England 6- Andoran Wheeltappers and Shunters 0.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31783
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
All ITV to a man, but things aren't much better on the government channel, where the withering decline of Motty has left a void. Jonathan Pearce's shrieking overdrive and pompous flannel would be bad enough but it's increasingly accompanied by missing the bleeding obvious; on the third replay he'll notice something that the rest of the ground knew already and act like he's cracked the secret code, before covering his fat ass by questioning his own decision ("Oh! It took a deflection, did it!?!?").
As for Lawro's smug panto act, I don't mind it on the MotD sofa, but it rather gets in the way in the commentary box. Like many others, you end up wondering precisely what expertise he brings: analysis of the split-second offside decisions taken by top-level defenders, or third-rate end-of-pier comedy stylings?
As for Lawro's smug panto act, I don't mind it on the MotD sofa, but it rather gets in the way in the commentary box. Like many others, you end up wondering precisely what expertise he brings: analysis of the split-second offside decisions taken by top-level defenders, or third-rate end-of-pier comedy stylings?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38940
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Well I'll be swimming against the tide here, but I still think nobody can beat Andy Gray for co-commentary and analysis.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:All ITV to a man, but things aren't much better on the government channel, where the withering decline of Motty has left a void. Jonathan Pearce's shrieking overdrive and pompous flannel would be bad enough but it's increasingly accompanied by missing the bleeding obvious; on the third replay he'll notice something that the rest of the ground knew already and act like he's cracked the secret code, before covering his fat ass by questioning his own decision ("Oh! It took a deflection, did it!?!?").
As for Lawro's smug panto act, I don't mind it on the MotD sofa, but it rather gets in the way in the commentary box. Like many others, you end up wondering precisely what expertise he brings: analysis of the split-second offside decisions taken by top-level defenders, or third-rate end-of-pier comedy stylings?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31783
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
BWFCi - Gray's good when he sticks to analysis rather than the sort of opinions which make his eyebrows disappear over the top of his head like Penfold.
Collymore's not bad either, compared to some with a lot more experience.
I still think my favourite sidekick is Graham Taylor. Bags of experience, plenty humility pot-England and a very lovely man.
Collymore's not bad either, compared to some with a lot more experience.
I still think my favourite sidekick is Graham Taylor. Bags of experience, plenty humility pot-England and a very lovely man.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38940
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Aye Graham Taylor is a good un.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:BWFCi - Gray's good when he sticks to analysis rather than the sort of opinions which make his eyebrows disappear over the top of his head like Penfold.
Collymore's not bad either, compared to some with a lot more experience.
I still think my favourite sidekick is Graham Taylor. Bags of experience, plenty humility pot-England and a very lovely man.
What opinions of Grays are you referring to?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31783
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
To his credit it's not often during commentary; he knows the difference between report/analysis and mouthing off, unlike, say, that immense waste of blood Alan Green
It's more often (quite correctly) on his half-hour Last Word programme; when he explains something to "Richarrrd" something that he thinks might be slightly controversial, his voice goes up and octave and his eyebrows six inches, often followed somewhat redundantly by "...I really believe that"
But in-match, fine, although I'd rather he curbed his "take a bow, son"s
It's more often (quite correctly) on his half-hour Last Word programme; when he explains something to "Richarrrd" something that he thinks might be slightly controversial, his voice goes up and octave and his eyebrows six inches, often followed somewhat redundantly by "...I really believe that"
But in-match, fine, although I'd rather he curbed his "take a bow, son"s
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests