Page 1 of 1
Alex Cisak
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:15 pm
by bwfcdan94
Re: Alex Cisak
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:42 am
by Prufrock
Re: Alex Cisak
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:47 am
by bwfcdan94
Well that was a pointless thread. Thanks for letting me know none the less Pru.
Re: Alex Cisak
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 3:53 pm
by LeverEnd
Cost him a fair bit as well. Maybe he'll sue his legal team next for not pointing out he had bugger all chance of winning.
Re: Alex Cisak
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:12 pm
by bwfcdan94
LeverEnd wrote:Cost him a fair bit as well. Maybe he'll sue his legal team next for not pointing out he had bugger all chance of winning.
, now that would be a sight, maybe he will sue his employer for injury at work.
Re: Alex Cisak
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:36 pm
by Lord Kangana
LeverEnd wrote:Cost him a fair bit as well. Maybe he'll sue his legal team next for not pointing out he had bugger all chance of winning.
It seems a ploy of many an unscrupulous lawyer to allow a case to proceed with flimsy evidence just long enough for them to receive a nice healthy chunk of payment. And then point out to their client the flimsiness of the evidence just prior to court proceedings.