Matt Mills
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Matt Mills
I dont know...BEN's reporting a permanent three year deal.BL3 wrote:He's on loan isn't he? So if he's as inept as you say, he'll be re-joining you soon enough.Leicester wrote:I hope for your sake that he can refind his Reading form.
But I really think we've pulled a fast one on you.
Good luck for the season, here's to us sharing the two automatic promotion spots come May
As for Leicester, is it just me who's wondering why the f**k you're favourites for promotion?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Matt Mills
Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill. 

-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: Matt Mills
Man City and Real Madrid, anyone get figures for there wage bill ? This will be interestingWorthy4England wrote:Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Matt Mills
http://www.bwfc.co.uk/page/General/0,,1 ... 24,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Signed, and it's permanent on a three year deal. 2M fee apparently though officially 'undisclosed' as ever nowadays!
Signed, and it's permanent on a three year deal. 2M fee apparently though officially 'undisclosed' as ever nowadays!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Matt Mills
Didn't the whole saga hit a snag sometime last week? Probably something to do with us wanting a loan/leicester wanting a permanent deal. Like few have said I imagine it's a compromise at a million now and another load next year but football finances are really not my forte, tbh I don't have a feckin clue about em.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:I dont know...BEN's reporting a permanent three year deal.BL3 wrote:He's on loan isn't he? So if he's as inept as you say, he'll be re-joining you soon enough.Leicester wrote:I hope for your sake that he can refind his Reading form.
But I really think we've pulled a fast one on you.
Good luck for the season, here's to us sharing the two automatic promotion spots come May
As for Leicester, is it just me who's wondering why the f**k you're favourites for promotion?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Matt Mills
Probably in here somewhere...Relentless09 wrote:Man City and Real Madrid, anyone get figures for there wage bill ? This will be interestingWorthy4England wrote:Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill.
http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/i ... /index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Matt Mills
It's confirmed.wanderers_on_tour wrote:Didn't the whole saga hit a snag sometime last week? Probably something to do with us wanting a loan/leicester wanting a permanent deal. Like few have said I imagine it's a compromise at a million now and another load next year but football finances are really not my forte, tbh I don't have a feckin clue about em.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:I dont know...BEN's reporting a permanent three year deal.BL3 wrote:He's on loan isn't he? So if he's as inept as you say, he'll be re-joining you soon enough.Leicester wrote:I hope for your sake that he can refind his Reading form.
But I really think we've pulled a fast one on you.
Good luck for the season, here's to us sharing the two automatic promotion spots come May
As for Leicester, is it just me who's wondering why the f**k you're favourites for promotion?
Permanent.
Done deal.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Matt Mills
http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wa ... der_Mills/
Wanderers land Leicester defender Mills
1:00pm Wednesday 4th July 2012 in Latest By Marc Iles
WANDERERS have confirmed the signing of Leicester City defender Matt Mills.
The Whites have not divulged the fee paid for the 25-year-old centre-half but it is understood to be around £2million.
A season-long loan had been agreed between the two clubs before the deal hit a snag just over a week ago. After further talks, the transfer has now been made a permanent one, with the former Reading and Doncaster man signing a three-year contract.
Mills was signed by Sven-Goran Eriksson from Reading last season in a deal that could have eventually been worth £5m. But after the former England boss left the King Power Stadium Mills quickly found himself out in the cold under Nigel Pearson.
He did not play for the Foxes during the last three months of last season and was ordered to train with the reserves. But Mills – who helped Reading into the play-off finals the season before last - is due to start a new chapter in his career by joining his new team-mates at Euxton tomorrow.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Matt Mills
New 'on field' Captain ??
Surely to God (S)KD can't be a regular 90min man next year ??
Surely to God (S)KD can't be a regular 90min man next year ??
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Matt Mills
Aye - though I believe one mistake Leicester made was making him captain straight away and he got a bit big for his boots. I'd give it Ricketts on that basis...be nice to have a few leaders.
Re: Matt Mills
Good luck to ya!
That's for taking him though
That's for taking him though

Re: Matt Mills
Worthy4England wrote:Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill.
Not in this league there isn't.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Re: Matt Mills
No correlation? I'd be very surprised at that. I have no idea of the figures, and am too apathetic to check, but surely West Ham would have had one of the higher wage bills of the league last year? And probably Reading.Leicester wrote:Worthy4England wrote:Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill.
Not in this league there isn't.
QPR, certainly, the year before.
It isn't a guarantee of success, but spending a lot of money certainly helps. Which is why, as I've said over and over, football is completely pointless, and we may as well call it all off and just let each club count out their wads of cash. Award the trophies to those with the biggest pile. That way we can all stop wasting our time and so something enjoyable and useful instead.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
Re: Matt Mills
...and still didn't even make the play-offs despite being favourites last season as well.Prufrock wrote:Coz they spent about a trillion quid last year.
Re: Matt Mills
According to the bookies you are:Leicester wrote:And no, we're not favourites for promotion.
http://www.oddschecker.com/football/eng ... hip/winner" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Matt Mills
Leicester wrote:Worthy4England wrote:Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill.
Not in this league there isn't.
Certainly not when Swansea were in it.
Their wage bill was a fraction of many others
What goes around may still come around
Re: Matt Mills
If you think that there is a correlation between success and wage in this league then you're mistaken.
Just ask Hull, Ipswich, Middlesborough, QPR (took them 3 years to go up), West Ham (really struggled, should have walked the league, still successful I know but considering who got there ahead of them), Leicester and Forest.
And they are in the last 2/3 seasons alone.
Trust me, the correlation is between players who work hard for the side and who has a really good manager.
Just ask QPR, Swansea, Norwich, Southampton, Reading and Blackpool.
Just ask Hull, Ipswich, Middlesborough, QPR (took them 3 years to go up), West Ham (really struggled, should have walked the league, still successful I know but considering who got there ahead of them), Leicester and Forest.
And they are in the last 2/3 seasons alone.
Trust me, the correlation is between players who work hard for the side and who has a really good manager.
Just ask QPR, Swansea, Norwich, Southampton, Reading and Blackpool.
Last edited by Leicester on Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Matt Mills
BL3 wrote:...and still didn't even make the play-offs despite being favourites last season as well.Prufrock wrote:Coz they spent about a trillion quid last year.
What's with the constant digs?
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:16 am
Re: Matt Mills
Anyway, isn't he a ginger? Is there any correlation between hair colour and success in gaining promotion? Come you stattos, do your worst.Leicester wrote:BL3 wrote:...and still didn't even make the play-offs despite being favourites last season as well.Prufrock wrote:Coz they spent about a trillion quid last year.
What's with the constant digs?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Matt Mills
There will always be the odd outliers. QPR's wages bill the season before last was about the same as ours.Leicester wrote:If you think that there is a correlation between success and wage in this league then you're mistaken.
Just ask Hull, Ipswich, Middlesborough, QPR (took them 3 years to go up), West Ham (really struggled, should have walked the league, still successful I know but considering who got there ahead of them), Leicester and Forest.
And they are in the last 2/3 seasons alone.
Trust me, the correlation is between players who work hard for the side and who has a really good manager.
Just ask QPR, Swansea, Norwich, Southampton, Reading and Blackpool.
You've had West Ham twice, Sunderland twice, Newcastle, West Brom twice, Wolves, QPR, Stoke and Wiggin - all of whom spent a few bob on the way.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 22 guests