Bolton v Liverpool Match Thread

truewhite15 · Post by **truewhite15** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:30 pm

hisroyalgingerness wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:I think Steinssons being doing alright. It appears I don't hold a majority view. C'est la Vie.
You mustn't have a view at all from your seat if you think that

I'm with LK. Maybe after years of substandard full backs, we're happy with two perfectly adequate ones. Maybe we just hold a differing opinion to the vocal masses. Who knows?

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:33 pm

William the White wrote:
Prufrock wrote:All the money in the world, not just for this game, but up until at least January, fitness permitting:

Jaaskelainen

Steinsson-Cahill-Knight-Robbo

Lee-Muamba-Holden-Petrov

KD-Elmo.
Not if we lose five on the trot!!!

But I agree. That side picks itself so far. With both full backs the most vulnerable.

It's not necessarily what I'd pick, but it's what Coyle will.

As for Steinsson thought he was poor against Wigan and Stoke, but much much better than some of the shite we've had there recently. Robbo I wouldn't describe as particularly vulnerable, mainly because Alonso looks nowhere near being ready, and JLloyd is, well, wank.

Lord Kangana · Post by **Lord Kangana** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:01 pm

Don't rate Robinson. We don't have a better left back at the club though. Unless you play a right-back-who's-better-at-centre-half there, and I don't really see that as an option. Because he's a far better centre half than fullback, mostly.

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:19 pm

Certainly seems that way so far. Never looked convincing at right back. Cahill-Ricketts would be interesting.

jk4714 · Post by **jk4714** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:59 am

personally id like to see 4 defenders 2 def midfielders 1 attacking midfield 2 wingers and 1 striker.
but we have no one who can play def midfield other then muamba so our defense is going to be torn apart by stevie..

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:00 am

Robinson is better than Steinsson IMO.

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:19 am

jk4714 wrote:personally id like to see 4 defenders 2 def midfielders 1 attacking midfield 2 wingers and 1 striker.
but we have no one who can play def midfield other then muamba so our defense is going to be torn apart by stevie..

A-ha.... I give you this Monday's headline

RETURN OF THE G-MAC

Horza · Post by **Horza** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:22 am

Times Football podcast was talking us up for this game. People are expecting us to do them. Utterly bizarre.

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:56 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Robinson is better than Steinsson IMO.

I'm better than Steinsson.

t_o_molloy · Post by **t_o_molloy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:48 am

I thought Ricketts looked decent on the left for a couple of games last season, but he is a monster and Centre back. Shame he can't actually play in his natural position.

Gary the Enfield · Post by **Gary the Enfield** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:48 am

East Lower wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Robinson is better than Steinsson IMO.
I'm better than Steinsson.

No. You're not.

Owen_Coyle · Post by **Owen_Coyle** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:01 am

Lord Kangana wrote:Don't rate Robinson. We don't have a better left back at the club though. Unless you play a right-back-who's-better-at-centre-half there, and I don't really see that as an option. Because he's a far better centre half than fullback, mostly.

I still think that Gardner is the best left back at the Club, but I fear we may not see him figure again, alas !!

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:21 am

Gary the Enfield wrote:
East Lower wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Robinson is better than Steinsson IMO.
I'm better than Steinsson.
No. You're not.

Oh dear

spikeykev · Post by **spikeykev** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:54 pm

Just read on SSN Sean Davis is back for this one, do you think he'll be used? Might be a bit off the pace and I quite like Mavis off the bench, can't see Muamba and Holden being split up cause theyve done a good job so far...

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:55 pm

spikeykev wrote:Just read on SSN Sean Davis is back for this one, do you think he'll be used? Might be a bit off the pace and I quite like Mavis off the bench, can't see Muamba and Holden being split up cause theyve done a good job so far...

Not a chance. He can play in the reserves for a fortnight before coming back into the firsts. Who is Mavis?

Keep the same team as against Wigan, and end it similarly (though hopefully with Steinsson out for Ricketts.....and Taylor not getting a game).

FaninOz · Post by **FaninOz** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:57 pm

East Lower wrote:
spikeykev wrote:Just read on SSN Sean Davis is back for this one, do you think he'll be used? Might be a bit off the pace and I quite like Mavis off the bench, can't see Muamba and Holden being split up cause theyve done a good job so far...
Not a chance. He can play in the reserves for a fortnight before coming back into the firsts. Who is Mavis?

Keep the same team as against Wigan, and end it similarly (though hopefully with Steinsson out for Ricketts.....and Taylor not getting a game).

Mavis = Mark Davies I assume!

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:58 pm

FaninOz wrote:
East Lower wrote:
spikeykev wrote:Just read on SSN Sean Davis is back for this one, do you think he'll be used? Might be a bit off the pace and I quite like Mavis off the bench, can't see Muamba and Holden being split up cause theyve done a good job so far...
Not a chance. He can play in the reserves for a fortnight before coming back into the firsts. Who is Mavis?

Keep the same team as against Wigan, and end it similarly (though hopefully with Steinsson out for Ricketts.....and Taylor not getting a game).
Mavis = Mark Davies I assume!

Oh I see, hilarious!

Is it just me, or has Marky D bulked up a bit lately?

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:59 pm

He has bulked a bit but I think that's down to im needing it with his height, he's not the tallest

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:08 pm

Plus how times have slightly changed:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009 ... -liverpool

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:12 pm

TKIZ! wrote:Plus how times have slightly changed:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009 ... -liverpool

Ricketts at right back, we can but dream!

Connect with your social network account

Bolton v Liverpool Match Thread

Who is online