West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
BWFC_Insane wrote:
One thing I will give Coyle...


Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
You are Nixon!!!! I claim my tenner!Now perhaps Gartside is talking rubbish, but the fact is that Eddie Davies wasn't prepared to do whatever plan Allardyce had. And Gartside told me that they felt Allardyce was "bored" and didn't expect Bolton to go anywhere near what he wanted and was therefore just looking for an excuse for getting out.
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
This Megson and Coyle policy making a profit on players. I can only remember making a real profit of one player in recent times. French bloke. Played up top. Who signed him?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
imo, the lenth of the contacts given out by bolton to new signings is what kinda prevents us 'making most profit'.
ngog's being 3 year had me 'worried' straight away , due to remembering what happened with elmander going for nowt.
i'm not sure what the thinking behind it is. probably relegation fears (no!!!!).
the anelka contract (and the improvement) were one of the times they got it right. kinda luckily, considering he were "le sulk" previously at a few clubs.
ngog's being 3 year had me 'worried' straight away , due to remembering what happened with elmander going for nowt.
i'm not sure what the thinking behind it is. probably relegation fears (no!!!!).
the anelka contract (and the improvement) were one of the times they got it right. kinda luckily, considering he were "le sulk" previously at a few clubs.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
We signed Al Habsi for four years and made a profit. We might have signed Elmander for longer if he'd done something on the first two years we had him. Cahill was not a bad deal either - would have been nice to sign him longer but I don't think he wanted that. If we sell SKD to Sunderland for anything we've made a profit. Frankly it's all a gamble - long or short.a1 wrote:imo, the lenth of the contacts given out by bolton to new signings is what kinda prevents us 'making most profit'.
ngog's being 3 year had me 'worried' straight away , due to remembering what happened with elmander going for nowt.
i'm not sure what the thinking behind it is. probably relegation fears (no!!!!).
the anelka contract (and the improvement) were one of the times they got it right. kinda luckily, considering he were "le sulk" previously at a few clubs.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38827
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
Well we made a profit on Cahill, albeit a smaller one because we sold him late on.Prufrock wrote:This Megson and Coyle policy making a profit on players. I can only remember making a real profit of one player in recent times. French bloke. Played up top. Who signed him?
I think the emphasis is on younger players.
Assuming CYL comes back big profit there if we want it.
Same with Mark Davies.
Coyle is trying to take it even further!
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
An even smaller profit when you deduct Aston Villa's cut.
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
We bought that clause out
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
I stand corrected. How much did it cost us to buy it out?boltonboris wrote:We bought that clause out

God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38827
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).
No issue with that.
I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
No issue with that.
I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
5 games on and your now a "Coyle man" Bah! I knew you were Nixon testing the waters all along!BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).
No issue with that.
I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
I can't remember. The figure I have in my head was about £700k. But it seems high. I can't remember if the percentage agreement was his sale price, or profit of sale price. I hope it was the former..... Otherwise, money wasted!Zulus Thousand of em wrote:I stand corrected. How much did it cost us to buy it out?boltonboris wrote:We bought that clause out
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38827
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
Not at all. But you have to judge a siuation in its fullest.Hoboh wrote:5 games on and your now a "Coyle man" Bah! I knew you were Nixon testing the waters all along!BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).
No issue with that.
I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
If he gets results like Liverpool and continues to improve our youth setup, then thats good. He must keep us up for me and seeing as he's not going to be sacked thats how I'll judge him!
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).
No issue with that.
I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
I thought you said what Coyle was doing was being like a cancer in the club and completely destroying it?
now what he's doing will leave us stronger??
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
Hence the word real. Once you take out whatever we paid Villa for the clause plus any loyalty shit Cahill got as he went it's unlikely we actually made a profit. Not knocking his signing, Meggo's best, and breaking even isn't to be sniffed at, just saying for all the talk of young players sold for a profit, the only one that's likely to happen with is LCY (and he is out of contract next year) and it's unlikely to come close to the £7million 'short term Allardyce' got for Nico.BWFC_Insane wrote:Well we made a profit on Cahill, albeit a smaller one because we sold him late on.Prufrock wrote:This Megson and Coyle policy making a profit on players. I can only remember making a real profit of one player in recent times. French bloke. Played up top. Who signed him?
I think the emphasis is on younger players.
Assuming CYL comes back big profit there if we want it.
Same with Mark Davies.
Coyle is trying to take it even further!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38827
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
There is a difference between being angry after seeing us lose for the umpteenth time and assessing what a manager is trying to do.thebish wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:I think the strength of the club were Allardyce and his specialist basckroom team. When he walked out with that team, he didn't leave a lot, barring Anelka. No discernable youth set up, not a crop of accquired young players coming through, not even a mentality or playing style (e.g. that Swansea have carried on through multiple managers).
No issue with that.
I think what Coyle is doing will, if he can get the here and now right, and the longer term is managed and structured properly leave us stronger and not reliant on one manager etc....in theory at least. I think Eddie Davies made that a big priority after learning the lessons when Allardyce left. Thing is you have to get the here and now right for all the future stuff to eventually pay off....
I thought you said what Coyle was doing was being like a cancer in the club and completely destroying it?
now what he's doing will leave us stronger??
He needs to keep us up. If he doesn't then he has destroyed all the good work done previously to keep this club in he premiership.
There are signs he may be learning, keep it up and I will be happy!
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
is coyle making the club stronger - or is he a dreadful cancer killing the club?
you seem to be saying...
if it all turns to shit then I think he is a cancerous pox on the club
but then again...
if it all turns out ok then I think he is good for us and is making the club stronger
maybe politics is your future??
you seem to be saying...
if it all turns to shit then I think he is a cancerous pox on the club
but then again...
if it all turns out ok then I think he is good for us and is making the club stronger
maybe politics is your future??
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38827
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
What he's doing in the long term may make us stronger. But not if he pisses away the short term. Simples....thebish wrote:is coyle making the club stronger - or is he a dreadful cancer killing the club?
you seem to be saying...
if it all turns to shit then I think he is a cancerous pox on the club
but then again...
if it all turns out ok then I think he is good for us and is making the club stronger
maybe politics is your future??
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
you're still confusing me... you think he is good for the club and making it stronger - but you wanted him sacked and to never work in football again...BWFC_Insane wrote:What he's doing in the long term may make us stronger. But not if he pisses away the short term. Simples....thebish wrote:is coyle making the club stronger - or is he a dreadful cancer killing the club?
you seem to be saying...
if it all turns to shit then I think he is a cancerous pox on the club
but then again...
if it all turns out ok then I think he is good for us and is making the club stronger
maybe politics is your future??
Re: West Ham are complete failures! Let's all laugh at 'em!
Got to say that my head hurts in trying to work this out, in fact in sounds like somebody who is trying to edge their bets so that whatever happens they can post bollox about telling us all how they were right.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests