Republic Of Ireland v France
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
No, he didn't.H. Pedersen wrote:Wouldn't have made a difference anyway. After the infamous Samuel tackle, didn't Ronaldo tell Styles it wasn't a penalty?Prufrock wrote:I can understand folk being angry with Henry, but what is he going to do? It isn't his call to make, and with his country on the verge of qualifying he isn't going to turn around and say yeah I handballed it, that's if he knew it was as blatant as it was.
But don't let that stop you.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
He didnt roll around screaming which is as good as.Puskas wrote:No, he didn't.H. Pedersen wrote:Wouldn't have made a difference anyway. After the infamous Samuel tackle, didn't Ronaldo tell Styles it wasn't a penalty?Prufrock wrote:I can understand folk being angry with Henry, but what is he going to do? It isn't his call to make, and with his country on the verge of qualifying he isn't going to turn around and say yeah I handballed it, that's if he knew it was as blatant as it was.
But don't let that stop you.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Couple of things here:
Firstly, a part of me feels sympathy for any team that loses any game, nevermind one of such importance, to a blatent cheat. That being said, my partisan side has no sympathy those ROI fans who were the first to rejoice in the "Hand of God "incident and our none qualification for Euro 2008. I'm English, we're in, so I couldn't give a shit.
Secondly, I'm sure there will be calls for the video review system again after this. I can't ever see that happening. I find it hard to believe that no official saw Henry remove the lace from the ball before crossing it. Would an extra liner on each side help? I suppose we have to rely on some after game punishment system or better still some honesty from players. Can't see that happening. Not good for the game.
Firstly, a part of me feels sympathy for any team that loses any game, nevermind one of such importance, to a blatent cheat. That being said, my partisan side has no sympathy those ROI fans who were the first to rejoice in the "Hand of God "incident and our none qualification for Euro 2008. I'm English, we're in, so I couldn't give a shit.
Secondly, I'm sure there will be calls for the video review system again after this. I can't ever see that happening. I find it hard to believe that no official saw Henry remove the lace from the ball before crossing it. Would an extra liner on each side help? I suppose we have to rely on some after game punishment system or better still some honesty from players. Can't see that happening. Not good for the game.
I think if anything, it reinforces this two extra officials jobby they are trialling in the Europa league. They would have spotted it.Wandering Willy wrote:Couple of things here:
Firstly, a part of me feels sympathy for any team that loses any game, nevermind one of such importance, to a blatent cheat. That being said, my partisan side has no sympathy those ROI fans who were the first to rejoice in the "Hand of God "incident and our none qualification for Euro 2008. I'm English, we're in, so I couldn't give a shit.
Secondly, I'm sure there will be calls for the video review system again after this. I can't ever see that happening. I find it hard to believe that no official saw Henry remove the lace from the ball before crossing it. Would an extra liner on each side help? I suppose we have to rely on some after game punishment system or better still some honesty from players. Can't see that happening. Not good for the game.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
I wasn't aware of this. Is it 2 liners per side?Prufrock wrote:I think if anything, it reinforces this two extra officials jobby they are trialling in the Europa league. They would have spotted it.Wandering Willy wrote:Couple of things here:
Firstly, a part of me feels sympathy for any team that loses any game, nevermind one of such importance, to a blatent cheat. That being said, my partisan side has no sympathy those ROI fans who were the first to rejoice in the "Hand of God "incident and our none qualification for Euro 2008. I'm English, we're in, so I couldn't give a shit.
Secondly, I'm sure there will be calls for the video review system again after this. I can't ever see that happening. I find it hard to believe that no official saw Henry remove the lace from the ball before crossing it. Would an extra liner on each side help? I suppose we have to rely on some after game punishment system or better still some honesty from players. Can't see that happening. Not good for the game.
Extra one in each penalty area. I think the idea is they run up and down the 18 yard line opposite to the linesman's side.Wandering Willy wrote:I wasn't aware of this. Is it 2 liners per side?Prufrock wrote:I think if anything, it reinforces this two extra officials jobby they are trialling in the Europa league. They would have spotted it.Wandering Willy wrote:Couple of things here:
Firstly, a part of me feels sympathy for any team that loses any game, nevermind one of such importance, to a blatent cheat. That being said, my partisan side has no sympathy those ROI fans who were the first to rejoice in the "Hand of God "incident and our none qualification for Euro 2008. I'm English, we're in, so I couldn't give a shit.
Secondly, I'm sure there will be calls for the video review system again after this. I can't ever see that happening. I find it hard to believe that no official saw Henry remove the lace from the ball before crossing it. Would an extra liner on each side help? I suppose we have to rely on some after game punishment system or better still some honesty from players. Can't see that happening. Not good for the game.
http://www.epltalk.com/five-referees-at ... -game/8077
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Thanks for that Pru. I am reading that to be an extra official behind the goal to monitor the box. I like it. My concern with 2 linesman per side was that one could flag for offside in a tight decision and one wouldn't leading to uproar from fans and players. Hopefully it will reduce diving in the box (red card offense for me).Prufrock wrote:Extra one in each penalty area. I think the idea is they run up and down the 18 yard line opposite to the linesman's side.Wandering Willy wrote:I wasn't aware of this. Is it 2 liners per side?Prufrock wrote:I think if anything, it reinforces this two extra officials jobby they are trialling in the Europa league. They would have spotted it.Wandering Willy wrote:Couple of things here:
Firstly, a part of me feels sympathy for any team that loses any game, nevermind one of such importance, to a blatent cheat. That being said, my partisan side has no sympathy those ROI fans who were the first to rejoice in the "Hand of God "incident and our none qualification for Euro 2008. I'm English, we're in, so I couldn't give a shit.
Secondly, I'm sure there will be calls for the video review system again after this. I can't ever see that happening. I find it hard to believe that no official saw Henry remove the lace from the ball before crossing it. Would an extra liner on each side help? I suppose we have to rely on some after game punishment system or better still some honesty from players. Can't see that happening. Not good for the game.
http://www.epltalk.com/five-referees-at ... -game/8077
I think they run around behind the goal but I'm pretty, almost 100% sure they are allowed on the pitch, up to the 18 yard line. How it works in practise I am not sure. Yeah, you can't really have two linos trying to give the same decision. I think the reasons they are there are did it cross the line jobbies, and for diving and penalties.Wandering Willy wrote:Thanks for that Pru. I am reading that to be an extra official behind the goal to monitor the box. I like it. My concern with 2 linesman per side was that one could flag for offside in a tight decision and one wouldn't leading to uproar from fans and players. Hopefully it will reduce diving in the box (red card offense for me).Prufrock wrote:Extra one in each penalty area. I think the idea is they run up and down the 18 yard line opposite to the linesman's side.Wandering Willy wrote:I wasn't aware of this. Is it 2 liners per side?Prufrock wrote:I think if anything, it reinforces this two extra officials jobby they are trialling in the Europa league. They would have spotted it.Wandering Willy wrote:Couple of things here:
Firstly, a part of me feels sympathy for any team that loses any game, nevermind one of such importance, to a blatent cheat. That being said, my partisan side has no sympathy those ROI fans who were the first to rejoice in the "Hand of God "incident and our none qualification for Euro 2008. I'm English, we're in, so I couldn't give a shit.
Secondly, I'm sure there will be calls for the video review system again after this. I can't ever see that happening. I find it hard to believe that no official saw Henry remove the lace from the ball before crossing it. Would an extra liner on each side help? I suppose we have to rely on some after game punishment system or better still some honesty from players. Can't see that happening. Not good for the game.
http://www.epltalk.com/five-referees-at ... -game/8077
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
According to Henry, he did.H. Pedersen wrote:Wouldn't have made a difference anyway. After the infamous Samuel tackle, didn't Ronaldo tell Styles it wasn't a penalty? FIFA and UEFA have so artificially boosted the referee's egos that had Henry said "I handballed it," the ref probably would have booked him for dissent.Prufrock wrote:I can understand folk being angry with Henry, but what is he going to do? It isn't his call to make, and with his country on the verge of qualifying he isn't going to turn around and say yeah I handballed it, that's if he knew it was as blatant as it was.
Of course, I'm not entirely sure when he said it. As soon as Gallas nodded it in he was off celebrating like he'd won the World Cup, so it wasn't then. If he tells the referee 5 minutes later, whats the ref supposed to do then? Reverse time?Le Cheat wrote:“I told the referree, but he said ‘you are not the ref ’,”
At a guess, he probably did own up, but after it was far too late, which makes him look good. Incidentally he appears to be doing the exact same thing with the whole "Ireland deserve a replay" thing. Not a chance of changing anything, but it makes him look less of a bastard.
Who the feck are the mental mental people who want to become referees?! I'm not sure how it is Maradona-esque either, he jumped up and 100% clearly punched it in. I have no idea how the officials missed the Maradona one. This one I can see. It hits Henry's hand, it's a definite foul and the Irish are very hard done to. Beyond that... I'm not sure how Henry is a 'disgrace' either. French commentary was interesting, the first replay the commentator just says, 'degueulasse', which means 'disgusting'.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
FIFA have already said that the replay would never happen. Ref's decision is final as it should be or we would have a never ending series of replay demands.Tombwfc wrote:According to Henry, he did.H. Pedersen wrote:Wouldn't have made a difference anyway. After the infamous Samuel tackle, didn't Ronaldo tell Styles it wasn't a penalty? FIFA and UEFA have so artificially boosted the referee's egos that had Henry said "I handballed it," the ref probably would have booked him for dissent.Prufrock wrote:I can understand folk being angry with Henry, but what is he going to do? It isn't his call to make, and with his country on the verge of qualifying he isn't going to turn around and say yeah I handballed it, that's if he knew it was as blatant as it was.
Of course, I'm not entirely sure when he said it. As soon as Gallas nodded it in he was off celebrating like he'd won the World Cup, so it wasn't then. If he tells the referee 5 minutes later, whats the ref supposed to do then? Reverse time?Le Cheat wrote:“I told the referree, but he said ‘you are not the ref ’,”
At a guess, he probably did own up, but after it was far too late, which makes him look good. Incidentally he appears to be doing the exact same thing with the whole "Ireland deserve a replay" thing. Not a chance of changing anything, but it makes him look less of a bastard.
Of course, if Henry was such a sportsman he could lead the calls for France to withdraw from the World Cup giving ROI a place by default (assumption). That bastion of fair play Platini could back him up.
i think the problem I have with Terry Tiny Tears is his association with Arsenal and Wenger and a difficult-to-put-into-words air of the "we are special - we are different to other football players - we play the pure right way - we are beyong criticism" etc.. and then it turns out he is (and always has been) just as much an instinctive cheating fecker as anyone else.
it's not so much the deed - it was the previous moral highground that irritates me...
it's not so much the deed - it was the previous moral highground that irritates me...
The second contact is what turns it from being accidental into being more deliberate IMO (albeit not on the scale of punching the fecking thing into the net).Prufrock wrote:Who the feck are the mental mental people who want to become referees?! I'm not sure how it is Maradona-esque either, he jumped up and 100% clearly punched it in. I have no idea how the officials missed the Maradona one. This one I can see. It hits Henry's hand, it's a definite foul and the Irish are very hard done to. Beyond that... I'm not sure how Henry is a 'disgrace' either. French commentary was interesting, the first replay the commentator just says, 'degueulasse', which means 'disgusting'.
I can see why the ref and lino missed it, and I can see why Henry did it and didn't own up straight away. It is still cheating though, and so I think he warrants his status as a 'disgrace'. I think it's a small price to pay for unfairly ensuring that you get to play in one last World Cup, while many of the Irish won't.
While it'll never happen, I do think it would be a great thing for football if France did offer to replay the game. They'd look like the saviours of all that's good and proper about football, and if they turned up at all they'd have enough beat the Irish.
As an aside, I thought Trappatoni made an interesting observation in amongst all this. In two legged games that end level, is it not unfair that whoever hosts the second leg gets an extra half hour at home?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Still not heard a peep anywhere from Platini...strange that - he's usually got lots to say for himself.Wandering Willy wrote:FIFA have already said that the replay would never happen. Ref's decision is final as it should be or we would have a never ending series of replay demands.Tombwfc wrote:According to Henry, he did.H. Pedersen wrote:Wouldn't have made a difference anyway. After the infamous Samuel tackle, didn't Ronaldo tell Styles it wasn't a penalty? FIFA and UEFA have so artificially boosted the referee's egos that had Henry said "I handballed it," the ref probably would have booked him for dissent.Prufrock wrote:I can understand folk being angry with Henry, but what is he going to do? It isn't his call to make, and with his country on the verge of qualifying he isn't going to turn around and say yeah I handballed it, that's if he knew it was as blatant as it was.
Of course, I'm not entirely sure when he said it. As soon as Gallas nodded it in he was off celebrating like he'd won the World Cup, so it wasn't then. If he tells the referee 5 minutes later, whats the ref supposed to do then? Reverse time?Le Cheat wrote:“I told the referree, but he said ‘you are not the ref ’,”
At a guess, he probably did own up, but after it was far too late, which makes him look good. Incidentally he appears to be doing the exact same thing with the whole "Ireland deserve a replay" thing. Not a chance of changing anything, but it makes him look less of a bastard.
Of course, if Henry was such a sportsman he could lead the calls for France to withdraw from the World Cup giving ROI a place by default (assumption). That bastion of fair play Platini could back him up.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1713
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:53 pm
I don't get some of the media comments about this. Everyone is saying the "Irish were robbed of a place in the world cup". They weren't - they were robbed of staying level on aggregate with 15 minutes to go. Given France were pushing forward more at that time, it was 50-50 at best that they would have won from there. Also, Anelka's penalty looked nailed on to me - the referee/assistant made two major mistakes to me, one for France and one against them.
I don't think the game should be replayed, I don't think Henry is a cheat, although it was a regrettable incident, I do think the officials made desperate errors, but it is not easy running miles at the age of 40, and then retaining mental sharpness to see incidents in a blink of an eye.
They should definitely introduce more assistant referees behind the goal, but I am against video technology except for balls over the line incidents. Football depends on continuity of action, we don't want a 10 second delay for a replay (plus time to assess the replay) over every contentious decision, of which there are many each game.
I don't think the game should be replayed, I don't think Henry is a cheat, although it was a regrettable incident, I do think the officials made desperate errors, but it is not easy running miles at the age of 40, and then retaining mental sharpness to see incidents in a blink of an eye.
They should definitely introduce more assistant referees behind the goal, but I am against video technology except for balls over the line incidents. Football depends on continuity of action, we don't want a 10 second delay for a replay (plus time to assess the replay) over every contentious decision, of which there are many each game.
Last edited by bristol_Wanderer3 on Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
And at least Roy Keane seems sympathetic towards their plight.Zulus Thousand of em wrote:That's because his plan has come together very nicely.Worthy4England wrote:
Still not heard a peep anywhere from Platini...strange that - he's usually got lots to say for himself.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 370327.stm

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests