West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by thebish » Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:56 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
One thing I will give Coyle...

:shock: careful!! :wink:

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13657
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by Hoboh » Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:58 pm

Now perhaps Gartside is talking rubbish, but the fact is that Eddie Davies wasn't prepared to do whatever plan Allardyce had. And Gartside told me that they felt Allardyce was "bored" and didn't expect Bolton to go anywhere near what he wanted and was therefore just looking for an excuse for getting out.
You are Nixon!!!! I claim my tenner!

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by Prufrock » Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:15 am

This Megson and Coyle policy making a profit on players. I can only remember making a real profit of one player in recent times. French bloke. Played up top. Who signed him?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

a1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by a1 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:51 am

imo, the lenth of the contacts given out by bolton to new signings is what kinda prevents us 'making most profit'.

ngog's being 3 year had me 'worried' straight away , due to remembering what happened with elmander going for nowt.

i'm not sure what the thinking behind it is. probably relegation fears (no!!!!).

the anelka contract (and the improvement) were one of the times they got it right. kinda luckily, considering he were "le sulk" previously at a few clubs.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:58 am

a1 wrote:imo, the lenth of the contacts given out by bolton to new signings is what kinda prevents us 'making most profit'.

ngog's being 3 year had me 'worried' straight away , due to remembering what happened with elmander going for nowt.

i'm not sure what the thinking behind it is. probably relegation fears (no!!!!).

the anelka contract (and the improvement) were one of the times they got it right. kinda luckily, considering he were "le sulk" previously at a few clubs.
We signed Al Habsi for four years and made a profit. We might have signed Elmander for longer if he'd done something on the first two years we had him. Cahill was not a bad deal either - would have been nice to sign him longer but I don't think he wanted that. If we sell SKD to Sunderland for anything we've made a profit. Frankly it's all a gamble - long or short.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:54 am

Prufrock wrote:This Megson and Coyle policy making a profit on players. I can only remember making a real profit of one player in recent times. French bloke. Played up top. Who signed him?
Well we made a profit on Cahill, albeit a smaller one because we sold him late on.

I think the emphasis is on younger players.

Assuming CYL comes back big profit there if we want it.

Same with Mark Davies.

Coyle is trying to take it even further!

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:55 am

An even smaller profit when you deduct Aston Villa's cut.
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:55 am

We bought that clause out
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:56 am

boltonboris wrote:We bought that clause out
I stand corrected. How much did it cost us to buy it out? :D
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:04 am

I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).

No issue with that.

I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13657
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by Hoboh » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:28 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).

No issue with that.

I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
5 games on and your now a "Coyle man" Bah! I knew you were Nixon testing the waters all along!

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:37 am

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:
boltonboris wrote:We bought that clause out
I stand corrected. How much did it cost us to buy it out? :D
I can't remember. The figure I have in my head was about £700k. But it seems high. I can't remember if the percentage agreement was his sale price, or profit of sale price. I hope it was the former..... Otherwise, money wasted!
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:42 am

Hoboh wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).

No issue with that.

I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
5 games on and your now a "Coyle man" Bah! I knew you were Nixon testing the waters all along!
Not at all. But you have to judge a siuation in its fullest.

If he gets results like Liverpool and continues to improve our youth setup, then thats good. He must keep us up for me and seeing as he's not going to be sacked thats how I'll judge him!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by thebish » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:59 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).

No issue with that.

I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....

I thought you said what Coyle was doing was being like a cancer in the club and completely destroying it?

now what he's doing will leave us stronger??

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by Prufrock » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:44 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Prufrock wrote:This Megson and Coyle policy making a profit on players. I can only remember making a real profit of one player in recent times. French bloke. Played up top. Who signed him?
Well we made a profit on Cahill, albeit a smaller one because we sold him late on.

I think the emphasis is on younger players.

Assuming CYL comes back big profit there if we want it.

Same with Mark Davies.

Coyle is trying to take it even further!
Hence the word real. Once you take out whatever we paid Villa for the clause plus any loyalty shit Cahill got as he went it's unlikely we actually made a profit. Not knocking his signing, Meggo's best, and breaking even isn't to be sniffed at, just saying for all the talk of young players sold for a profit, the only one that's likely to happen with is LCY (and he is out of contract next year) and it's unlikely to come close to the £7million 'short term Allardyce' got for Nico.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:59 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).

No issue with that.

I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....

I thought you said what Coyle was doing was being like a cancer in the club and completely destroying it?

now what he's doing will leave us stronger??
There is a difference between being angry after seeing us lose for the umpteenth time and assessing what a manager is trying to do.

He needs to keep us up. If he doesn't then he has destroyed all the good work done previously to keep this club in he premiership.

There are signs he may be learning, keep it up and I will be happy!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by thebish » Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:17 pm

is coyle making the club stronger - or is he a dreadful cancer killing the club?

you seem to be saying...

if it all turns to shit then I think he is a cancerous pox on the club
but then again...
if it all turns out ok then I think he is good for us and is making the club stronger


maybe politics is your future??

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38827
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:59 pm

thebish wrote:is coyle making the club stronger - or is he a dreadful cancer killing the club?

you seem to be saying...

if it all turns to shit then I think he is a cancerous pox on the club
but then again...
if it all turns out ok then I think he is good for us and is making the club stronger


maybe politics is your future??
What he's doing in the long term may make us stronger. But not if he pisses away the short term. Simples....

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by thebish » Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:18 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:is coyle making the club stronger - or is he a dreadful cancer killing the club?

you seem to be saying...

if it all turns to shit then I think he is a cancerous pox on the club
but then again...
if it all turns out ok then I think he is good for us and is making the club stronger


maybe politics is your future??
What he's doing in the long term may make us stronger. But not if he pisses away the short term. Simples....
you're still confusing me... you think he is good for the club and making it stronger - but you wanted him sacked and to never work in football again...

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!

Post by jaffka » Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:45 pm

Got to say that my head hurts in trying to work this out, in fact in sounds like somebody who is trying to edge their bets so that whatever happens they can post bollox about telling us all how they were right.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests