Champions League tonight
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36439
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Apart from a 25 minute spell in the second half, Chelsea completely pissed on Liverpool last night.Lord Kangana wrote:The 90 minutes at Anfield you were the better team, granted.blurred wrote:I wouldn't say far better, but I have said they deserved it. Over the 180 minutes of normal time we were the better side, but they were better when it came down to the crunch in extra time, and so they progress. It's just one of those things.Lord Kangana wrote:...and C) Chelsea were far the better team on this occasion?
But Chelsea were the better team for 90 minutes at theirs. And trust me, if you'd asked a neutral (say like myself) who had spent more on their first team, I'd say it was glaringly obvious last night. You can either take that as a slight, or a viewpoint.
Mind Chelsea are a far better team than Liverpool so you'd expect it.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Go back a while HP.(I'm talking under Allardyce). Nolan used to stand way offside to the extent that everybody wondered what the fxxk he was doing. It was a regular thing for a while as I'm sure any long-standing fan will tell you.H. Pedersen wrote:But to my recollection he only does that on corners, where there is no offside. I don't think he's dumb enough to try it on free kicks. We're talking about Bolton here, linesmen aren't brave enough to make a controversial decision like that in our favor . . . unless we're already thumping a small team like Doncaster and it's irrelevant (ask Idan Tal).TANGODANCER wrote:We'll not er, forget Kev Nolan's permanent position fro free kick etc, shall we? Let's also look a couple of seasons back and remember where he stood then, blatantly offside in the real meaning of the term.
Weirdest application of the offside rule I've ever seen was a Liverpool game where somebody played in Cisse, who was clearly offside. But he let it run through his legs, somebody else picked it up, and they scored. Evidently Cisse "didn't interfere with play" . . . good luck seeing that ruling for any team outside the Big 4. Anyone else see that?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28832
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:03 am
- Location: Leigh
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests