Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:05 pm
That was sharp Bruce!!Bruce Rioja wrote:Is Terry Butcher involved?FaninOz wrote: like Portsmouth some "cleaver" accounting practices are being used
Bolton Wanderers Forum The-Wanderer.co.uk
The Wanderer, A Bolton Wanderers (BWFC) Forum. This message board is part of the main site.
https://the-wanderer.co.uk/
West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
Page 112 of 207
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:01 pm
We just have to hope that there are two more sides (not us!) as bad as West Ham in this division. God, they were shite today!
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:02 pm
Indeed...seeing them today made me realise I shouldn't be so over the moon about beating them. Christ they are bad!
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:24 pm
If Tottenham had turned up they may have eclipsed the 9-1 scoreline...Parker went off early though in fairness
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:24 pm
WET SPAM IS GOIN DOWN
may we take parker and upson off you
may we take parker and upson off you
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:40 pm
Even less backbone than us.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:37 pm
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:53 pm
My teas gone cold I'm wondering why...
Girls done well for herself, any road up.
Girls done well for herself, any road up.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:21 am
Hahaha!
It's an old one, but a good one.
It's an old one, but a good one.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:09 am
Great, ain't it?
I think Tony Fernandes would have been the better bet, now we'll just have to hope Zola/Clarke keep their jobs.
I think Tony Fernandes would have been the better bet, now we'll just have to hope Zola/Clarke keep their jobs.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:58 am
David Sullivan was on talksport a few minutes ago. Basically Zola is staying and you're looking to take over the Olympic Stadium after 2012.fozzy wrote:Great, ain't it?
I think Tony Fernandes would have been the better bet, now we'll just have to hope Zola/Clarke keep their jobs.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:36 am
Really? What for? They've spent a bloody fortune on The Boleyn. They only have the chicken run left to do and they moved the pitch to accomodate that (although their plans were somewhat scuppered by relegation).Gary The Beaver wrote:David Sullivan was on talksport a few minutes ago. Basically Zola is staying and you're looking to take over the Olympic Stadium after 2012.fozzy wrote:Great, ain't it?
I think Tony Fernandes would have been the better bet, now we'll just have to hope Zola/Clarke keep their jobs.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:48 am
Sell the land Bruce? Don't know what it'll be worth, but I'm guessing a government looking at slash and burn policies to avert financial disaster would do anything to unload a white elephant in the East End. They'll probably get it cheap (long lease?) like the COMS, and make some money off The Boelyn.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:02 am
Sullivan was talking about West Ham being the people's club. Kids for a quid and OAP's for three quid sort of stuff.
What I didn't realise was that after the Olympics the stadium was due to be turned from an 80,000 capacity venue to a 25,000 seater Rugby ground. Problem is all the facilities have been designed in the upper tiers which means a complete re-think and another waste of money.
I think it should stay as it is, and Spurs and West Ham should be made to share with CPO's issued on White Hart Lane and Upton Park.
What I didn't realise was that after the Olympics the stadium was due to be turned from an 80,000 capacity venue to a 25,000 seater Rugby ground. Problem is all the facilities have been designed in the upper tiers which means a complete re-think and another waste of money.
I think it should stay as it is, and Spurs and West Ham should be made to share with CPO's issued on White Hart Lane and Upton Park.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:12 am
So what's happened to this 'permanent home for British Athletics' that Seb Coe and his acolytes were droning on about?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:46 am
erm... they lied?Bruce Rioja wrote:So what's happened to this 'permanent home for British Athletics' that Seb Coe and his acolytes were droning on about?
There are already places like Crystal Palace and Lee Valley and some of the other venues will remain. Just not the Olympic Stadium.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:52 am
Meanwhile his Birmingham City charged up to £45 per game, god knows what they'll try and get away with in London...Gary The Beaver wrote:Sullivan was talking about West Ham being the people's club. Kids for a quid and OAP's for three quid sort of stuff.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:57 am
No decision's been made at the moment. Some want it for athletics, others for football, some want it at 80,000, others at 25,000. It's known as 'legacy planning'Bruce Rioja wrote:So what's happened to this 'permanent home for British Athletics' that Seb Coe and his acolytes were droning on about?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:56 pm
Got to feel a bit sorry for West Ham fans. Reading this Premier League relegation blog it seems they're welcoming the Gold/Sullivan take over. I'm pretty sure Birmingham fans would have a few choice words to say about them... Still, it looks like the only alternative was administration.
Wait, what am I saying, feel sorry for West Ham fans... Let's hope Gold/Sullivan bring a new era of chaos for them...
Wait, what am I saying, feel sorry for West Ham fans... Let's hope Gold/Sullivan bring a new era of chaos for them...
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:58 pm
Dammit, now I have to do some work!rockthereebok wrote:Got to feel a bit sorry for West Ham fans. Reading this Premier League relegation blog it seems they're welcoming the Gold/Sullivan take over. I'm pretty sure Birmingham fans would have a few choice words to say about them... Still, it looks like the only alternative was administration.
Wait, what am I saying, feel sorry for West Ham fans... Let's hope Gold/Sullivan bring a new era of chaos for them...