The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:11 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Yeah but you're comparing him to players who have major experience, N'gog is only 23.Mar wrote:IggyTheDawgster wrote:It's not surprising his confidence is low when a loanee keeps getting in the starting lineup ahead of him is it.throwawayboltonian wrote:I'm not defending him at all but given his extreme lack of goals, the lad probably has non-existent confidence which certainly doesn't help when we throw him into games we need results from. I think he should be dropped to the reserves for a while (assuming he's not already) to see if he can get some goals and confidence.Mar wrote:N'Gog gets the ball in the box but lays it off to Mears. Pull the f'king trigger N'Gog.
Sturridge kept getting in ahead of Klasnic yet he managed to score, as did Elmander. Hmmmmm maybe its just N'Gog.
That being said N'Gog has just had a header towards goal (improvement....)
It ain't easy, Sleazy even, Deceiving those we, Believe in.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:47 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Eaves the goal machine
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36411
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Didn't we sign Sordell cos he scored goals at this level?
-
- Promising
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:30 am
- Location: Underneath the squeaky floorboard, behind the kitchen dresser
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
David N'Gog tried to something he wasn't quite capable of, said Jack Dearden
Shooting perhaps.
Shooting perhaps.
If I should die, think only this of me:
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Coyle found us Ngog, Sordell and Afobe ( Expensive players who don't score shedloads of goals), its a new tactic !!!!!!!!!!danardif1 wrote:Well we haven't had an out-and-out goalscorer since Michael Ricketts... I'm just wondering why other teams keep finding the likes of Charlie Austin, Jordan Rhodes, Ricky Lambert etc. (cheap players who score shed loads of goals) and not us?The Berlin Bear wrote:i was kidding but We need a striker who scores goals.IggyTheDawgster wrote:He's only just come on. He's not useless, He holds the ball up well.The Berlin Bear wrote:Chungy on for spearing? I would take N'gog off hahaha. completely useless
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
BWFC_Insane wrote:Didn't we sign Sordell cos he scored goals at this level?
I can only think he's a lazy sod in training. It's quite incredible how little game time he's had.
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Yeah theres tom eaves, I'm sure theres another young striker we have waiting in the wings too though
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:35 pm
- Location: Berlin
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Oh jesus. Its gonna be one of those nights i fear. sorry for the negativity. Why cant we stop loosing away?
Eisern Union!
HGW XX/7 Gewidmet, in Dankbarkeit
HGW XX/7 Gewidmet, in Dankbarkeit
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
we don't play him because Coyle is insane....BWFC_Insane wrote:Didn't we sign Sordell cos he scored goals at this level?
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
N'Gog may 'only' be 23 but still has less than half the League goals than Sordell has scored (who is 19 by the way)...IggyTheDawgster wrote:Yeah but you're comparing him to players who have major experience, N'gog is only 23.Mar wrote:IggyTheDawgster wrote:It's not surprising his confidence is low when a loanee keeps getting in the starting lineup ahead of him is it.throwawayboltonian wrote:I'm not defending him at all but given his extreme lack of goals, the lad probably has non-existent confidence which certainly doesn't help when we throw him into games we need results from. I think he should be dropped to the reserves for a while (assuming he's not already) to see if he can get some goals and confidence.Mar wrote:N'Gog gets the ball in the box but lays it off to Mears. Pull the f'king trigger N'Gog.
Sturridge kept getting in ahead of Klasnic yet he managed to score, as did Elmander. Hmmmmm maybe its just N'Gog.
That being said N'Gog has just had a header towards goal (improvement....)
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Now that would be quality.thebish wrote:what we need is for MD to dive in the box and win us a penalty again...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36411
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Making the point with people lamenting the fact we don't have a scorer.thebish wrote:we don't play him because Coyle is insane....BWFC_Insane wrote:Didn't we sign Sordell cos he scored goals at this level?
Not blaming Jimmy, he didn't spend 3M of Eddies money on him.
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Must be too much to get 2 wins on the bounce.
Grim again.
Grim again.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43339
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Wolves defending their lead now and are we shot shy or what? Making the chances but ...oh, Davo caught offside. Doyle off for a defender. Free on the edge of the D for us ......and........
Petrov...Eagles? ...goes wide...for a corner. No joy but we're really pressing now.
Petrov...Eagles? ...goes wide...for a corner. No joy but we're really pressing now.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
well - it is established fact that he DID get goals at this level - and you criticised Coyle for not playing him... but he's still not being picked...BWFC_Insane wrote:Making the point with people lamenting the fact we don't have a scorer.thebish wrote:we don't play him because Coyle is insane....BWFC_Insane wrote:Didn't we sign Sordell cos he scored goals at this level?
Not blaming Jimmy, he didn't spend 3M of Eddies money on him.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:07 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Crystal Palace are winning 1-0.... someone needs to get to Freedman pretty quite and tell him its too late to go back.
NEIL LENNON'S SUPERWHITE ARMY
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
But, But, But we always beat the Wolves.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
- Location: Bolton
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
More N'gog shite.
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:35 pm
- Location: Berlin
Re: The "We're the one and only Wanderers" Match Thread
Bolton are simply not clinical enough from open play. Sounds like they have played very well tonight. Gutting
Eisern Union!
HGW XX/7 Gewidmet, in Dankbarkeit
HGW XX/7 Gewidmet, in Dankbarkeit
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 90 guests