Jole Cole

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13310
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Jole Cole

Post by Hoboh » Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:10 pm

Shrewd or money grabbing tosser? Good deal for the bin dippers in my opinion

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:45 pm

I thought he'd have gone to where he'd get CL football, myself.
May the bridges I burn light your way

H. Pedersen
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2437
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Post by H. Pedersen » Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:20 pm

Sell Benayoun for 5 million, get Colefor free? Yeah, good deal.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:55 am

I think HP has already given the gist, but I think it needs stressing.

Imagine:

You're a cheapo American who buys a footballing institute and, since football is a business, the fourth biggest footballing name in the world, at least; you then don't back a manager on the up, later giving said manager a bumper new contract before, despite claiming to have no money, then sacking him; from there, getting Joe Cole (admittedly on high wages) plus 4 million quid for Benayoun (a good player but worse than J.Cole) is the best they have done in so very, very long they deserve a fecking standing ovation. Good signing.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

keveh
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4421
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Stuck in the Forums

Post by keveh » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:59 am

Yeah I think what has come out of this isn't how much of a money grabber Joe Cole is, it's more about how good of a signing it is for Liverpool.

Everybody knows the team is pretty much Torres and Gerrard, with other players having bit-part roles. At least this now means they have another quality player, not somebody just to fill a position.
Image

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Post by Puskas » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:14 am

Prufrock wrote:I think HP has already given the gist, but I think it needs stressing.

Imagine:

You're a cheapo American who buys a footballing institute and, since football is a business, the fourth biggest footballing name in the world, at least; you then don't back a manager on the up, later giving said manager a bumper new contract before, despite claiming to have no money, then sacking him; from there, getting Joe Cole (admittedly on high wages) plus 4 million quid for Benayoun (a good player but worse than J.Cole) is the best they have done in so very, very long they deserve a fecking standing ovation. Good signing.
Wouldn't agree that Cole is better than Benayoun. They're both rather good. Cole's main advantage is that he's several years younger. However, he's probably getting paid about twice as much as the Israeli.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:44 am

H. Pedersen wrote:Sell Benayoun for 5 million, get Colefor free? Yeah, good deal.
Cole will cost comfortably more over the course of his contract than Benayoun (when you take the transfer fees and wages into account). Not necessarily the snip it looks at first glance.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:53 am

blurred wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:Sell Benayoun for 5 million, get Colefor free? Yeah, good deal.
Cole will cost comfortably more over the course of his contract than Benayoun (when you take the transfer fees and wages into account). Not necessarily the snip it looks at first glance.
Do you not get bored giving lessons in basics

Spot on, by the way

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:41 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:Do you not get bored giving lessons in basics

Spot on, by the way
I find it necessary with Mr Pedersen.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:17 pm

It'll be good business if he makes 40 or more appearances across all competitions. I do doubt it though. This could be Liverpool's "Michael Owen - circa Manchester Utd years" purchase if Cole doesn't get fit.

I think he suits Liverpool's style, I think they'll benefit from his versatility and experience (he has won titles) but you have to wonder about giving him a 4-year deal. I think his agent's won that one.

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:31 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:It'll be good business if he makes 40 or more appearances across all competitions. I do doubt it though. This could be Liverpool's "Michael Owen - circa Manchester Utd years" purchase if Cole doesn't get fit.
But whatever could it be about Joe 'averaged 17 league appearances per season in 7 years at Chelsea' Cole that would lead you to doubt his fitness?

Especially when compared with Yossi 'average 30 league games a year in the last five' Benayoun?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36201
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:00 pm

blurred wrote:
hisroyalgingerness wrote:It'll be good business if he makes 40 or more appearances across all competitions. I do doubt it though. This could be Liverpool's "Michael Owen - circa Manchester Utd years" purchase if Cole doesn't get fit.
But whatever could it be about Joe 'averaged 17 league appearances per season in 7 years at Chelsea' Cole that would lead you to doubt his fitness?

Especially when compared with Yossi 'average 30 league games a year in the last five' Benayoun?
Though to be fair some of that is down to Cole not always getting into the Chelsea side. Though as you say his fitness record isn't great!

I do think it was a mistake letting Benayoun go though, I like him as a player!

jenkz
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:12 am
Location: The 'edge of town'

Post by jenkz » Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:55 pm

Damn! And we we're so close to signing him too
Nat Lofthouse:

“in my day, there were plenty of fellas who would kick your b****cks off. The difference was that at the end of the match they would shake your hand and help you look for them!”

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28714
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:42 am

Puskas wrote:Wouldn't agree that Cole is better than Benayoun. They're both rather good. Cole's main advantage is that he's several years younger. However, he's probably getting paid about twice as much as the Israeli.
Yossi Benayoun: born 5 May 1980. Joe Cole: born 8 November 1981. Not that much difference, in truth.

It's an interesting zeitgeist tale, this. With Chelsea clearing the wage bills, Cole ran out of options, certainly at the six-figure weekly basic his tenpercenters were requesting. Ferguson's long been a fan but the Rags won't commit to another ageing injury risk. Spurs have a much more rigid pay structure whose ceiling is nowhere near Cole's request. Arsenal decided not to bother, partly through pay structure, partly through pride in youth (why pay £4.7m basic a year, times four years, if you have any faith at all in Wilshere et al?).

Be intriguing to see where he plays. He's long wanted to play centrally as a No.10 but that won't happen while Gerrard's around (and certainly not if Woy wepwises the 4-4-2 he used at Fulham). Cole's problem is that he plays in a position where all the glory boys like to hang out - just off the main striker. For England, he was in a queue behind Rooney, Gerrard and Lampard – the latter of whom has subjugated his game for his country by adapting to a deeper role, but still plays the Forward Ranger for Chelsea. Now Cole has moved from being team-mate to one of the Eternal Problems to the other. It's possible Hodgson could play both in a 4-3-2-1 with attacking full-backs, and Glen Johnson would certainly suit that role, but at the minute Liverpool haven't got any left backs. At all.

Interesting times, and an interesting gamble of what must be a significant slice of the downsized Anfield payroll.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14064
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:10 pm

It's a big name on board, one in which the fans' and players demanded.

They've still got a fair deal on this with Benayoun going t'other way. The transfer fee covers Coles wages for a season, whilst Benyouns freed up wages could add another half season or so. It'll be interesting to see if it still looks a good deal in 18 months time though, once the income used for Cole dries up
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:56 pm

boltonboris wrote:They've still got a fair deal on this with Benayoun going t'other way. The transfer fee covers Coles wages for a season, whilst Benyouns freed up wages could add another half season or so. It'll be interesting to see if it still looks a good deal in 18 months time though, once the income used for Cole dries up
If he is on this reputed £90k a week (which seems reasonable to assume, as it's not near the benchmark of the very top earners at Liverpool but comfortably up there), then his cost to the club over the period of his contract will be comfortably in excess of £20m

£90k a week * 52 = £4.7m per year, or £18.7m over 4 years which, when you include the employer's NIC costs and all that malarky, will top the £20m mark.

Benayoun was on less than half that, and even when you take into account the transfer fee of around £5m this will still end up costing the club a big chunk of money over the term of the contract (especially as Cole's 4 years outlasts Benayoun's deal by at least a year, if not two).

Agree with a lot of DSB's points, too - the age thing is a bit of a misnomer seeing as Cole's only a couple of months away from turning 29 while Yossi's only just turned 30, and given their respective fitness records I might prefer the slightly older, slightly more reliable performer.

It's interesting, that's for sure, but I'm not leaping for joy like some fans are. Oh, and we've got Jonjo Shelvey from Charlton, an 18 year old from Rangers and a freebie from Serbia coming in, too. Our cup runneth over.

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Post by seanworth » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:25 pm

I think it's a good signing. Let's see how Roy does. If he starts playing some of the players in their proper position and accomplish what he did at Fullham which much less money invested, I think some of these crap players might end up not being so bad afterall. Mind I always though Benitez was just a prick.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8600
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by Gary the Enfield » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:30 pm

seanworth wrote:I think it's a good signing. Let's see how Roy does. If he starts playing some of the players in their proper position and accomplish what he did at Fullham which much less money invested, I think some of these crap players might end up not being so bad afterall. Mind I always thought Benitez was just a prick.


And you would be right to think that.

jenkz
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:12 am
Location: The 'edge of town'

Post by jenkz » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:10 pm

Never rated Hodgson, I admit he did well at Fulham, however he could be coming into his own as a experienced and well respected manager. Can't wait for him to shoot down Gerrard's ego though!
Nat Lofthouse:

“in my day, there were plenty of fellas who would kick your b****cks off. The difference was that at the end of the match they would shake your hand and help you look for them!”

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14064
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:32 pm

jenkz wrote:Never rated Hodgson, I admit he did well at Fulham, however he could be coming into his own as a experienced and well respected manager. Can't wait for him to shoot down Gerrard's ego though!
Do you think he'll have more authority than Steven Gerrard? An ageing manager, with little trophies to his name, who's come in from a relatively small club after an uncharacteristically decent season versus Mr Liverpool FC, Champions League winning Captain and Englands World Cup captain?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests