Signings
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Signings
Anyway, yay, Zat Knight.
Why doesn't Megson ever get called out on that one? Its like people forget who signed him.
Why doesn't Megson ever get called out on that one? Its like people forget who signed him.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Signings
Indeed. And let's not forget the bloke who has just handed him a two year deal!Lord Kangana wrote:Anyway, yay, Zat Knight.
Why doesn't Megson ever get called out on that one? Its like people forget who signed him.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Signings
Clearly much worse than splashing out £4m and a three year deal.
I give up. The myth perpetuates.
I give up. The myth perpetuates.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Signings
Ermm well, if he was the wrong signing, and we've had three years of evidence most of which under the current manager then I'd say signing him on a new two year deal is worse.Lord Kangana wrote:Clearly much worse than splashing out £4m and a three year deal.
I give up. The myth perpetuates.
Either way it won't be as bad as paying 4M for NGog or 2M for Alonso, and handing both long term deals!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Signings
Seriously though, I know you actually believe that.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Signings
You honestly believe that signing a guy for 4 million to start in the Premier League for 3 years is better than re signing that player as a back up for 2 years while in a LOWER division? Seriously, some people will interpret anything a particular way if it suits their particular dislike for a manager.BWFC_Insane wrote:Ermm well, if he was the wrong signing, and we've had three years of evidence most of which under the current manager then I'd say signing him on a new two year deal is worse.Lord Kangana wrote:Clearly much worse than splashing out £4m and a three year deal.
I give up. The myth perpetuates.
Either way it won't be as bad as paying 4M for NGog or 2M for Alonso, and handing both long term deals!
Re: Signings
If sordell or someone else we get ahold of proves to be a good goalscorer, Ngog will shine. He is brilliant at holding up the ball, can create chances and is pretty pacy when he gets to use it.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Signings
If ngogs a centre forward Worthy is a morris dancer.
Anyway fair point there by LK, if we are comparing megson and coyle. but its pointless doing that. coyles in charge now and the signings made so far are pretty good given our situation. We shall see if he can manage them appropriately!!
Anyway fair point there by LK, if we are comparing megson and coyle. but its pointless doing that. coyles in charge now and the signings made so far are pretty good given our situation. We shall see if he can manage them appropriately!!
Re: Signings
He doesn't have to be worse than Megson to be shit!
Megson is gone, let it go. Coyle ought to be judged on the job he does, not what his predecessor did. He has clearly failed up to now. He is clearly going to get a shot at next year, so lets all hope he doesn't fail.
Megson is gone, let it go. Coyle ought to be judged on the job he does, not what his predecessor did. He has clearly failed up to now. He is clearly going to get a shot at next year, so lets all hope he doesn't fail.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: Signings
I don't get why Zat Knight would be used to pick between either of them. They both clearly rate him.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: Signings
Go on, I challenge you to pick one player in our side who's on a massive salary, in comparison to what we used to see as 'massive'.BWFC_Insane wrote:I bet our wage bill is higher than when we signed Okocha etc...
However, 2 factors, 1 is 'football inflation' increasing the wages of all players, so equivalent players command more.
The other is that Allardyce tapped into a market that barely exists anymore if at all.
My guess would be that Petrov and Davies would probably be on the most, and they will be on nowhere near what we offered to Djorkaeff, Okocha, Hierro and Campo.
The wage bill has been slashed by half with the drop into the Championship, so I really don't understand your logic.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Signings
That's always going to be a toughie, as we have no notion what individual players were on when Allardyce was here nor do we know now - Sure there's some paper talk n stuff.Gail Platz wrote:Go on, I challenge you to pick one player in our side who's on a massive salary, in comparison to what we used to see as 'massive'.BWFC_Insane wrote:I bet our wage bill is higher than when we signed Okocha etc...
However, 2 factors, 1 is 'football inflation' increasing the wages of all players, so equivalent players command more.
The other is that Allardyce tapped into a market that barely exists anymore if at all.
My guess would be that Petrov and Davies would probably be on the most, and they will be on nowhere near what we offered to Djorkaeff, Okocha, Hierro and Campo.
The wage bill has been slashed by half with the drop into the Championship, so I really don't understand your logic.
What we do know is our wage bill was about double (based on the last published Accounts) than when Allardyce departed.
I'm sure they were cut this year. Will be interesting to see by how much when this year's Accounts are published.
Re: Signings
Under Allardyce any big signings were offset by the fact others were making peanuts. IIRC we used to bring over people like Ben Haim and Jaidi on 5k a week.
Currently we seem to be a bit like Arsenal in that we don't pay massive wages to our top players, but even the shite are pretty well paid.
Currently we seem to be a bit like Arsenal in that we don't pay massive wages to our top players, but even the shite are pretty well paid.
Re: Signings
I'd not be that convinced. 'Apparently' Anelka's new contract was 60kpw. 'Apparently' Petrov was on 60kpw (bearing in mind Bosmans tend to get more in wages given there is no transfer fee). I'd put no money on the accuracy of individual reports, but I'd be very surprised if we weren't paying our squad a lot more on average now (or this time last year, as a prem team) than we were under Allardyce. I'd also be surprised if our revenues weren't a lot bigger, despite being worse. It isn't really a like for like comparison.Gail Platz wrote:Go on, I challenge you to pick one player in our side who's on a massive salary, in comparison to what we used to see as 'massive'.BWFC_Insane wrote:I bet our wage bill is higher than when we signed Okocha etc...
However, 2 factors, 1 is 'football inflation' increasing the wages of all players, so equivalent players command more.
The other is that Allardyce tapped into a market that barely exists anymore if at all.
My guess would be that Petrov and Davies would probably be on the most, and they will be on nowhere near what we offered to Djorkaeff, Okocha, Hierro and Campo.
The wage bill has been slashed by half with the drop into the Championship, so I really don't understand your logic.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Signings
Buried among the old Megson/Coyle argument and the new BL3/W4E one, this is quite an interesting point: if Ngog gets a partner able to feed off his selfless workrate we might be reet. Bit of a Reeves/Philliskirk thing going on, except I'd hope Ngog has a phone app to locate cow's backsides... being serious, I think he could come good in front of goal with a bit of confidence. It's an interesting subplot to a season full of yer honest actual good old-fashioned uncertainty: likesay, we could quite conceivably finish anywhere between 1st and 24th.Jez wrote:If sordell or someone else we get ahold of proves to be a good goalscorer, Ngog will shine. He is brilliant at holding up the ball, can create chances and is pretty pacy when he gets to use it.
Re: Signings
About N'Gog coming good with a bit of confidence: people said the same thing about Ade Akinbiyi.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Signings
Did they?Mar wrote:About N'Gog coming good with a bit of confidence: people said the same thing about Ade Akinbiyi.
Re: Signings
Problem I have with that is scoring one never seemed to give him a lift last year. His goals were scored with alarming scarcity, but disturbing regularity 

In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Signings
Yeah, I noticed that too. But we were never not struggling. I know it's a bit crap to say "he'd be good in a winning team" but... ah, we'll see.Prufrock wrote:Problem I have with that is scoring one never seemed to give him a lift last year. His goals were scored with alarming scarcity, but disturbing regularity
Re: Signings
I can see why people are optimistic. He 'looks' like a good player. He also never 'looked' like scoring. Hopefully he will come good on that front, but even if he doesn't you'd hope there are enough goals in that team from other areas. Scoring wasn't our problem last year. Petrov, Andrews, Lee, Eagles, Pratters, even Mark Davies could all get towards ten you'd hope. Then there is the great unknown...
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 25 guests