Hughes For City???
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:32 pm
Just heard of the BBC that Blackburn have let Hughes speak to City over the job?!
Will Blackburn go downhill after he leaves??
Will Blackburn go downhill after he leaves??
The Wanderer, A Bolton Wanderers (BWFC) Forum. This message board is part of the main site.
https://the-wanderer.co.uk/
It all depends who they get in if Hughes does go to city.The-Wanderer wrote:Just heard of the BBC that Blackburn have let Hughes speak to City over the job?!
Will Blackburn go downhill after he leaves??
One Blackburn Rovers player with more interest than most in Manchester City's pursuit of Mark Hughes must be David Bentley.
The winger is believed to be keen on leaving Blackburn - something which he apparently has in common with Hughes after the club confirmed this morning that 'Mark has made it clear to the board he would like the opportunity to talk to Manchester City'.
Yet Hughes has not been so keen on allowing Bentley to talk to potential suitors, repeatedly warning the likes of Liverpool and Chelsea that, as the player is under contract, he won't be leaving.
"David Bentley has a good contract here and there is good length on that contract, so we don't have to sell. Players are employed, they are under contract, and the decision on whether or not they see out the length of their contract doesn't depend on them - it depends on me or the chairman," the Rovers boss maintained.
In other words, contracts should be both adhered to and respected.
Strangely, however, Hughes' doesn't seem to believe that this principle applies to himself - in case he has forgotten, it was only in November that he signed a deal that, in the words of The Times, would 'keep him at Blackburn Rovers until 2010'.
I'd rather them struggle more than we did this year....that would mean one of the bottom four places would be filled up....jaffka wrote:I would like to see him go, the sixfingers to appoint Dean Saunders to keep continuity and them to struggle and suffer like we did this year.
Yep - it's on Skysports website now....Son of Jardel wrote:Just saw on Sky Sports News that Sam Allardyce has "cut short a family holiday" to join the race for the Blackburn job. Surely he can't go to Blackburn!
Incidentally, this is the same family he quit Bolton to spend more time with before joining Newcastle a week or two later. He certainly isn't a family man!
thats gonna cause some shite when him and freddy and their mates buy bwfc.Worthy4England wrote:
Meanwhile, with Hughes seemingly set to leave Ewood Park, former Bolton Wanderers boss Sam Allardyce has emerged as a contender for the Blackburn job.
Allardyce has cut short a family holiday in Spain to return to the North West, but could also be in the running for the City vacancy, if Hughes goes to Chelsea.
I think it'll be ok, us and Blackburn have a long tradition of being friends....He might end up at Citeh yet if Chelski nip in for Hughes...a1 wrote:thats gonna cause some shite when him and freddy and their mates buy bwfc.Worthy4England wrote:
Meanwhile, with Hughes seemingly set to leave Ewood Park, former Bolton Wanderers boss Sam Allardyce has emerged as a contender for the Blackburn job.
Allardyce has cut short a family holiday in Spain to return to the North West, but could also be in the running for the City vacancy, if Hughes goes to Chelsea.
owner of bolton , manager of blackburn ? he'll be shifting players backwards and frontwards between us and them quicker than you can say "course he'll help me , he's me dad.. "
Summat like that...we give them Frandsen in the prime of his career, they give us Matt JansenWorthy4England wrote:I think it'll be ok, us and Blackburn have a long tradition of being friends
You think he'd last two years at city if he only managed a minor miracle?!communistworkethic wrote:Citeh is the better job for him, he'll work a minor miracle, Taxman Shittywanker will sack him off after 2 years and Sir Alex will step down, leaving the Manure job for him.
Decent comp when he gets sacked after a year, then.superjohnmcginlay wrote:Done deal says back of t'Sun. 3 year deal for £9m.
Bottom line is, the buck stops with the Manager - whatever goes on in between. Glad to see we now understand what a Manager is "responsible" for.Mark Hughes wrote: "There is always pressure," Hughes told a press conference live on Sky Sports News. "Every Premier League manager is under pressure.
"It is a result driven business and results are based on decisions I make. It doesn't faze me and you have to thrive on it.
Criticism
"Fans of any football club will voice opinions if you are not successful and if the team is not performing you are open to criticism.
"But I'll back my ability against most managers. In the next three years I would expect to be successful."
eh?Worthy4England wrote: Bottom line is, the buck stops with the Manager - whatever goes on in between. Glad to see we now understand what a Manager is "responsible" for.
It's a statement I happen to agree with about Managers in general. In football terms, they're responsible for our points tally - how they go about it is up to them (unless, like at Citeh, you have Frank trying to make your signings). For this season, Megson deserves plenty of credit for managing a team that ultimately survived. 5/6 games out, when it looked like we might be heading for days out in Blackpool and Derby, there were plenty of people saying that it wasn't Megson's fault, it was mainly Allardyce's team with some Sammy Lee signings. The players attitudes were crap etc. etc. all of which I agree with, but none of which alters the fact that the buck stops with the Manager. He knew all that when he accepted the pay check.a1 wrote:eh?Worthy4England wrote: Bottom line is, the buck stops with the Manager - whatever goes on in between. Glad to see we now understand what a Manager is "responsible" for.
megson kept us up , so its all down to him ?
not too sure the mugson out charlies will like that interpretation of it.
bit like their "if we stay up its coz of the players and in spite of megson , but if we go down its megsons fault" spiel , but totally opposite.
using what hughes says as some sort of "catch all" definitive answer to the success of a football club is wierd.
not too sure what you mean , youre either using what he says as a pre-emptive anti-megson device .
or
hoping hughes falls on his face
or
or using it in defence of megson .
i'm not sure what you mean. i think mainly its the first one.