Nigel reo coker released by villa

[jimbo_bwfc]

If Coker is looking for LESS than 35K, then I'd be happy to have him on board.

Barton is already on 60K p/w and is turning down contract offers, safe to say that one is a non-starter.

Larsson is decent, but not much more and I can't help but think the fact a lot of teams are in for him will push his wage demands far beyond what we should be paying for a player of his calibre.

Also, isn't he just a right footed Matt Taylor? No engine, not likely to beat a man, good shot, half-decent pass, eye-catching if inconsistant set-play.

[keveh]

I'd be more inclined to sign Sebastian Larsson from Birmingham.

Why?

To be honest, I'm not sure anybody mentioned in this thread is going to really make an impact, they are all squad players.

I wouldn't mind anybody who has been named, but as back up and I wouldn't spend a fortune either.

[tell ben im him]

I agree with Tom though, I'd prefer Barton.

I can't believe I actually said that.

i for one dont want that prick here and would not renew if he came fact

[adamworthy2002]

I agree with Tom though, I'd prefer Barton.

I can't believe I actually said that.

i for one dont want that prick here and would not renew if he came fact

Barton is a quality player, I'd love it if we signed him but I really doubt we could afford his wages.

[Mar]

I'd be more inclined to sign Sebastian Larsson from Birmingham.

Why?

I've seen him have a decent impact on games. Thing is for a player of his stature on a free it wouldn't be breaking the bank in wages, it'd be nice cover. If you take a look at his past record there's quite a few purple streaks in there which suggest the potentials there but not yet got the best of. I'm sure with him sniffing around the squad looking for a place all it would take would be a boost in confidence and we'd have someone that would contribute a few goals. All he really needs is consistency.

[Gaz Tomorrow]

I agree with Tom though, I'd prefer Barton.

I can't believe I actually said that.

i for one dont want that prick here and would not renew if he came fact

Great footballer, but I think he is like Bellamy - a nasty piece of work with the ability to ruin the ethic that Coyle has created. Also i can't imagine him wanting to leave Newcastle to come to us.

[Mar]

Wouldn't like Barton to come to the club. Disgusting peice of work and no doubt he'd think himself bigger than the club. Quite clearly talented but he's not really one that would fit into the Coyle ethos. Big Sam's ethos definitely but not Coyle's, i'm sure Coyle would prefer players that don't go around stabbing their youth players in the eye with Cigars.

[Choppers]

I agree with Tom though, I'd prefer Barton.

I can't believe I actually said that.

i for one dont want that prick here and would not renew if he came fact

You'd not renew if the club signed a player you didn't want?

[Hoboh]

I agree with Tom though, I'd prefer Barton.

I can't believe I actually said that.

i for one dont want that prick here and would not renew if he came fact

You'd not renew if the club signed a player you didn't want?

I'd only go if Barton was injured!! He could be Messi that odious little cretin and I still would not have him here FULL STOP!

[TANGODANCER]

Today's People has Barton earmarked for Everton along with Bothroyd.

[CAPSLOCK]

I'd be more inclined to sign Sebastian Larsson from Birmingham.

Why?

I've seen him have a decent impact on games. Thing is for a player of his stature on a free it wouldn't be breaking the bank in wages, it'd be nice cover. If you take a look at his past record there's quite a few purple streaks in there which suggest the potentials there but not yet got the best of. I'm sure with him sniffing around the squad looking for a place all it would take would be a boost in confidence and we'd have someone that would contribute a few goals. All he really needs is consistency.

Larsson would be behind Lee

NRC would be first choice in the middle where we were woefully exposed

If we were getting a wide right and a central midfielder, fair enough, but if its one or the other its no contest

And, Larsson is shite

I'm glad you're not signing players for us

[aussie_wanderer]

yes, if hes not guna cost us alot per week

[kingstanding villa]

He wouldnt sign a new contract at 50 grand a week he wants 80 grand a week and has run his old contract down . he thinks one of the big 4 are after him so his agent keeps telling him.

[seanworth]

He wouldnt sign a new contract at 50 grand a week he wants 80 grand a week and has run his old contract down . he thinks one of the big 4 are after him so his agent keeps telling him.

Best of luck to him. Think he will come back to you to renegotiate later when nothing pans out with the big 4?

[tell ben im him]

I agree with Tom though, I'd prefer Barton.

I can't believe I actually said that.

i for one dont want that prick here and would not renew if he came fact

Barton is a quality player, I'd love it if we signed him but I really doubt we could afford his wages.

oh do feck off feck*

[BWFC_Wyles]

Yes, if his wage demands are acceptable

[ohjimmyjimmy]

What, like he pays us instead?

[BWFC_Wyles]

What, like he pays us instead?

Exactly! £3 per game!

[boltonboris]

He's a decent enough player. And for a free I'd take him on. Wage permitting.

[tell ben im him]

I agree with Tom though, I'd prefer Barton.

I can't believe I actually said that.

i for one dont want that prick here and would not renew if he came fact

You'd not renew if the club signed a player you didn't want?

no dont put words in my mouth i said joey barton and i mean only joey barton. anyway he wont be coming here so end of story.