West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:44 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Why would Jenas want to join West Ham

Maybe he wants another England call up cos its fcuking nailed on he'll get one if he cleans the bogs at Spurs or moves to West Ham
I've edited this because it didn't make much sense initially.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:33 pm

Anyone here forgotten why they hate West Ham? :conf:

Try these little gems from today's KUMB site.

Yep I have to agree with this. Apparently Abramovitch has set aside a bundle of millions for when he eventually gets bored at them failing to win the Champions League. However, the owners at Man Utd, Liverpool, Man City et al - will they really give 2 of them about legends of the game going t*ts up?
As much as I would love to see all the above clubs implode, would it really be good for English football? Do we really want to be watching dross like Stoke and Wigan survive in Premiership just because they've got "sensible" British owners? I long for the day when Leeds,Notts Forest, Southampton even Palace and QPR come up to the Premiership and replace the likes of these 2. I keep saying it but teams like Wigan are all that is wrong in the Premiership - 14000 fans they had on Saturday and I would reckon that about 2 or 3000 of them were Wolves. We came close to oblivion ourselves and although it would give us countless bragging rights over the Man Utd, Liverpool etc fans, do we really want to be watching "well run " clubs like Blackburn and Wigan in the European places?


Interesting point. I’ve long thought the same about all these tinpot Lancashire teams. I just don’t see them contributing much long-term to the rich tapestry of the top division.

That'll be the rich tapestry of the top division that West Ham contribute to how exactly?

Tossers, all of 'em.
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:45 pm

And that'll be the same Wigan that had a side in the Rugby play-off final at O/T on the same day.
May the bridges I burn light your way

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:31 pm

A little quiz for the Chimney Sweeps.

Put these sides in descending order for number of years in the top flight:

Forest
West Ham
QPR
Southampton
Leeds
Blackburn
Wigan
Bolton
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:49 pm

If these wankers take over the Olympic stadium, what are the financials?

Do we know?
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:40 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:If these wankers take over the Olympic stadium, what are the financials?

Do we know?
Taxpayer probably foots the bill and we'll call it quits for the World Cup.

I want Spurs to get it so, so, so much. Firstly so that both they and Arsenal fans implode due to the 'Arsenal have moved on our patch oh no now we've gone'/ 'Haha Spurs have left North London and their roots the shithou....oh wait'. But mainly, almost exclusively in fact, despite my hatred of the North London duo, because the two Davids are grade A* (now at A-Level) c*nts.
Sullivan wrote: " It would be such a slap in the face to east London. If it happens, there will be real problems that could easily lead to civil unrest. I think there could be riots, such is the ill feeling between West Ham and Spurs and I know the police feel the same.


I feel very let down by Tottenham. The way they do business is not right. They pinched Eidur Gudjohnsen off us after we brought him from Barcelona for talks. He just disappeared from the hotel. And the way they unsettled Scott Parker was appalling.

Now they want to move into our borough of Newham. How would they like it if we suddenly set up a new home in Haringey. I’m flabbergasted by the cheek of it."
Yeah. The cheek.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:50 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:A little quiz for the Chimney Sweeps.

Put these sides in descending order for number of years in the top flight:

Forest
West Ham
QPR
Southampton
Leeds
Blackburn
Wigan
Bolton
I'd have a go if I could be sure what 'descending order' means here... Highest number of years at the top?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:12 pm

Prufrock wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:If these wankers take over the Olympic stadium, what are the financials?

Do we know?
Taxpayer probably foots the bill and we'll call it quits for the World Cup.

I want Spurs to get it so, so, so much. Firstly so that both they and Arsenal fans implode due to the 'Arsenal have moved on our patch oh no now we've gone'/ 'Haha Spurs have left North London and their roots the shithou....oh wait'. But mainly, almost exclusively in fact, despite my hatred of the North London duo, because the two Davids are grade A* (now at A-Level) c*nts.
Sullivan wrote: " It would be such a slap in the face to east London. If it happens, there will be real problems that could easily lead to civil unrest. I think there could be riots, such is the ill feeling between West Ham and Spurs and I know the police feel the same.


I feel very let down by Tottenham. The way they do business is not right. They pinched Eidur Gudjohnsen off us after we brought him from Barcelona for talks. He just disappeared from the hotel. And the way they unsettled Scott Parker was appalling.

Now they want to move into our borough of Newham. How would they like it if we suddenly set up a new home in Haringey. I’m flabbergasted by the cheek of it."
Yeah. The cheek.
It's just an obvious ploy to get planning approval for their new Harringey stadium - they won't to east london.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Post by jimbo » Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:01 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:And that'll be the same Wigan that had a side in the Rugby play-off final at O/T on the same day.
Yeh, but in Wigan the footy fans hate the rugby set up and vice versa. Even so, the footy kicked off at lunchtime affording plenty of time to make the rugby at 6. No excuse is that one!

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:06 pm

jimbo wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:And that'll be the same Wigan that had a side in the Rugby play-off final at O/T on the same day.
Yeh, but in Wigan the footy fans hate the rugby set up and vice versa.
Only in dog-end circles. :wink:
May the bridges I burn light your way

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:08 pm

Prufrock wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:If these wankers take over the Olympic stadium, what are the financials?

Do we know?
Taxpayer probably foots the bill and we'll call it quits for the World Cup.

I want Spurs to get it so, so, so much. Firstly so that both they and Arsenal fans implode due to the 'Arsenal have moved on our patch oh no now we've gone'/ 'Haha Spurs have left North London and their roots the shithou....oh wait'. But mainly, almost exclusively in fact, despite my hatred of the North London duo, because the two Davids are grade A* (now at A-Level) c*nts.
Sullivan wrote: " It would be such a slap in the face to east London. If it happens, there will be real problems that could easily lead to civil unrest. I think there could be riots, such is the ill feeling between West Ham and Spurs and I know the police feel the same.


I feel very let down by Tottenham. The way they do business is not right. They pinched Eidur Gudjohnsen off us after we brought him from Barcelona for talks. He just disappeared from the hotel. And the way they unsettled Scott Parker was appalling.

Now they want to move into our borough of Newham. How would they like it if we suddenly set up a new home in Haringey. I’m flabbergasted by the cheek of it."
Yeah. The cheek.
And Leyton Orients chairman aint too happy with the 'Ammers either..
"This is total hypocrisy on his part. This is a case of Tesco`s moving next to the little sweet shop on the corner as far as I'm concerned.'

"I'm upset because no one is talking about the damage West Ham will do us because it would be terminal. It would kill the club stone dead."
http://www.orient.vitalfootball.co.uk/a ... p?a=216124
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:39 pm

William the White wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:A little quiz for the Chimney Sweeps.

Put these sides in descending order for number of years in the top flight:

Forest
West Ham
QPR
Southampton
Leeds
Blackburn
Wigan
Bolton
I'd have a go if I could be sure what 'descending order' means here... Highest number of years at the top?
Yup.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

ROVERS F.C.
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:56 pm

Post by ROVERS F.C. » Fri Oct 08, 2010 6:56 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:Anyone here forgotten why they hate West Ham? :conf:


Interesting point. I’ve long thought the same about all these tinpot Lancashire teams. I just don’t see them contributing much long-term to the rich tapestry of the top division.

That'll be the rich tapestry of the top division that West Ham contribute to how exactly?

Tossers, all of 'em.

And what should we expect Zulu from the modern day football 'fan' who cares nothing for history and tradition?.These are the types who swallow every tale told in the red top rags with their BIG CITY-BIG CLUB bias......Brainwashed or should that be Braindead? :)

I admire West Ham fans for their loyalty to their club but by christ they are some of the most arrogant 'billy big bollocks' nice people around.



I do believe the top two clubs in the above top flight list are Bolton closely followed by Rovers.

P.S. Rovers scored our 1000th top flight goal against Blackpool, only 11 other clubs in the country have achieved this football milestone.....no place for us little clubs at the big boys table!!! LOL
PROUD BLACKBURN ROVERS FC....THE MOST SUCCESSFUL TOWN CLUB IN THE UK

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:18 pm

Without looking this lot up - i promise - here's my go:

Bolton
Blackburn
Forest
Leeds
West Ham
Southampton
QPR
Wigan

Any right?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:24 pm

William the White wrote:Without looking this lot up - i promise - here's my go:

Bolton
Blackburn
Forest
Leeds
West Ham
Southampton
QPR
Wigan

Any right?
I did look it up and that's pretty damn good, William. Not perfect mind. Two need to be flipped and they were only one season apart.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:22 pm

Its been too long since I last did this, and I can't be arsed looking now, all I know is we come out on top, Blackburn (as t'rrrrrrrooooverrrrrs fan says) are second, and Leeds and West Ham are a good 20 years ish behind the pair of us.

Frankly, after that, I don't really care, cos QPR and Southampton will have to be playing til doomsday to pass us.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:39 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Its been too long since I last did this, and I can't be arsed looking now, all I know is we come out on top, Blackburn (as t'rrrrrrrooooverrrrrs fan says) are second, and Leeds and West Ham are a good 20 years ish behind the pair of us.

Frankly, after that, I don't really care, cos QPR and Southampton will have to be playing til doomsday to pass us.
Then let me help if no one else wishes to guess.




1. Everton (105)
2. Aston V. (97)
3. Liverpool (93)
4. Arsenal (91)
5. Manchester U. (83)
6. Manchester C. (79)
7. Newcastle U. (78)
8. Sunderland (77)
9= Chelsea & Tottenham H. (73)
11. West Bromwich A. (71)
12. Bolton W. (69)
13. Blackburn R. (68)
14. Sheffield W. (66)
15. Derby Co. (65)
16= Sheffield U. & Wolverhampton W. (60)
18. Middlesbrough (59)
19. Nottingham F. (56)
20. Birmingham C. (55)
21. Stoke C. (52)
22= Burnley & West Ham U. (51)
24. Leeds U. (50)
25= Leicester C. & Preston N.E. (46)
27. Southampton (35)
28. Coventry C. (34)
29. Portsmouth (31)
30= Huddersfield T. & Notts Co. (30)
32. Blackpool (27)
33= Charlton A. & Ipswich T. (26)
35. Bury (22)
36. Norwich C. (21)
37. Queen's Park R. (20)
38. Fulham (19)
39. Luton T. (16)
40. Cardiff C. (15)
41. Wimbledon (14)
42. Crystal Palace (13)
43= Bradford C.; Grimsby T. & Oldham A. (12)
46. Bristol C. (9)
47. Watford (8)
48= Accrington & Brentford (5)
50. Brighton & Hove A. (4)
51= Bradford P. A.; Oxford U. & Wigan A. (3)
54= Darwen; Millwall; Reading & Swansea C. (2)
58= Barnsley; Carlisle U.; Glossop; Leyton O.; Northampton T. & Swindon T. (1)
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:40 pm

I'm sure thats wrong.

I'm positive we've passed 70.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:41 pm

:shock: The sunglasses appear after any team that has a number ending in 8 )
It was not my comment.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:43 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm sure thats wrong.

I'm positive we've passed 70.
Quite correct, your lordship. The list was as of the end of the 2007/08 season so add 3 to anyone who is still there (deducting points for those who were not there for all three seasons).
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests