Murderers at it again
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Murderers at it again
Have Liverpool FC no shame?
Have they no respect?
Who the fcuk do they think that are?
One of 'theirs' is guilty of a terrible crime and they once again trot out some second rate celeb to tell all and sundry this scum should be released
It doesn't surprise me anymore, but it makes my blood boil
Disgusting
Have they no respect?
Who the fcuk do they think that are?
One of 'theirs' is guilty of a terrible crime and they once again trot out some second rate celeb to tell all and sundry this scum should be released
It doesn't surprise me anymore, but it makes my blood boil
Disgusting
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:09 am
- Location: Enfield.....Duh!
Re: Murderers at it again
CAPSLOCK wrote:Have Liverpool FC no shame?
Have they no respect?
Who the fcuk do they think that are?
One of 'theirs' is guilty of a terrible crime and they once again trot out some second rate celeb to tell all and sundry this scum should be released
It doesn't surprise me anymore, but it makes my blood boil
Disgusting
What!??
"You're Gemini, and I don't know which one I like the most!"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Mosaic ?!?!?! What tune ??CAPSLOCK wrote:Oh, just some Free Shields bollocks on the pitch pre match, then this poxy 'mosaic' effort
Nowt much in the scheme of things, unless you feel that we ought to respect the rule of law
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Something to do with Michael Shields. I'd like just for one moment, for all the hand wringing to stop, and just one person to say, what about the guy who allegedly admitted it, standing up and doing the decent thing.spraggy wrote:Sorry, what are you on about?
But of course that would go against everything that Scousers stand for, and it's a coin toss whether it was all a ruse in the first place.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
As I read it the alleged confession did not bear out the facts and was, in any case, retracted.Lord Kangana wrote:So if someone else admitted to doing it, help me out as to why they shouldn't ask for the release of the person who's doing the time for it, quite possibly wrongly?
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: Murderers at it again
I think you should ask yourself if you have no shame.CAPSLOCK wrote:Have Liverpool FC no shame?
Have they no respect?
Who the fcuk do they think that are?
One of 'theirs' is guilty of a terrible crime and they once again trot out some second rate celeb to tell all and sundry this scum should be released
It doesn't surprise me anymore, but it makes my blood boil
Disgusting
It is almost certain michael shields is innocent of the crime - in fact was in bed asleep at the time it happened.
it is almost certain that the bulgarian police in their determination to get someone - anyone - for the crime framed him...
It is almost certain that the real perpetrator is the man that admitted it, then retracted that admission when he realised he'd have to serve time - and in bulgaria...
it is almost certain that this could have happened in Bulgaria to an innocent bolton fan, but for fortune...
and, if it had, I would hope BW fans would turn out in support of him or her...
Well done to the Scouse fans... and shame on any of us gloating about an innocent football fan spending more than 1000 days behind bars for a crime he didn't commit...
a withdrawal, CAPSLOCK, would be in order, i feel...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
Re: Murderers at it again
it's 'almost certain' on what basis?William the White wrote:I think you should ask yourself if you have no shame.CAPSLOCK wrote:Have Liverpool FC no shame?
Have they no respect?
Who the fcuk do they think that are?
One of 'theirs' is guilty of a terrible crime and they once again trot out some second rate celeb to tell all and sundry this scum should be released
It doesn't surprise me anymore, but it makes my blood boil
Disgusting
It is almost certain michael shields is innocent of the crime - in fact was in bed asleep at the time it happened.
it is almost certain that the bulgarian police in their determination to get someone - anyone - for the crime framed him...
It is almost certain that the real perpetrator is the man that admitted it, then retracted that admission when he realised he'd have to serve time - and in bulgaria...
it is almost certain that this could have happened in Bulgaria to an innocent bolton fan, but for fortune...
and, if it had, I would hope BW fans would turn out in support of him or her...
Well done to the Scouse fans... and shame on any of us gloating about an innocent football fan spending more than 1000 days behind bars for a crime he didn't commit...
a withdrawal, CAPSLOCK, would be in order, i feel...
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
Re: Murderers at it again
No withdrawalWilliam the White wrote:I think you should ask yourself if you have no shame.CAPSLOCK wrote:Have Liverpool FC no shame?
Have they no respect?
Who the fcuk do they think that are?
One of 'theirs' is guilty of a terrible crime and they once again trot out some second rate celeb to tell all and sundry this scum should be released
It doesn't surprise me anymore, but it makes my blood boil
Disgusting
It is almost certain michael shields is innocent of the crime - in fact was in bed asleep at the time it happened.
it is almost certain that the bulgarian police in their determination to get someone - anyone - for the crime framed him...
It is almost certain that the real perpetrator is the man that admitted it, then retracted that admission when he realised he'd have to serve time - and in bulgaria...
it is almost certain that this could have happened in Bulgaria to an innocent bolton fan, but for fortune...
and, if it had, I would hope BW fans would turn out in support of him or her...
Well done to the Scouse fans... and shame on any of us gloating about an innocent football fan spending more than 1000 days behind bars for a crime he didn't commit...
a withdrawal, CAPSLOCK, would be in order, i feel...
Owt I've seen makes him as likely as any other
ps I'm not gloating
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Ok - to CWE - I'm almost certain because another man - graham sankey - with a criminal record admitted his guilt. this was the first man arrested by the bulgarian police, then released.
they went to rearrest him to find that he'd checked out of the hotel. so they went to another room, where michael shields was asleep, and arrested him...
this hardly seems like a convincing investigation. it does seem like a determination to get a body at all costs... This is not unknown in the police world, including, alas, the UK police world - birmingham 6, guildford 4, etc...
the testimony of other liverpool fans that offer shields an alibi is supportive...
the repeated fingering of sankey by other fans is circumstailly supportive...
the identification procedures involved a 'parade' where shields was the only englishman, where he had been dressed in a white t-shirt not his own, where he had been held handcuffed in full view in the police station for up to four hours beforehand...
i'd be interested if any of our law students on this forum could comment on these procedures... but it looks like a frame to me...
To CAPS... He seems 'as likely as any other' seems a weakening of some major order from your original post... 'guilty of a terrible crime...' given what appears to be a significant change of position perhaps you would, on reflection, like to withdraw your original post? I think that would be a decent thing to do, since clearly you have more doubts than you once did.
they went to rearrest him to find that he'd checked out of the hotel. so they went to another room, where michael shields was asleep, and arrested him...
this hardly seems like a convincing investigation. it does seem like a determination to get a body at all costs... This is not unknown in the police world, including, alas, the UK police world - birmingham 6, guildford 4, etc...
the testimony of other liverpool fans that offer shields an alibi is supportive...
the repeated fingering of sankey by other fans is circumstailly supportive...
the identification procedures involved a 'parade' where shields was the only englishman, where he had been dressed in a white t-shirt not his own, where he had been held handcuffed in full view in the police station for up to four hours beforehand...
i'd be interested if any of our law students on this forum could comment on these procedures... but it looks like a frame to me...
To CAPS... He seems 'as likely as any other' seems a weakening of some major order from your original post... 'guilty of a terrible crime...' given what appears to be a significant change of position perhaps you would, on reflection, like to withdraw your original post? I think that would be a decent thing to do, since clearly you have more doubts than you once did.
WTW, on RAWK there is a big petition thread to get Shields out, many months ago I asked why no-one was putting pressure on Sankey to do the decent thing, or why as many had posted, that "someone has owned up to it" was the fight not to get him in the dock so that Shields could go free?William the White wrote:Ok - to CWE - I'm almost certain because another man - graham sankey - with a criminal record admitted his guilt. this was the first man arrested by the bulgarian police, then released.
Rather the Scousers of course think that the only right thing to do is to let one guy out, and let a murderer walk around safely in their midst at the same time.
You'd be amazed how many got into a discussion on my point. It was ZERO, not one commented on it, not one, not a single poster on RAWK thought that there was some merit in my view, or that it was even worthy of comment.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Maybe there wasn't? The discussion of one mans guilt or innocence doesn't boil down to only releasing him if they get a replacement, despite the lynch-mob mentality being displayed here.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
That is very interesting, and surprising. I would want sankey charged if there was evidence that would stick, now that he has withdrawn his 'confession'. But I feel shields has been framed, and that an innocent supporter of his club should be released, even if the thug and hooligan that committed this appalling crime cannot be charged.fatshaft wrote:WTW, on RAWK there is a big petition thread to get Shields out, many months ago I asked why no-one was putting pressure on Sankey to do the decent thing, or why as many had posted, that "someone has owned up to it" was the fight not to get him in the dock so that Shields could go free?William the White wrote:Ok - to CWE - I'm almost certain because another man - graham sankey - with a criminal record admitted his guilt. this was the first man arrested by the bulgarian police, then released.
Rather the Scousers of course think that the only right thing to do is to let one guy out, and let a murderer walk around safely in their midst at the same time.
You'd be amazed how many got into a discussion on my point. It was ZERO, not one commented on it, not one, not a single poster on RAWK thought that there was some merit in my view, or that it was even worthy of comment.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests