Burnley vs Bolton
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Or...we're being neutral about it because we don't know the whole story?JoshBWFC26 wrote:Yes, but Tyson is built like a shed, whereas Vela is built like a pogo stick. And all I'm doing is responding to the guy who told me to back up why I think Vela is a wanker. Seems people on here just blindly take the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt.a1 wrote:mike tyson is five ten.
dont give a feck were he posted it.
he didnt have the balls to fight mr vela and his son.
fecking good job he's not in the army now.
do one with your troll spreadin' .
theyre gonna win 8 nil tomorrow
come on
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Dont we all wear Bolton shirts on here?JoshBWFC26 wrote:Yes, but Tyson is built like a shed, whereas Vela is built like a pogo stick. And all I'm doing is responding to the guy who told me to back up why I think Vela is a wanker. Seems people on here just blindly take the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt.a1 wrote:mike tyson is five ten.
dont give a feck were he posted it.
he didnt have the balls to fight mr vela and his son.
fecking good job he's not in the army now.
do one with your troll spreadin' .
theyre gonna win 8 nil tomorrow
come on

-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
I've not seen one neutral comment.truewhite15 wrote:Or...we're being neutral about it because we don't know the whole story?JoshBWFC26 wrote:Yes, but Tyson is built like a shed, whereas Vela is built like a pogo stick. And all I'm doing is responding to the guy who told me to back up why I think Vela is a wanker. Seems people on here just blindly take the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt.a1 wrote:mike tyson is five ten.
dont give a feck were he posted it.
he didnt have the balls to fight mr vela and his son.
fecking good job he's not in the army now.
do one with your troll spreadin' .
theyre gonna win 8 nil tomorrow
come on
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
you sound like his sister.JoshBWFC26 wrote:
Yes, but Tyson is built like a shed, whereas Vela is built like a pogo stick. And all I'm doing is responding to the guy who told me to back up why I think Vela is a wanker. Seems people on here just blindly take the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt.
no one cares.
some gimp on the internet carnt even troll proper then whines like a bitch to 48 other websites.
the pied piper of hamlin . in troll form.
theyre gonna win 8 nil tommorow.
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Oh, I see. No, alright, I get it. We're "blindly taking the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt" because we're not all agreeing with you that he's a wanker who should never play for the club again, that about right?JoshBWFC26 wrote:I've not seen one neutral comment.truewhite15 wrote:Or...we're being neutral about it because we don't know the whole story?JoshBWFC26 wrote:Yes, but Tyson is built like a shed, whereas Vela is built like a pogo stick. And all I'm doing is responding to the guy who told me to back up why I think Vela is a wanker. Seems people on here just blindly take the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt.a1 wrote:mike tyson is five ten.
dont give a feck were he posted it.
he didnt have the balls to fight mr vela and his son.
fecking good job he's not in the army now.
do one with your troll spreadin' .
theyre gonna win 8 nil tomorrow
come on
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Wonderful observations. You must have a high level of education.a1 wrote:you sound like his sister.JoshBWFC26 wrote:
Yes, but Tyson is built like a shed, whereas Vela is built like a pogo stick. And all I'm doing is responding to the guy who told me to back up why I think Vela is a wanker. Seems people on here just blindly take the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt.
no one cares.
some gimp on the internet carnt even troll proper then whines like a bitch to 48 other websites.
the pied piper of hamlin . in troll form.
theyre gonna win 8 nil tommorow.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Posting comments like "It's a good job that soft as shite guy isn't in the military anymore" isn't exactly a neutral comment is it.truewhite15 wrote:Oh, I see. No, alright, I get it. We're "blindly taking the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt" because we're not all agreeing with you that he's a wanker who should never play for the club again, that about right?JoshBWFC26 wrote:I've not seen one neutral comment.truewhite15 wrote:Or...we're being neutral about it because we don't know the whole story?JoshBWFC26 wrote:Yes, but Tyson is built like a shed, whereas Vela is built like a pogo stick. And all I'm doing is responding to the guy who told me to back up why I think Vela is a wanker. Seems people on here just blindly take the side of the guy who wears a Bolton shirt.a1 wrote:mike tyson is five ten.
dont give a feck were he posted it.
he didnt have the balls to fight mr vela and his son.
fecking good job he's not in the army now.
do one with your troll spreadin' .
theyre gonna win 8 nil tomorrow
come on
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
if yr not his sister. youre this "armyman's" unpaid intern.JoshBWFC26 wrote:
Wonderful observations. You must have a high level of education.
josh vela's just posted this on his twitter
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Again, really intuitive and brilliant contribution.a1 wrote:if yr not his sister. youre this "armyman's" unpaid intern.JoshBWFC26 wrote:
Wonderful observations. You must have a high level of education.
josh vela's just posted this on his twitter
[img]
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... ce.svg.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;[/img]
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
That's an extreme example. That's not what everyone's saying, now, is it? I'll give you a minute. Go on, go back, read over the thread again. I'll think you'll find that the vast majority of people are commenting that the whole story hasn't been told, or that it's only Facebook, and as such, shouldn't be taken so seriously.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Posting comments like "It's a good job that soft as shite guy isn't in the military anymore" isn't exactly a neutral comment is it.
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
i'm not the one wanking at my keyboard over a reply on a football forum.JoshBWFC26 wrote:
Again, really intuitive and brilliant contribution.
Mr. "member since *today's date*"
bolton verses burnley thread *most read thread to spread trolling in*
oldest , spoilingest , shitest , tactic.
bolton 8
burnley nil
(josh vela hat)
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Most of the comments imply that the guy aimed insults personally at Vela, and this wasn't the case. Vela just has the intellect of a 3 year old toddler and doesn't believe anyone is allowed to have an opinion on whether he should play or not.truewhite15 wrote:That's an extreme example. That's not what everyone's saying, now, is it? I'll give you a minute. Go on, go back, read over the thread again. I'll think you'll find that the vast majority of people are commenting that the whole story hasn't been told, or that it's only Facebook, and as such, shouldn't be taken so seriously.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Posting comments like "It's a good job that soft as shite guy isn't in the military anymore" isn't exactly a neutral comment is it.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
If you read through my OP was thread related, it was the response which went off topic. And "i'm not the one wanking at my keyboard over a reply on a football forum." That comment is the poorest comeback I have ever heard.a1 wrote:i'm not the one wanking at my keyboard over a reply on a football forum.JoshBWFC26 wrote:
Again, really intuitive and brilliant contribution.
Mr. "member since *today's date*"
bolton verses burnley thread *most read thread to spread trolling in*
oldest , spoilingest , shitest , tactic.
bolton 8
burnley nil
(josh vela hat)
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Mods, a1 has it
ban this troll
fecking inbred burnley bastard
ban this troll
fecking inbred burnley bastard
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
http://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/article/ngog ... 18273.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
WE'RE DOOOOOMED!!!!
WE'RE DOOOOOMED!!!!
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
officer_dibble wrote:Mods, a1 has it
ban this troll
fecking inbred burnley bastard
Inbred, says the one with his location as Leeds. Yorkshire. The irony.
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
You're the one with the screenshots. Lay before us the evidence that this bloke didn't personally attack Vela on some BWFC Facebook page. If you can't, then don't insult our intelligence by saying we're blind for not believing what we can't see.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Most of the comments imply that the guy aimed insults personally at Vela, and this wasn't the case. Vela just has the intellect of a 3 year old toddler and doesn't believe anyone is allowed to have an opinion on whether he should play or not.truewhite15 wrote:That's an extreme example. That's not what everyone's saying, now, is it? I'll give you a minute. Go on, go back, read over the thread again. I'll think you'll find that the vast majority of people are commenting that the whole story hasn't been told, or that it's only Facebook, and as such, shouldn't be taken so seriously.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Posting comments like "It's a good job that soft as shite guy isn't in the military anymore" isn't exactly a neutral comment is it.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
Is the fact that Vela after he realizes he has been snapped, says "I'm only joking mate your entitled to your opinion and I respect it" proof enough? Seems it to me.truewhite15 wrote:You're the one with the screenshots. Lay before us the evidence that this bloke didn't personally attack Vela on some BWFC Facebook page. If you can't, then don't insult our intelligence by saying we're blind for not believing what we can't see.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Most of the comments imply that the guy aimed insults personally at Vela, and this wasn't the case. Vela just has the intellect of a 3 year old toddler and doesn't believe anyone is allowed to have an opinion on whether he should play or not.truewhite15 wrote:That's an extreme example. That's not what everyone's saying, now, is it? I'll give you a minute. Go on, go back, read over the thread again. I'll think you'll find that the vast majority of people are commenting that the whole story hasn't been told, or that it's only Facebook, and as such, shouldn't be taken so seriously.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Posting comments like "It's a good job that soft as shite guy isn't in the military anymore" isn't exactly a neutral comment is it.
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
dear mr. troll i still carnt see why the burnley thread is the place for this.
it happened MONTHS ago.
it happened MONTHS ago.
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: Burnley vs Bolton
How exactly is that proof that the bloke didn't directly insult Vela? It's nothing more than an admission from Vela that he shouldn't have continued the conversation. It indicates nothing towards whether he has been verbally attacked or not.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Is the fact that Vela after he realizes he has been snapped, says "I'm only joking mate your entitled to your opinion and I respect it" proof enough? Seems it to me.truewhite15 wrote:You're the one with the screenshots. Lay before us the evidence that this bloke didn't personally attack Vela on some BWFC Facebook page. If you can't, then don't insult our intelligence by saying we're blind for not believing what we can't see.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Most of the comments imply that the guy aimed insults personally at Vela, and this wasn't the case. Vela just has the intellect of a 3 year old toddler and doesn't believe anyone is allowed to have an opinion on whether he should play or not.truewhite15 wrote:That's an extreme example. That's not what everyone's saying, now, is it? I'll give you a minute. Go on, go back, read over the thread again. I'll think you'll find that the vast majority of people are commenting that the whole story hasn't been told, or that it's only Facebook, and as such, shouldn't be taken so seriously.JoshBWFC26 wrote:Posting comments like "It's a good job that soft as shite guy isn't in the military anymore" isn't exactly a neutral comment is it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests