The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:03 am

CrazyHorse wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote: He signed a contract with us. But as explained the rest needs sorting before he has 'signed'.
What time of the day do you have start drinking at for this to make any sense? Seriously this sort of riddle would give Gollum a headache.
It makes perfect sense.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by CrazyHorse » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:26 am

He's signed but something has to happen before he's signed.

Aye, perfect sense. My precious.
Businesswoman of the year.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:36 am

CrazyHorse wrote:He's signed but something has to happen before he's signed.

Aye, perfect sense. My precious.
He signed a contract with us. But was still under contract with Leicester at the time. And an agreement had to be reached between Beckford his agent and Leicester (and potentially Bolton too) as to how the Leicester contract would be cancelled. Until such time his registration couldn't be transferred from Leicester to Bolton. So he signed a contract but wasn't our player.

Bruno3
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Bruno3 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:46 am

But surely he was not in a position to sign a contract with us while his contract with Leicester was still in place - unless what he signed with us had a proviso in it saying that it only became valid once the Leicester one had been terminated

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:51 am

Bruno3 wrote:But surely he was not in a position to sign a contract with us while his contract with Leicester was still in place - unless what he signed with us had a proviso in it saying that it only became valid once the Leicester one had been terminated
It happens all the time. Usually a fee is agreed permission given to the player to speak to the club, talks, medical, player signs deal, money exchanges hands, registration is transferred.

In this case the issue being that Leicester didn't realise they'd have to pay Beckford off. So they stalled on the registration being transferred.

That's why under contract players have to get permission from their current club before speaking to a new one.

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:10 pm

Nixon says there is a bid in for one of our strikers. Trying to keep for tomorrow's paper but might come out later.

In one comment he says the whole thing will come as a shock.

Hmmm.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14101
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:11 pm

N'gog didn't travel yesterday did he?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:14 pm

boltonboris wrote:N'gog didn't travel yesterday did he?
I don't think he did. Can only see it being Ngog or Sordell.

Bijou Bob
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3935
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Bijou Bob » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:17 pm

If it's a 'shock' I can only see it being for one we have just bought or a local club like Wiggin bidding for Sordell. The N'gog thing seems more likely and personally, I expect him to leave. I don't want to lose him, but I expect we will.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:21 pm

Well, it's just a bid ... and we want to bid for players, so we have to expect people to bid for ours.

Hardly a shock if it is N'Gog or Sordell ... unless someone offering serious money is the shock !

The other one would be if it was Eagles (again) or Chungy.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14101
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:22 pm

Someone in the Twittersphere reckons it's Cardiff in for Sordell, which isn't much of a shock. Although they've paid about £8m for that Cornelius lad from Denmark.

Someone else on twittersphere reckons it's a prem team (possibly Hull) in for Tom Eaves.. Which would be surprising and probably not one that would spark his interest too much.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

mrkint
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by mrkint » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:28 pm

Aye, but someone on twittersphere also reckons Chelsea bid £10m and Mata for Rooney.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28832
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:29 pm

bobo the clown wrote:Hardly a shock if it is N'Gog or Sordell ... unless someone offering serious money is the shock !
boltonboris wrote:Someone in the Twittersphere reckons it's Cardiff in for Sordell, which isn't much of a shock.
These. Craig Davies or Tom Eaves would be a "shock", but not N'Gog (linked away) or Sordell (never really settled). Coyle going for one of his old buys wouldn't be a shock. But there we go, analysing words, just like he wants. I'm just glad there's some sense of traffic going out of the club - we can't keep hiring without firing. I'd like to see Mills off to Leeds, by the same rationale.

Eagles and Chungy aren't strikers.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 28832
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:29 pm

mrkint wrote:Aye, but someone on twittersphere also reckons Chelsea bid £10m and Mata for Rooney.
...and that MU turned it down.

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:34 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
mrkint wrote:Aye, but someone on twittersphere also reckons Chelsea bid £10m and Mata for Rooney.
...and that MU turned it down.
The funniest part of that is that "Sky sources" say they offered Mata or Luiz plus 10 million.

If Sky believe that, then the need to step away from the HP sauce!

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:35 pm

If its a shock then it could be Beckford!

StaffsTrotter
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by StaffsTrotter » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:36 pm

perhaps we've already sold beckford before we've unveiled him .....that would be a shock

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 36440
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:44 pm

NGog or Sordell being bid for would hardly be a shock. Unless the surprise was Moyes was in for them.

I'd go with Eaves or Craig Davies or possibly Zach Clough. Mind we were meant to be announcing Beckford this morning and haven't so 2+2=?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:46 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:NGog or Sordell being bid for would hardly be a shock. Unless the surprise was Moyes was in for them.

I'd go with Eaves or Craig Davies or possibly Zach Clough. Mind we were meant to be announcing Beckford this morning and haven't so 2+2=?
Eaves is injured (again) isn't he ?

Craig Davies would be a surprise but he (& Dougie) must feel he's a bit surplus.

If it was Clough I'd be pissed about it. I really want to see him come through this year.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

newcarsmell
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:07 am
Location: Makes Megson Look Like Mourinho.. Owen Owen Coyle

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread

Post by newcarsmell » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:48 pm

Blackburn in for Beckford ?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests