.

I think his team are behind the publicity stunts, which is why they always get a big build-up, with huge media exposure ... beforehand but when push comes to shove they come to very little at t the actual games.

Why would this be the case ???

BECAUSE HE'S A PRICK !!

If I was Hicks ... even if I wanted out, I'd sack the bastard first. (I bet eveyone's stunned at that conclusion !!)

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:16 pm

Benitez is a cra.p manager and is wasting everyones time at Liverpool. I think everyone but deluded Scousers knows this is the case!

Montreal Wanderer · Post by **Montreal Wanderer** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:37 pm

Why didn't we thing of this?

Havant and Waterlooville chairman Marcus Hackney has urged potential Liverpool investors DIC to buy his club rather than the Merseysiders. (Sun)

Connect with your social network account

Benitez .... prick

Who is online