Page 172 of 207

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:56 am
by CrazyHorse
boltonboris wrote:I'd nob her
:conf:
Which one, Brady or Margaret?

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:12 am
by Bruce Rioja
CrazyHorse wrote:
boltonboris wrote:I'd nob her
:conf:
Which one, Brady or Margaret?
Or maybe a Ménage à trois?

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:20 am
by CrazyHorse
A boltonboris sandwich? Perhaps with Lord Sugar watching on; with him firing the one at the end who he feels didn't perform as well as he expected them to. Liking the idea.

Better than the usual guff on telly anyway.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:22 am
by Bruce Rioja
Like I say - I've absolutely no idea what possible benefit West Ham think there is in moving from a proper football stadium which has recently had three sides re-built, to an athletics stadium.? As you say, good for athletics though and the 2017 bid - I might enter myself into the sit-ups event :D

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:21 am
by boltonboris
That Pescisolido woman.. She's a bell-end, but I'd put in a shift

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:13 pm
by bobo the clown
Bruce Rioja wrote:Like I say - I've absolutely no idea what possible benefit West Ham think there is in moving from a proper football stadium which has recently had three sides re-built, to an athletics stadium.? As you say, good for athletics though and the 2017 bid - I might enter myself into the sit-ups event :D
..... oh, this is scary. I KNEW every word of that ! Like I'd seen it before.

Well, it'll save them robbing, sorry BORROWING £40m from the council .... in these times !! .... and make someone other than them responsible for the place. I'd see it as an advantage to them, especially if they sign a v v long lease and STILL sell Upton Park !

All in all, short & medium term they come out as winners I'd think.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:14 pm
by Raven
Surely Boris is joking.............gross

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:32 pm
by Gooner Girl
Bruce Rioja wrote:Like I say - I've absolutely no idea what possible benefit West Ham think there is in moving from a proper football stadium which has recently had three sides re-built, to an athletics stadium.? As you say, good for athletics though and the 2017 bid - I might enter myself into the sit-ups event :D
I wouldn't bother ;) Why don't you try the High Jump Bruce? You're nice and tall. Hows your Fosbury Flop? :D

This could be the first part of your training... 8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVZ3ZcorTF0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:39 pm
by Worthy4England
Gooner Girl wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Like I say - I've absolutely no idea what possible benefit West Ham think there is in moving from a proper football stadium which has recently had three sides re-built, to an athletics stadium.? As you say, good for athletics though and the 2017 bid - I might enter myself into the sit-ups event :D
Hows your Fosbury Flop?
At Bruce's age, he can get pills from the doctors that'll help with that.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:42 pm
by bobo the clown
The girls asks ".... how's your Fosbury Flop ?" ... and she then crit's people for seeing double-entendres everywhere !!!

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:42 pm
by Gooner Girl
Worthy4England wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Like I say - I've absolutely no idea what possible benefit West Ham think there is in moving from a proper football stadium which has recently had three sides re-built, to an athletics stadium.? As you say, good for athletics though and the 2017 bid - I might enter myself into the sit-ups event :D
Hows your Fosbury Flop?
At Bruce's age, he can get pills from the doctors that'll help with that.
And how do you know?! :grin:

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:45 pm
by Worthy4England
Gooner Girl wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Like I say - I've absolutely no idea what possible benefit West Ham think there is in moving from a proper football stadium which has recently had three sides re-built, to an athletics stadium.? As you say, good for athletics though and the 2017 bid - I might enter myself into the sit-ups event :D
Hows your Fosbury Flop?
At Bruce's age, he can get pills from the doctors that'll help with that.
And how do you know?! :grin:
My dad told me.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:46 pm
by Gooner Girl
bobo the clown wrote:The girls asks ".... how's your Fosbury Flop ?" ... and she then crit's people for seeing double-entendres everywhere !!!
Tsk, you lot and your innuendo! Its the most popular way of High jumping these days!

Fosbury Flop - named after Dick Fosbury. Although yan understand why they didn't use his first name when naming it, can't you?!

FYI Bobo

The Fosbury Flop is a style used in the athletics event of high jump. It was popularized and perfected by American athlete Dick Fosbury, whose gold medal in the 1968 Summer Olympics brought it to the world's attention. Over the next few years the flop became the dominant style of the event and remains so today. Before Fosbury, most elite jumpers used the Straddle technique, Western Roll, Eastern cut-off or even Scissors-Jump to clear the bar. Given that landing surfaces had previously been sandpits or low piles of matting, high jumpers of earlier years had to land on their feet or at least land carefully to prevent injury. With the advent of deep foam matting high jumpers were able to be more adventurous in their landing styles and hence experiment with styles of jumping.

The approach (or run-up) in the Flop style of high jump is characterised by (at least) the final four or five steps being run in a curve, allowing the athlete to lean in to his or her turn, away from the bar. This allows the center of gravity to be lowered even before knee flexion, giving a longer time period for the take-off thrust. Additionally, on take-off the sudden move from inward lean outwards produces a rotation of the jumper's body along the axis of the bar, aiding clearance. Combined with the rotation around the jumper's vertical axis produced by the drive leg (think of an ice skater spinning round on the spot) the resulting body position on bar clearance is laid out supine with the body at ninety degrees to the bar with the head and shoulders crossing the bar before the trunk and legs. This gives the Flop its characteristic "backwards over the bar" appearance, with the athlete landing on the mat on their shoulders and back. While in flight the athlete can progressively arch shoulders, back and legs in a rolling motion, keeping as much of the body as possible below the bar. It is possible for the athlete to clear the bar while his or her body's center of mass remains as much as 20 cm below it.[1] While the Straddle style required strength in the takeoff knee and could be used by relatively burly athletes (cf. Valeriy Brumel), the Flop allowed athletes of a slender build to use their co-ordination to greater effect and not risk the knee injuries which they had previously suffered from other styles.

Predominantly, athletes using the Flop use a "J" shaped approach, where the first three to five strides head in a straight line at ninety degrees to the bar, with the final four to five being run in a curve as noted above. Some athletes prefer to run all of their strides in a curve; this is known as a "C" shape approach. This was the approach used by Fosbury himself but can lead to errors and inconsistencies in speed, foot placement, angle of approach and body attitude at take-off.

Purists will note that Fosbury himself cleared the bar with his hands by his sides, whereas many athletes cross the bar with their arms held out sidewards or even above their heads, optimising their mass distribution. Hence the "Fosbury Flop" can be differentiated from "The Flop".

For similar reasons noted as drawbacks to the "C" shaped approach the optimal speed of approach in the Flop is not a full out sprint. Similarly, increasing the number of strides beyond eight or ten is not recommended unless the athlete has achieved high consistency in the approach and can handle the increased speed. The angle of take-off towards the bar is usually somewhere between fifteen and thirty degrees. The angle must not be too shallow or the jumper jumps too far along the bar, landing on it. If the angle is too wide, there is not enough time to "lay out" in the air.

The "drive" leg (which is thrust into the air first at take-off) is always the nearer leg to the bar. Thus someone who uses a left foot take-off (where the left foot transmits the jump force and is the latter to leave the ground) will approach the bar from its right hand side, curving to their left so that the bar approaches their right shoulder. The right leg will drive into the air and the jumper's body rotates anti-clockwise around the vertical axis to present their back to the bar in flight.

As well as driving the leg and hips at take-off, the athlete should drive or even swing their arms into the air, contributing to the upwards momentum.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:49 pm
by bobo the clown
I watched it happen at the time girl, being an owd git 'n all.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:02 pm
by thebish
Gooner Girl wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:The girls asks ".... how's your Fosbury Flop ?" ... and she then crit's people for seeing double-entendres everywhere !!!
Tsk, you lot and your innuendo! Its the most popular way of High jumping these days!
<snip>

or.... you could just walk round it? :conf:

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:30 pm
by Gooner Girl
thebish wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:The girls asks ".... how's your Fosbury Flop ?" ... and she then crit's people for seeing double-entendres everywhere !!!
Tsk, you lot and your innuendo! Its the most popular way of High jumping these days!
<snip>

or.... you could just walk round it? :conf:
:roll: One day Philip, i will get you to one of my athletics matches and educate you so you learn to love this fine sport...

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:12 am
by Prufrock
Does Bobo really get away with typing 'she then crit's people'?!


GANGSTAAAAA

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:51 am
by bobo the clown
Prufrock wrote:Does Bobo really get away with typing 'she then crit's people'?!

GANGSTAAAAA
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

I'm dissing me now.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:53 am
by Worthy4England
bobo the clown wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Does Bobo really get away with typing 'she then crit's people'?!

GANGSTAAAAA
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

I'm dissing me now.
:lol: Innit.

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:13 pm
by Hoboh
Worthy4England wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Like I say - I've absolutely no idea what possible benefit West Ham think there is in moving from a proper football stadium which has recently had three sides re-built, to an athletics stadium.? As you say, good for athletics though and the 2017 bid - I might enter myself into the sit-ups event :D
Hows your Fosbury Flop?
At Bruce's age, he can get pills from the doctors that'll help with that.
Hell I tried one once 2 feckin' days and sore bits later thought better left well alone!!! (didn't help the Mrs having headache either :( )