Page 4 of 8

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:05 pm
by bobo the clown
He's buggered if they lose to Burnley in't fizzy-pop cup.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:08 pm
by jaffka
bobo the clown wrote:He's buggered if they lose to Burnley in't fizzy-pop cup.
I think he will be quite safe as Burnley have gone through and Blackburn were knocked out tonight.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:11 pm
by William the White
jaffka wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:He's buggered if they lose to Burnley in't fizzy-pop cup.
I think he will be quite safe as Burnley have gone through and Blackburn were knocked out tonight.
:lol:

Betcha Burnley going thru and blackburn going out doesn't make him safe.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:18 pm
by jaffka
William the White wrote:
jaffka wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:He's buggered if they lose to Burnley in't fizzy-pop cup.
I think he will be quite safe as Burnley have gone through and Blackburn were knocked out tonight.
:lol:

Betcha Burnley going thru and blackburn going out doesn't make him safe.
I think that they are going to stick with him, the squad is aging and Turner Jacks money has gone now, they really are team punching above their weight, just happened to strike luck with Santa Cruz, which was apparently one of those free transfers that no longer exists!

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:29 pm
by hisroyalgingerness
Can you imagine if they had got through and played Burnley in the two-legged semis. That'd be two riots

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:27 pm
by William the White
hisroyalgingerness wrote:Can you imagine if they had got through and played Burnley in the two-legged semis. That'd be two riots
Which could hae severely damaged two such picturesque towns...

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:31 pm
by Prufrock
jaffka wrote:
William the White wrote:
jaffka wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:He's buggered if they lose to Burnley in't fizzy-pop cup.
I think he will be quite safe as Burnley have gone through and Blackburn were knocked out tonight.
:lol:

Betcha Burnley going thru and blackburn going out doesn't make him safe.
I think that they are going to stick with him, the squad is aging and Turner Jacks money has gone now, they really are team punching above their weight, just happened to strike luck with Santa Cruz, which was apparently one of those free transfers that no longer exists!
You mean a free transfer costing 3.5 million quid? sort of like the money we HAVE been paying for players since the market which has dried up dried up?

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:13 pm
by jaffka
Prufrock wrote:
jaffka wrote:
William the White wrote:
jaffka wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:He's buggered if they lose to Burnley in't fizzy-pop cup.
I think he will be quite safe as Burnley have gone through and Blackburn were knocked out tonight.
:lol:

Betcha Burnley going thru and blackburn going out doesn't make him safe.
I think that they are going to stick with him, the squad is aging and Turner Jacks money has gone now, they really are team punching above their weight, just happened to strike luck with Santa Cruz, which was apparently one of those free transfers that no longer exists!
You mean a free transfer costing 3.5 million quid? sort of like the money we HAVE been paying for players since the market which has dried up dried up?
I would have liked to have seen him come to the Reebok

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:20 pm
by jaffka
There is a rumour circulating that Ince will be sacked on monday or tuesday.

The inbreds want Big Sam and are acting now to compete with Sunderland.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:34 pm
by Leyther_Matt
jaffka wrote:The inbreds want Big Sam and are acting now to compete with Sunderland.
The club or the fans? Seem to remember he was a front runner before they appointed Ince, but he was edged out because the Bolton connection meant he was unpopular with fans (in fairness, if the boot were on t'other foot, then I wouldn't want Souness).

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:21 pm
by bobo the clown
Leyther_Matt wrote:
jaffka wrote:The inbreds want Big Sam and are acting now to compete with Sunderland.
The club or the fans? Seem to remember he was a front runner before they appointed Ince, but he was edged out because the Bolton connection meant he was unpopular with fans (in fairness, if the boot were on t'other foot, then I wouldn't want Souness).
Yes, but that's because he's an odourous knob !!

Ah ... seeing your point, now.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:45 pm
by superjohnmcginlay
http://www.brfcs.co.uk/mb/index.php?s=0 ... opic=20340

Dingles getting rather upset about some Mirror bloke.

Mirror fella seems to be forgetting that Ince is proving to be a bit shite.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:16 pm
by Tombwfc
I like Holt, but he's talking bollocks.

The Inbreds don't dislike Ince because he's black, they don't like him because he's fecking shite.

Really, Ince is being treated like Keegan in Geordieland compared to the way Megson gets treated here.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:36 pm
by jaffka
There could well be an element of racism in this though.

There were'nt many black players signed by Rovers when Walker was at the helm.

Now he has gone, the trustees enact on his wishes.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:40 pm
by Tombwfc
jaffka wrote:There could well be an element of racism in this though.

There were'nt many black players signed by Rovers when Walker was at the helm.

Now he has gone, the trustees enact on his wishes.
Which would involve appointing a black manager, signing Robbie Fowler and Keith Andrews behind his back and making the side play shite so that they can then sack him?

Seems a pretty complicated plan for these racist football club owners to undertake. Not least because it could end up costing them £30mil.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:45 pm
by Lord Kangana
So thats this weeks excuse, anyway. I thought last week they were all out to get him because they were jealous of him being an ex-rag, and previous to that because he wasn't a big name. I don't like Megson, but I can assure you its nothing to do with his gingerness.

Besides, Oliver Holt is on a par with Alan Green, Clive Tyldesley,Johnathan Pearce, Steve Claridge etc. I wish people like that would learn that they are a minor flea on the arse of the beautiful game, especially when they use their ill-deserved free entry to pontificate to the rest of us.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:23 pm
by jaffka
Tombwfc wrote:
jaffka wrote:There could well be an element of racism in this though.

There were'nt many black players signed by Rovers when Walker was at the helm.

Now he has gone, the trustees enact on his wishes.
Which would involve appointing a black manager, signing Robbie Fowler and Keith Andrews behind his back and making the side play shite so that they can then sack him?

Seems a pretty complicated plan for these racist football club owners to undertake. Not least because it could end up costing them £30mil.
The trustees are there to manage Walkers fund.

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:44 pm
by communistworkethic
yeah, manage the fund, not burn crosses and wear pointy hats and sheets

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:55 pm
by communistworkethic
superjohnmcginlay wrote:http://www.brfcs.co.uk/mb/index.php?s=0 ... opic=20340

Dingles getting rather upset about some Mirror bloke.

Mirror fella seems to be forgetting that Ince is proving to be a bit shite.
Oliver Holt has recently had a pop at people using message boards having a racsit attitude towards Paul Ince. This tells me that he has been coming onto this board to read posts. BUT I have never ever seen anything posted on here with regards to the colour of Paul Ince's skin.
eh?? contradictory?

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:07 am
by Prufrock
communistworkethic wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:http://www.brfcs.co.uk/mb/index.php?s=0 ... opic=20340

Dingles getting rather upset about some Mirror bloke.

Mirror fella seems to be forgetting that Ince is proving to be a bit shite.
Oliver Holt has recently had a pop at people using message boards having a racsit attitude towards Paul Ince. This tells me that he has been coming onto this board to read posts. BUT I have never ever seen anything posted on here with regards to the colour of Paul Ince's skin.
eh?? contradictory?
All that syphillis and inbreeding, fecks with the mind. As for the racsim thing, meh theres no doubt there is something keeping black managers from getting jobs, whether thats racism, a lack of role models, the fact that there arent many black ex footballers over 35/40, whatever reason, and perhaps a conbination of a few. However to suggest the majority of stick Ince is getting is coz he's black is ridiculous. Its coz he's WANK! No doubt the odd one or two will have a problem with the race, but you get mindless idiots everywhere, seems a bit unfair to pick on the dingles.

THere was one ludicrous statement on that thread though,
thenodrog wrote: Proof of the pudding ...... Its an absolutely impossible arguement against a team that won the Prem. That was done on merit over a season and had sweet FA to do with skin colour.
The traunch of black players toward the end of the JW era however hardly provides an argument that the black players brought much to the party though. Blake, Dahlin, Yorke and Cole are not remembered for their superb team spirit and work ethic are they?