The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Norwich will have only taken him as a short term replacement now Hooper is out injured. Great short term move imo just not the franchise star we all hoped.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
If he'd had all three,how long would we have been able to keep him at Bolton anyway?throwawayboltonian wrote: I look back on him like Petrov; lots of skill, nice movement and such but rarely any end product. Even under Coyle when he played better. He contributed more than Petrov IMO, but in a similar way underwhelmed despite the potential and promise. Scored some nice goals though, that one against Wolves is one of the best I've ever seen.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:17 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Coyle only played him out of his natural position a handful of times and that was only to facilitate the best goalscorer we've had at this club since Anelka. Even so he still performed admirably and in the same capacity that people are arguing Rooney should just get on and deal with it, so did Elmo.throwawayboltonian wrote:I don't think that Coyle used him "correctly" to paraphrase you, he often played him out of position in reality, I think that he just reacted better to his more fluffy man management than Megson's screaming and blaming. Understandable really.StaffsTrotter wrote:Good player Elmander, even if we only saw things spasmodically. Think sooner people realise that how a player is used by a manager and the effect team mates have on a players performance the better. Disappointed when he went as he just seemed to be hitting his stride and the fact that we'd spent so much to get nothing back.throwawayboltonian wrote:Interesting point of view. To me he always looked flashy and threatening, but rarely delivered apart from that brief period under Coyle.BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't know about overrated.throwawayboltonian wrote: So? Overrated, always has been. He had a good few weeks, maybe month or two, under Coyle and that was it. Lot of skill, but rarely any end product.
He cost £8M. His replacements in NGog and Sordell cost £7M.
Sordell is now warming Charltons bench. NGog is well NGog.
I'd rather have Elmander to be honest.
You might also give him some credit and think that he might have seen through Coyle.
However my point is that he was really overrated. Flashy player, but often didn't deliver. It was during the November-January period roughly IIRC when he was shit-hot, and even then turned tepid again. Towards the end of his time with us he didn't impress much (admittedly played out of position though, right midfield was it?).
I look back on him like Petrov; lots of skill, nice movement and such but rarely any end product. Even under Coyle when he played better. He contributed more than Petrov IMO, but in a similar way underwhelmed despite the potential and promise. Scored some nice goals though, that one against Wolves is one of the best I've ever seen.
Tbh Elmander didn't see through anything. He bolted for more money, a champions league side and a fresh start away from an atmosphere that had at times (albeit in the minority) proven hostile to him except for his purple patch before christmas. He was only around during Owens peak so don't think he can be credited with some great fore-sight, it was purely personal.
I'm not bitter but if he wanted to stay he could have.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
so - at least possibly - depending on wages etc. - at Norwich - in the context of this thread - he has been over-rated? We won't know unless we know the details and can look back on the impact he has made for them...BWFC_Insane wrote:Well he's getting on a bit now. I think he would be a big improvement for us. But Norwich? They've already signed a few strikers and I don't know how much of an improvement he'd be over those.thebish wrote:hmmmm.... but I don't really see how it makes much sense to "rate" a player by reference to the cost of another bought at a different time and in different circumstances - down that path lies madness - especially when you take Andy Carroll into account...
best way to "rate" Elmander in the context of this thread would be to suggest whether you think he will make a significant difference to Norwich's premiership fortunes... the jury (surely) is still out on that one...
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
or, in the spirit of belittling ourselves, if he had all 3, would we have had him in the 1st place ?TANGODANCER wrote:If he'd had all three,how long would we have been able to kepp him at Bolton anyway?throwawayboltonian wrote: I look back on him like Petrov; lots of skill, nice movement and such but rarely any end product. Even under Coyle when he played better. He contributed more than Petrov IMO, but in a similar way underwhelmed despite the potential and promise. Scored some nice goals though, that one against Wolves is one of the best I've ever seen.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
SSN this morning: "Elmander, a failure at Bolton..."
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I've have no idea. It is reported they are bringing him in as "cover". So whether they are "overrating" him or not is a complete unknown.thebish wrote:so - at least possibly - depending on wages etc. - at Norwich - in the context of this thread - he has been over-rated? We won't know unless we know the details and can look back on the impact he has made for them...BWFC_Insane wrote:Well he's getting on a bit now. I think he would be a big improvement for us. But Norwich? They've already signed a few strikers and I don't know how much of an improvement he'd be over those.thebish wrote:hmmmm.... but I don't really see how it makes much sense to "rate" a player by reference to the cost of another bought at a different time and in different circumstances - down that path lies madness - especially when you take Andy Carroll into account...
best way to "rate" Elmander in the context of this thread would be to suggest whether you think he will make a significant difference to Norwich's premiership fortunes... the jury (surely) is still out on that one...
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
doesn't that tag onto all of our ex playersDave Sutton's barnet wrote:SSN this morning: "Elmander, a failure at Bolton..."

I wonder who came up with that one and on what basis
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
we got relegated after he left..Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:SSN this morning: "Elmander, a failure at Bolton..."
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Not belittling ourselves ST, just accepting a financial reality. That's football.StaffsTrotter wrote:or, in the spirit of belittling ourselves, if he had all 3, would we have had him in the 1st place ?TANGODANCER wrote:If he'd had all three,how long would we have been able to kepp him at Bolton anyway?throwawayboltonian wrote: I look back on him like Petrov; lots of skill, nice movement and such but rarely any end product. Even under Coyle when he played better. He contributed more than Petrov IMO, but in a similar way underwhelmed despite the potential and promise. Scored some nice goals though, that one against Wolves is one of the best I've ever seen.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Are we that desperate for transfers that we're discussing other teams prospective signings 

- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Was Elmo worth the money we spent.....
Is he better than any of the strikers we currently have..... by a country fvcking mile
Is he good enough for Norwich.....Easily a snippet for half a mill ( obviously depends on wages)
Is he better than any of the strikers we currently have..... by a country fvcking mile
Is he good enough for Norwich.....Easily a snippet for half a mill ( obviously depends on wages)
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
aye! since Nixon's den was closed down - we're gagging for it!!AbrahM wrote:Are we that desperate for transfers that we're discussing other teams prospective signings

-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Don't think its all about the money though. I'd actually throw in the personal/ time dimensions as well, in that its very rare for a player to have all 3 consistently throughout a career anyway. Any player is capable of any of them, but strikes me as large measure of circumstance & luck for it to come together at a particular club. Think of McGinlay, Walker, Holden. Was not much money involved but it it came together here, would it have elsewhere.TANGODANCER wrote:Not belittling ourselves ST, just accepting a financial reality. That's football.StaffsTrotter wrote:or, in the spirit of belittling ourselves, if he had all 3, would we have had him in the 1st place ?TANGODANCER wrote:If he'd had all three,how long would we have been able to kepp him at Bolton anyway?throwawayboltonian wrote: I look back on him like Petrov; lots of skill, nice movement and such but rarely any end product. Even under Coyle when he played better. He contributed more than Petrov IMO, but in a similar way underwhelmed despite the potential and promise. Scored some nice goals though, that one against Wolves is one of the best I've ever seen.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
thebish wrote:aye! since Nixon's den was closed down - we're gagging for it!!AbrahM wrote:Are we that desperate for transfers that we're discussing other teams prospective signings
Notice all quiet on a number of forums. As was said any number of times to anti-Nixonites, at least he was keeping us fed with tittle tattle on our club. Without him what have we got

Could be of course that we just aren't doing anything

Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Success or failure is judged on what a player produces in relation to expectations. These were justifiably high due to transfer fee, reputation and wages, and half a season of form doesn't match up. So a failure in my view all things considered. Not all his fault though (Megson!), and he's a decent player, just didn't show it nearly often enough for us.
...
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Peterborough director of football Barry Fry helped deliver his granddaughter when his daughter Amber and her partner - Brighton striker Craig Mackail-Smith - were too late to reach hospital for the birth.Enoch wrote:I went to see him do a turn with a Q&A session tagged on, thought he was great value, funny as f*ck.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
I don't think we ever gave him a serious offer.wanderers_on_tour wrote: Coyle only played him out of his natural position a handful of times and that was only to facilitate the best goalscorer we've had at this club since Anelka. Even so he still performed admirably and in the same capacity that people are arguing Rooney should just get on and deal with it, so did Elmo.
Tbh Elmander didn't see through anything. He bolted for more money, a champions league side and a fresh start away from an atmosphere that had at times (albeit in the minority) proven hostile to him except for his purple patch before christmas. He was only around during Owens peak so don't think he can be credited with some great fore-sight, it was purely personal.
I'm not bitter but if he wanted to stay he could have.
From what I remember from the stories at the time (and a radio interview he did) Eddie Davies wasn't the biggest Elmander fan in the world and bizarrely seemed to hold the player responsible for the money we paid for him, as opposed to either Gartside or Megson.
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
That sounds more like an A&E session!thebish wrote:Peterborough director of football Barry Fry helped deliver his granddaughter when his daughter Amber and her partner - Brighton striker Craig Mackail-Smith - were too late to reach hospital for the birth.Enoch wrote:I went to see him do a turn with a Q&A session tagged on, thought he was great value, funny as f*ck.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:38 pm
Re: The "Nothing to see here"Transfer thread
Bolton and Leeds looking to do a swap deal Mills for peltier
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 34 guests